scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming

TLDR
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Jerome and Florence Brill Graduate Student Fellowship) as discussed by the authors ) was the first recipient of the WBIR grant. But this work was performed in a supervised setting.
Abstract
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Jerome and Florence Brill Graduate Student Fellowship)

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer

TL;DR: How transcriptional control is disrupted by genetic alterations in cancer cells, why transcriptional dependencies can develop as a consequence of dysregulated programs, and how these dependencies provide opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions in cancer are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

A decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency

TL;DR: The mechanisms underlying transcription factor-mediated reprogramming are still poorly understood; however, several mechanistic insights have recently been obtained, making it more amenable to applications in the fields of regenerative medicine, disease modelling and drug discovery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pioneer transcription factors target partial DNA motifs on nucleosomes to initiate reprogramming

TL;DR: This work compares the nucleosome and chromatin targeting activities of Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4, which together reprogram somatic cells to pluripotency and provides insight into how pioneer factors can target naive chromatin sites.
Journal ArticleDOI

Transcription factors as readers and effectors of DNA methylation

TL;DR: Evidence is emerging to suggest that transcription factors lacking a MBD can also interact with methylated DNA, and the identification of these proteins and the elucidation of their characteristics and the biological consequences are important stepping stones towards a mechanistic understanding of methylation-mediated biological processes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Reprogramming Factor Stoichiometry Influences the Epigenetic State and Biological Properties of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

TL;DR: The data indicate that stoichiometry of reprogramming factors can influence epigenetic and biological properties of iPS cells and should be considered when comparing different iPS and ES cell lines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells

TL;DR: iPS cells generated with OSK and Tbx3 (OSKT) are superior in both germ-cell contribution to the gonads and germ-line transmission frequency, and the need to rigorously characterize iPS cells beyond in vitro studies is highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

TL;DR: It is suggested that caution should be exercised before assuming that hiPSCs occupy a pluripotent state equivalent to that of hESCs, particularly when producing differentiated cells for regenerative medicine aims, because of single cell heterogeneity amongst stem cell populations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells

TL;DR: Deep proteomic coverage of four human embryonic stem cell and four induced pluripotent stem cell lines in biological triplicate is reported and the Stem Cell–Omics Repository is introduced, a resource to collate and display quantitative information across multiple planes of measurement, including mRNA, protein and post-translational modifications.