scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
Jing Liu1, Jing Liu2, Daniela Ottaviani2, Daniela Ottaviani1, Meriem Sefta1, Meriem Sefta2, Céline Desbrousses2, Céline Desbrousses1, Elodie Chapeaublanc2, Elodie Chapeaublanc1, Rosario Aschero3, Nanor Sirab1, Nanor Sirab2, Fabiana Lubieniecki3, Gabriela Lamas3, Laurie Tonon, Catherine Dehainault4, Clément Hua1, Clément Hua2, Paul Fréneaux4, Sacha Reichman5, Narjesse Karboul1, Narjesse Karboul2, Anne Biton, Liliana Mirabal-Ortega6, Liliana Mirabal-Ortega2, Magalie Larcher6, Magalie Larcher2, Céline Brulard2, Céline Brulard1, Céline Brulard7, Sandrine Arrufat4, André Nicolas4, Nabila Elarouci, Tatiana Popova2, Fariba Nemati4, Didier Decaudin4, David Gentien4, Sylvain Baulande2, Odette Mariani4, Florent Dufour1, Florent Dufour2, Sylvain Guibert, Céline Vallot, Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic4, Alexandre Matet4, Alexandre Matet1, Laurence Desjardins4, Guillem Pascual-Pasto8, Mariona Suñol8, Jaume Català-Mora8, Genoveva Correa Llano8, Jérôme Couturier4, Emmanuel Barillot9, Emmanuel Barillot2, Paula Schaiquevich3, Paula Schaiquevich10, Marion Gauthier-Villars2, Marion Gauthier-Villars4, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet4, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet1, Lisa Golmard4, Lisa Golmard2, Claude Houdayer, Hervé Brisse4, Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot1, Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot2, Eric Letouzé1, Alain Viari, Simon Saule6, Simon Saule2, Xavier Sastre-Garau4, François Doz1, François Doz4, Angel M. Carcaboso8, Nathalie Cassoux1, Nathalie Cassoux4, Celio Pouponnot6, Celio Pouponnot2, Olivier Goureau5, Guillermo Chantada, Aurélien de Reyniès, Isabelle Aerts4, Isabelle Aerts1, Isabelle Aerts2, F. Radvanyi1, F. Radvanyi2 
TL;DR: In this paper, the existence of two retinoblastoma subtypes was demonstrated using multi-omics data, and two subtypes were identified, one in a cone differentiated state and one more aggressive showing cone dedifferentiation and expressing neuronal markers.
Abstract: Retinoblastoma is the most frequent intraocular malignancy in children, originating from a maturing cone precursor in the developing retina. Little is known on the molecular basis underlying the biological and clinical behavior of this cancer. Here, using multi-omics data, we demonstrate the existence of two retinoblastoma subtypes. Subtype 1, of earlier onset, includes most of the heritable forms. It harbors few genetic alterations other than the initiating RB1 inactivation and corresponds to differentiated tumors expressing mature cone markers. By contrast, subtype 2 tumors harbor frequent recurrent genetic alterations including MYCN-amplification. They express markers of less differentiated cone together with neuronal/ganglion cell markers with marked inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. The cone dedifferentiation in subtype 2 is associated with stemness features including low immune and interferon response, E2F and MYC/MYCN activation and a higher propensity for metastasis. The recognition of these two subtypes, one maintaining a cone-differentiated state, and the other, more aggressive, associated with cone dedifferentiation and expression of neuronal markers, opens up important biological and clinical perspectives for retinoblastomas. Retinoblastoma is the most frequent intraocular paediatric malignancy whose molecular basis remains poorly understood. Here, the authors perform multi-omic analysis and identify two subtypes; one in a cone differentiated state and one more aggressive showing cone dedifferentiation and expressing neuronal markers.

34 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Lieske H. Schrijver1, Antonis C. Antoniou2, Håkan Olsson3, T.M. Mooij1, Marie-José Roos-Blom1, Leyla Azarang1, Julian Adlard4, Munaza Ahmed5, Daniel Barrowdale2, Rosemarie Davidson6, Alan Donaldson7, Ros Eeles8, D. Gareth Evans9, Debra Frost2, Alex Henderson10, Louise Izatt11, Kai-ren Ong, Valérie Bonadona12, Valérie Bonadona13, Isabelle Coupier14, Laurence Faivre, Jean-Pierre Fricker, Paul Gesta, Klaartje van Engelen15, Agnes Jager16, Fred H. Menko1, Marian J.E. Mourits17, Christian F. Singer18, Yen Y. Tan18, Lenka Foretova, Marie Navratilova, Rita K. Schmutzler19, Carolina Ellberg3, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Trinidad Caldés20, Jacques Simard21, Edith Olah, Anna Jakubowska22, Anna Jakubowska23, Johanna Rantala24, Ana Osorio, John L. Hopper25, Kelly-Anne Phillips26, Kelly-Anne Phillips25, Roger L. Milne27, Roger L. Milne25, Mary Beth Terry28, Catherine Noguès14, Christoph Engel29, Karin Kast30, David E. Goldgar31, Flora E. van Leeuwen1, Douglas F. Easton2, Nadine Andrieu, Matti A. Rookus1, Lilian Laborde, Pauline Pontois, Emanuelle Breysse, Margot Berline, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Bruno Buecher, Chrystelle Colas, Olivier Caron, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme, Claire Saule, Christine Lasset, Sophie Dussard, Pascaline Berthet, Elisabeth Luporsi, Véronique Mari, Laurence Gladieff, Stéphanie Chieze-Valéro, Jessica Moretta, Hagay Sobol, François Eisinger, Cornel Popovici, Michel Longy, Louise Grivelli, Florent Soubrier, Patrick Benusiglio, Pascal Pujol, Carole Corsini, Marie-Emmanuelle Morin-Meschin, Alain Lortholary, Claude Adenis, Audrey Maillez, Tan Dat Nguyen, Capucine Delnatte, Caroline Abadie, Julie Tinat, Isabelle Tennevet, Christine Maugard, Yves-Jean Bignon, Clotilde Penet, Hélène Dreyfus, Odile Cohen-Haguenauer, Brigitte Gilbert, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Dominique Leroux, Clémentine Legrand, Hélène Zattara-Cannoni, Valérie Layet, Elodie Lacaze, Sandra Fert-Ferrer, Odile Bera, Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier, David Tougeron, Hakima Lallaoui, Matti A. Rookus1, Frans B L Hogervorst, F.E. van Leeuwen, Muriel A. Adank, Marjanka K. Schmidt, D.J. Jenner, J. M. Collee, A. M. W. Van Den Ouweland, M.J. Hooning, I.A. Boere, C. J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, R. B. van der Luijt, T.C.T.E.F. van Cronenburg, M.R. Wevers, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Marco J. Koudijs, I. van de Beek, K. van Engelen, Johannes J. P. Gille, E.B. Gómez García, Marinus J. Blok, M. de Boer, Louise Berger, AH van der Hout, M.J.E. Mourits17, G.H. de Bock, Sabine Siesling, J. Verloop, E.C. van den Broek 
TL;DR: In this article, the associations of various characteristics of oral contraceptive use and risk of ovarian cancer were investigated, including duration of use, age at first use, and time since last use.

26 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel R. Barnes1, Valentina Silvestri2, Goska Leslie1, Lesley McGuffog1  +176 moreInstitutions (74)
TL;DR: In this article, the associations of population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) with breast and prostate risks for male BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers were assessed.
Abstract: Background Recent population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed. We assessed the associations of these PRS with breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Methods 483 BRCA1 and 1,318 BRCA2 European ancestry male carriers were available from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A 147-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prostate cancer PRS (PRSPC) and a 313-SNP breast cancer PRS were evaluated. There were three versions of the breast cancer PRS, optimized to predict overall (PRSBC), estrogen-receptor (ER) negative (PRSER-) or ER-positive (PRSER+) breast cancer risk. Results PRSER+ yielded the strongest association with breast cancer risk. The odds ratios (ORs) per PRSER+ standard deviation estimates were 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.07-1.83) for BRCA1 and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.16-1.52) for BRCA2 carriers. PRSPC was associated with prostate cancer risk for both BRCA1 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.28-2.33) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.34-1.91) carriers. The estimated breast cancer ORs were larger after adjusting for female relative breast cancer family history. By age 85 years, for BRCA2 carriers, the breast cancer risk varied from 7.7% to 18.4% and prostate cancer risk from 34.1% to 87.6% between the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS distributions. Conclusions Population-based prostate and female breast cancer PRS are associated with a wide range of absolute breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These findings warrant further investigation aimed at providing personalized cancer risks for male carriers and to inform clinical management.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Inge M. M. Lakeman1, Alexandra J. van den Broek2, Juliën A. M. Vos2, Daniel R. Barnes3, Julian Adlard4, Irene L. Andrulis5, Irene L. Andrulis6, Adalgeir Arason7, Norbert Arnold8, Banu Arun9, Judith Balmaña, Daniel Barrowdale3, Javier Benitez, Åke Borg10, Trinidad Caldés11, Maria A. Caligo, Wendy K. Chung12, Kathleen Claes13, J. Margriet Collée14, Fergus J. Couch15, Mary B. Daly16, Joe Dennis3, Mallika Sachdev Dhawan17, Susan M. Domchek18, Ros Eeles19, Christoph Engel20, D. Gareth Evans21, Lídia Feliubadaló, Lenka Foretova, Eitan Friedman22, Eitan Friedman23, Debra Frost3, Patricia A. Ganz24, Judy Garber25, Simon A. Gayther26, Anne-Marie Gerdes27, Andrew K. Godwin28, David E. Goldgar29, Eric Hahnen30, Christopher R. Hake31, Ute Hamann32, Frans B. L. Hogervorst2, Maartje J. Hooning33, John L. Hopper34, Peter J. Hulick35, Peter J. Hulick36, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs37, Louise Izatt38, Anna Jakubowska39, Anna Jakubowska40, Paul A. James34, Ramunas Janavicius41, Uffe Birk Jensen42, Yue Jiao43, Yue Jiao44, Esther M. John45, Vijai Joseph46, Beth Y. Karlan24, Carolien M. Kets2, Irene Konstantopoulou, Ava Kwong47, Clémentine Legrand, Goska Leslie3, Fabienne Lesueur43, Fabienne Lesueur44, Jennifer T. Loud, Jan Lubinski40, Siranoush Manoukian, Lesley McGuffog3, Austin Miller48, Denise Molina Gomes, Marco Montagna, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme43, Katherine L. Nathanson18, Susan L. Neuhausen49, Heli Nevanlinna50, Joanne Ngeow Yuen Yie51, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade35, Sue K. Park52, Sue K. Park53, Michael T. Parsons54, Paolo Peterlongo, Marion Piedmonte48, Paolo Radice, Johanna Rantala55, Gad Rennert56, Harvey A. Risch57, Rita K. Schmutzler30, Priyanka Sharma28, Jacques Simard58, Christian F. Singer59, Zsofia K. Stadler46, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet60, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet43, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet61, Christian Sutter62, Yen Y. Tan59, Manuel R. Teixeira63, Soo Hwang Teo64, Soo Hwang Teo65, Alex Teulé, Mads Thomassen66, Darcy L. Thull67, Marc Tischkowitz68, Marc Tischkowitz69, Amanda E. Toland70, Nadine Tung71, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg72, Ana Vega73, Barbara Wappenschmidt30, Peter Devilee1, Christi J. van Asperen1, Jonine L. Bernstein46, Kenneth Offit46, Douglas F. Easton3, Matti A. Rookus2, Georgia Chenevix-Trench54, Antonis C. Antoniou3, Mark E. Robson46, Marjanka K. Schmidt1, Marjanka K. Schmidt2 
Leiden University Medical Center1, Netherlands Cancer Institute2, University of Cambridge3, Chapel Allerton Hospital4, University of Toronto5, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute6, University of Iceland7, University of Kiel8, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center9, Lund University10, Hospital Clínico San Carlos11, Columbia University12, Ghent University13, Erasmus University Medical Center14, Mayo Clinic15, Fox Chase Cancer Center16, University of California, San Francisco17, University of Pennsylvania18, Institute of Cancer Research19, Leipzig University20, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre21, Sheba Medical Center22, Tel Aviv University23, University of California, Los Angeles24, Harvard University25, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center26, Copenhagen University Hospital27, University of Kansas28, University of Utah29, University of Cologne30, Memorial Hospital of South Bend31, German Cancer Research Center32, Erasmus University Rotterdam33, University of Melbourne34, University of Chicago35, NorthShore University HealthSystem36, University of Washington37, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust38, Laboratory of Molecular Biology39, Pomeranian Medical University40, Vilnius University41, Aarhus University Hospital42, Curie Institute43, Mines ParisTech44, Stanford University45, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center46, University of Hong Kong47, Roswell Park Cancer Institute48, Beckman Research Institute49, University of Helsinki50, Nanyang Technological University51, New Generation University College52, Seoul National University53, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute54, Karolinska Institutet55, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology56, Yale University57, Laval University58, Medical University of Vienna59, Paris Descartes University60, French Institute of Health and Medical Research61, University Hospital Heidelberg62, University of Porto63, University of Malaya64, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation65, Odense University Hospital66, University of Pittsburgh67, McGill University68, National Institute for Health Research69, Ohio State University70, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center71, University of Pretoria72, University of Santiago de Compostela73
TL;DR: In this paper, a Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between overall and ER-specific polygenic risk score (PRS313) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk, in BRCA1 and bRCA2 pathogenic variant heterozygotes.

12 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the first results of the ongoing French national COVAR (cosegregation variant) study were reported, the aim of which is to classify BRCA1/2 VUSs.
Abstract: Up to 80% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants remain of uncertain clinical significance (VUSs). Only variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic can guide breast and ovarian cancer prevention measures and treatment by PARP inhibitors. We report the first results of the ongoing French national COVAR (cosegregation variant) study, the aim of which is to classify BRCA1/2 VUSs. The classification method was a multifactorial model combining different associations between VUSs and cancer, including cosegregation data. At this time, among the 653 variants selected, 101 (15%) distinct variants shared by 1,624 families were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic or benign/likely benign by the COVAR study. Sixty-six of the 101 (65%) variants classified by COVAR would have remained VUSs without cosegregation data. Of note, among the 34 variants classified as pathogenic by COVAR, 16 remained VUSs or likely pathogenic when following the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Although the initiation and organization of cosegregation analyses require a considerable effort, the growing number of available genetic tests results in an increasing number of families sharing a particular variant, and thereby increases the power of such analyses. Here we demonstrate that variant cosegregation analyses are a powerful tool for the classification of variants in the BRCA1/2 breast-ovarian cancer predisposition genes.

10 citations



Posted ContentDOI
11 Sep 2021-bioRxiv
TL;DR: In this paper, a deep learning model was used to predict homologous recombination DNA-repair deficiency (HRD) in a controlled cohort with unprecedented accuracy (AUC: 0.86) and a new visualization technique was developed to automatically extract new morphological features related to HRD.
Abstract: Homologous Recombination DNA-repair deficiency (HRD) is a well-recognized marker of platinum-salt and PARP inhibitor chemotherapies in ovarian and breast cancers (BC). Causing high genomic instability, HRD is currently determined by BRCA1/2 sequencing or by genomic signatures, but its morphological manifestation is not well understood. Deep Learning (DL) is a powerful machine learning technique that has been recently shown to be capable of predicting genomic signatures from stained tissue slides. However, DL is known to be sensitive to dataset biases and lacks interpretability. Here, we present and evaluate a strategy to control for biases in retrospective cohorts. We train a deep-learning model to predict the HRD in a controlled cohort with unprecedented accuracy (AUC: 0.86) and we develop a new visualization technique that allows for automatic extraction of new morphological features related to HRD. We analyze in detail the extracted morphological patterns that open new hypotheses on the phenotypic impact of HRD.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the frequency of BRCA2 mutations was established for each combination of phenotypes, and compared between patients meeting or not the criteria for each subgroup using Fisher's exact test.
Abstract: Background Mutations of the BRCA2 gene are the most frequent alterations found in germline DNA from men with prostate cancer (PrCa), but clinical parameters that could better orientate for BRCA2 mutation screening need to be established. Methods Germline DNA from 325 PrCa patients (median age at diagnosis: 57 years old) was screened for BRCA2 mutation. The mutation frequency was compared between three subgroups: patients with an age at diagnosis at 55 years old and under (Group I); a personal or family history of breast, uterine or ovarian cancer (Group II); or a metastatic disease (Group III). Frequency of BRCA2 mutations was established for each combination of phenotypes, and compared between patients meeting or not the criteria for each subgroup using Fisher's exact test. Mutual information, direct effect, elasticity and contribution to the mutational status of each phenotype, taking into account overlap between subgroups, were also estimated using Bayesian algorithms. Results The proportion of BRCA2 mutation was 5.9% in Group I, 10.9% in Group II and 6.9% in Group III. The frequency of BRCA2 mutation was significantly higher among patients of Group II (p = .006), and reached 15.6% among patients of this group who presented a metastatic disease. Mutual information, direct effect, elasticity and contribution to the mutational status were the highest for phenotype II. Fifteen (71.4%) of the 21 BRCA2 mutation carriers had an aggressive form of the disease. Four (19%) of them died from PrCa after a median follow-up duration of 64.5 months. Conclusions Our results showed that a higher frequency of BRCA2 mutation carriers is observed, not only among PrCa patients with young onset or a metastatic disease, but also with a personal or a familial history of breast cancer.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
25 Jun 2021-Cancers
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed DNA from 20 families with one apparent duplication and nine deletions with a dedicated comparative genomic hybridization array, high-resolution BRCA1 Genomic Morse codes analysis and Sanger sequencing.
Abstract: Background: Large genomic rearrangements (LGR) in BRCA1 consisting of deletions/duplications of one or several exons have been found throughout the gene with a large proportion occurring in the 5′ region from the promoter to exon 2. The aim of this study was to better characterize those LGR in French high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Methods: DNA from 20 families with one apparent duplication and nine deletions was analyzed with a dedicated comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array, high-resolution BRCA1 Genomic Morse Codes analysis and Sanger sequencing. Results: The apparent duplication was in fact a tandem triplication of exons 1 and 2 and part of intron 2 of BRCA1, fully characterized here for the first time. We calculated a causality score with the multifactorial model from data obtained from six families, classifying this variant as benign. Among the nine deletions detected in this region, eight have never been identified. The breakpoints fell in six recurrent regions and could confirm some specific conformation of the chromatin. Conclusions: Taken together, our results firmly establish that the BRCA1 5′ region is a frequent site of different LGRs and highlight the importance of the segmental duplication and Alu sequences, particularly the very high homologous region, in the mechanism of a recombination event. This also confirmed that those events are not systematically deleterious.

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the perceived information received on BC risk factors, and related characteristics, in female relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant, undergoing BC risk assessment using the CanRisk© prediction tool.

4 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the contribution of SNPs of the iCOGS array in GENESIS consisting of BC cases with no BRCA1/2 mutation and a sister with BC, and population controls was assessed.
Abstract: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in over 180 loci have been associated with breast cancer (BC) through genome-wide association studies involving mostly unselected population-based case-control series. Some of them modify BC risk of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation and may also explain BC risk variability in BC-prone families with no BRCA1/2 mutation. Here, we assessed the contribution of SNPs of the iCOGS array in GENESIS consisting of BC cases with no BRCA1/2 mutation and a sister with BC, and population controls. Genotyping data were available for 1281 index cases, 731 sisters with BC, 457 unaffected sisters and 1272 controls. In addition to the standard SNP-level analysis using index cases and controls, we performed pedigree-based association tests to capture transmission information in the sibships. We also performed gene- and pathway-level analyses to maximize the power to detect associations with lower-frequency SNPs or those with modest effect sizes. While SNP-level analyses identified 18 loci, gene-level analyses identified 112 genes. Furthermore, 31 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and 7 Atlas of Cancer Signaling Network pathways were highlighted (false discovery rate of 5%). Using results from the “index case-control” analysis, we built pathway-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) and assessed their performance in the population-based CECILE study and in a data set composed of GENESIS-affected sisters and CECILE controls. Although these PRS had poor predictive value in the general population, they performed better than a PRS built using our SNP-level findings, and we found that the joint effect of family history and PRS needs to be considered in risk prediction models.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A hybrid record linkage process to link databases from two independent ongoing national studies, GEMO and GENEPSO, is described, which may be generalizable to other epidemiological studies involving other databases and registries.
Abstract: Background: Linking independent sources of data describing the same individuals enable innovative epidemiological and health studies but require a robust record linkage approach. We describe a hybrid record linkage process to link databases from two independent ongoing French national studies, GEMO (Genetic Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2), which focuses on the identification of genetic factors modifying cancer risk of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and GENEPSO (prospective cohort of BRCAx mutation carriers), which focuses on environmental and lifestyle risk factors. Methods: To identify as many as possible of the individuals participating in the two studies but not registered by a shared identifier, we combined probabilistic record linkage (PRL) and supervised machine learning (ML). This approach (named "PRL + ML") combined together the candidate matches identified by both approaches. We built the ML model using the gold standard on a first version of the two databases as a training dataset. This gold standard was obtained from PRL-derived matches verified by an exhaustive manual review. Results The Random Forest (RF) algorithm showed a highest recall (0.985) among six widely used ML algorithms: RF, Bagged trees, AdaBoost, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network. Therefore, RF was selected to build the ML model since our goal was to identify the maximum number of true matches. Our combined linkage PRL + ML showed a higher recall (range 0.988-0.992) than either PRL (range 0.916-0.991) or ML (0.981) alone. It identified 1995 individuals participating in both GEMO (6375 participants) and GENEPSO (4925 participants). Conclusions: Our hybrid linkage process represents an efficient tool for linking GEMO and GENEPSO. It may be generalizable to other epidemiological studies involving other databases and registries.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A very rare case of familial breast cancer and diffuse gastric cancer, with germline pathogenic variants in both BRCA1 and CDH1 genes, which is challenging for genetic counselling and management of at-risk individuals.
Abstract: Introduction: We report a very rare case of familial breast cancer and diffuse gastric cancer, with germline pathogenic variants in both BRCA1 and CDH1 genes To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such an association Family description: The proband is a woman diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 52 years She requested genetic counselling in 2012, at the age of 91 years, because of a history of breast cancer in her daughter, her sister, her niece and her paternal grandmother and was therefore concerned about her relatives Her sister and maternal aunt also had gastric cancer She was tested for several genes associated with hereditary breast cancer Results: A large deletion of BRCA1 from exons 1 to 7 and two CDH1 pathogenic cis variants were identified Conclusion: This complex situation is challenging for genetic counselling and management of at-risk individuals

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a stable consensus solution formed by the 68 genes most consistently selected across multiple subsamples of GENESIS, which was also enriched in genes known to be associated with breast cancer susceptibility.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) explore the genetic causes of complex diseases. However, classical approaches ignore the biological context of the genetic variants and genes under study. To address this shortcoming, one can use biological networks, which model functional relationships, to search for functionally related susceptibility loci. Many such network methods exist, each arising from different mathematical frameworks, pre-processing steps, and assumptions about the network properties of the susceptibility mechanism. Unsurprisingly, this results in disparate solutions. To explore how to exploit these heterogeneous approaches, we selected six network methods and applied them to GENESIS, a nationwide French study on familial breast cancer. First, we verified that network methods recovered more interpretable results than a standard GWAS. We addressed the heterogeneity of their solutions by studying their overlap, computing what we called the consensus. The key gene in this consensus solution was COPS5, a gene related to multiple cancer hallmarks. Another issue we observed was that network methods were unstable, selecting very different genes on different subsamples of GENESIS. Therefore, we proposed a stable consensus solution formed by the 68 genes most consistently selected across multiple subsamples. This solution was also enriched in genes known to be associated with breast cancer susceptibility (BLM, CASP8, CASP10, DNAJC1, FGFR2, MRPS30, and SLC4A7, P-value = 3 × 10−4). The most connected gene was CUL3, a regulator of several genes linked to cancer progression. Lastly, we evaluated the biases of each method and the impact of their parameters on the outcome. In general, network methods preferred highly connected genes, even after random rewirings that stripped the connections of any biological meaning. In conclusion, we present the advantages of network-guided GWAS, characterize their shortcomings, and provide strategies to address them. To compute the consensus networks, implementations of all six methods are available at https://github.com/hclimente/gwas-tools.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A risk-adjusted prevention concept that is based on the best current evidence making needed and appropriate preventive measures available, and which is constantly evaluated through outcome evaluation, and continuously improved based on these results is proposed.
Abstract: Background: Risk-adjusted cancer screening and prevention is a promising and continuously emerging option for improving cancer prevention. It is driven by increasing knowledge of risk factors and the ability to determine them for individual risk prediction. However, there is a knowledge gap between evidence of increased risk and evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical preventive interventions based on increased risk. This gap is, in particular, aggravated by the extensive availability of genetic risk factor diagnostics, since the question of appropriate preventive measures immediately arises when an increased risk is identified. However, collecting proof of effective preventive measures, ideally by prospective randomized preventive studies, typically requires very long periods of time, while the knowledge about an increased risk immediately creates a high demand for action. Summary: Therefore, we propose a risk-adjusted prevention concept that is based on the best current evidence making needed and appropriate preventive measures available, and which is constantly evaluated through outcome evaluation, and continuously improved based on these results. We further discuss the structural and procedural requirements as well as legal and socioeconomical aspects relevant for the implementation of this concept.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls was evaluated.
Abstract: Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. Methods We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested for 113 DNA repair genes. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association with BC. Results Chest X-ray exposure doubled BC risk. A 3% increased BC risk per additional exposure was observed. Being 20 years old or younger at first exposure or being exposed before first full-term pregnancy did not seem to modify this risk. Birth after 1960 or carrying a rare likely deleterious coding variant in a DNA repair gene other than BRCA1/2 modified the effect of chest X-ray exposure. Conclusion Ever/never chest X-ray exposure increases BC risk 2-fold regardless of age at first exposure and, by up to 5-fold when carrying 3 or more rare variants in a DNA repair gene. Further studies are needed to evaluate other DNA repair genes or variants to identify those which could modify radiation sensitivity. Identification of subpopulations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation is important and potentially clinically relevant.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Lorraine Gueguen, Ronan Delaval, Maud Blanluet, Hervé Sartelet, Sylvie Leou, Catherine Dubois d’Enghien, Lisa Golmard, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Pascale Testevuide and Stanislas Faguer

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A gap of genetic and risk literacy in a relevant proportion of physicians and the need for appropriate training concepts in risk communication and clinical recommendations for persons at risk is demonstrated.
Abstract: Background In recent years, germline testing of women with a risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer has increased rapidly. This is due to lower costs for new high-throughput sequencing technologies and the manifold preventive and therapeutic options for germline mutation carriers. The growing demand for genetic counseling meets a shortfall of counselors and illustrates the need to involve the treating clinicians in the genetic testing process. This survey was undertaken to assess their state of knowledge and training needs in the field of genetic counseling and testing. Methods A cross-sectional survey within the European Bridges Study (Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing) was conducted among physician members (n = 111) of the German Cancer Society who were primarily gynecologists. It was designed to examine their experience in genetic counseling and testing. Results Overall, the study revealed a need for training in risk communication and clinical recommendations for persons at risk. One-third of respondents communicated only relative disease risks (31.5%) instead of absolute disease risks in manageable time spans. Moreover, almost one-third of the respondents (31.2%) communicated bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy as an option for healthy women and unilateral-diseased breast cancer patients without mutations in high-risk genes (e.g. BRCA1 or BRCA2). Most respondents expressed training needs in the field of risk assessment models, the clinical interpretation of genetic test results, and the decision-making process. Conclusion The survey demonstrates a gap of genetic and risk literacy in a relevant proportion of physicians and the need for appropriate training concepts.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the first cases of testicular stromal tumours in children carrying a DICER1 germline pathogenic variant: a case of Sertoli cell tumour and a cases of Leydig cell tumours diagnosed at 2 and 12 years of age, respectively.
Abstract: DICER1 syndrome is a rare paediatric autosomal dominant inherited disorder predisposing to various benign and malignant tumours. It is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in DICER1, and the second hit for tumour development is usually a missense hotspot pathogenic variant in the DICER1 ribonuclease IIIb domain. While DICER1 predisposing variants account for about 60% of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours, no DICER1-related testicular stromal tumours have been described. Here we report the first two cases of testicular stromal tumours in children carrying a DICER1 germline pathogenic variant: a case of Sertoli cell tumour and a case of Leydig cell tumour diagnosed at 2 and 12 years of age, respectively. A somatic DICER1 hotspot pathogenic variant was detected in the Sertoli cell tumour. This report extends the spectrum of DICER1-related tumours to include testicular Sertoli cell tumour and potentially testicular Leydig cell tumour. Diagnosis of a testicular Sertoli cell tumour should prompt DICER1 genetic testing so that patients with a DICER1 germline pathogenic variant can benefit from established surveillance guidelines. DICER1 genetic evaluation may be considered for testicular Leydig cell tumour. Our findings suggest that miRNA dysregulation underlies the aetiology of some testicular stromal tumours.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is the first study looking at clinical and genetic features of FA in Lebanon, and points to the need for establishing a national and regional registry for this condition.
Abstract: Fanconi anemia (FA) is the most common inherited bone marrow failure syndrome and presents with cytopenias, characteristic physical features, increased chromosomal breaks, and a higher risk of malignancy. Genetic features of this disease vary among different ethnic groups. We aimed to identify the incidence, outcome, overall condition, and genetic features of patients affected with FA in Lebanon to optimize management, identify the most common genes, describe new mutations, and offer prenatal diagnosis and counseling to the affected families. Over a period of 17 years, 40 patients with FA were identified in 2 major diagnostic laboratories in Lebanon. Information was obtained on their clinical course and outcome from their primary physician. DNA was available in 20 patients and was studied for underlying mutations. FANCA seemed to be the most frequent genetic alteration and 2 novel mutations, one each in FANCA and FANCG, were identified. Nine patients developed various malignancies and died. This is the first study looking at clinical and genetic features of FA in Lebanon, and points to the need for establishing a national and regional registry for this condition.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe seven tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, among eight patients with tumors with multiple BRCA1/2 variants (from 4 to 20), and all patients were managed at Institut Curie, Paris.
Abstract: Objective Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, associated with high tumor mutational burden, are good candidates for immunotherapy. However, POLE pathogenic variants are not currently screened in routine clinical practice. Can these tumors be identified by means of an already available test? Methods We describe seven tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, among eight patients with tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants (from 4 to 20). All patients were managed at Institut Curie, Paris. Five patients were selected because of unexpected tumor BRCA testing results with multiple variants and another three patients were selected because of a POLE pathogenic variant detected by large tumor testing. We looked for other tumor variants by Next-Generation Sequencing in tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants, and for multiple BRCA1/2 variants in tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant. Results Four of the five tumors selected because of multiple BRCA1/2 variants exhibited a POLE pathogenic variant, and all three tumors selected for POLE pathogenic variants exhibited multiple BRCA1/2 variants. Conclusions Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.