Institution
Tilburg University
Education•Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands•
About: Tilburg University is a education organization based out in Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 5550 authors who have published 22330 publications receiving 791335 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a framework linking firms' relative emphasis on cost leadership, product differentiation and focus strategies to firms' customer and competitor orientation as well as their new product development and introduction activity was developed.
234 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper used panel data to analyze the determinants of speaking fluency and wages of immigrants and found that subjective variables on an ordinal discrete scale, such as self-reported language ability, can suffer from misclassification errors.
Abstract: We use panel data to analyze the determinants of speaking fluency and wages of immigrants. Our model takes account of two problems that may bias OLS estimates of the impact of speaking fluency on earnings. First, subjective variables on an ordinal discrete scale, such as self-reported language ability, can suffer from misclassification errors. The model decomposes misclassification errors into a time-persistent and a time-varying component. Second, the model accounts for correlated unobserved heterogeneity in language and earnings equation, The main finding is that these two generalizations of the standard model both lead to substantial changes in the estimated effect of speaking fluency on earnings.
233 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed public pensions and child support in a model with endogenous fertility and showed that individual fertility choice may not coincide with the social optimum, due to the existence of external effects of children on society as a whole.
233 citations
••
TL;DR: The relationship between self-favoring biases in social comparison, favorable self-presentation, and well-being and the self-other asymmetry effect was examined in this paper.
Abstract: The relationship between self-favoring biases in social comparison, favorable self-presentation, and well-being and the self-other asymmetry effect was examined. Participants gave comparative chance estimations and trait ratings for positive and negative future events and traits. One-half of the participants compared themselves to the average other, while the remainder compared the average other to themselves. All participants completed measurements of two types of desirable responding (self-deception and impression management) and of subjective well-being. Participants who compared themselves to another showed stronger unrealistic optimism and illusory superiority effects for positive (but not for negative) future events und traits than participants comparing another to themselves, demonstrating a self-other asymmetry effect. Unrealistic optimism and illusory superiority concerning positive attributes were related to self-deception, while unrealistic optimism and illusory superiority concerning negative attributes were related to impression management. The relative independence of “positive” and “negative” self-favoring biases was further demonstrated by their differential relationship with self-esteem and subjective well-being.
233 citations
••
TL;DR: The meaning maintenance model (MMM) as discussed by the authors proposes that all meaning violations may bottleneck at neurocognitive and psychophysiological systems that detect and react to the experience of inconsistency, which in turn motivates compensatory behaviors.
Abstract: Across eras and literatures, multiple theories have converged on a broad psychological phenomenon: the common compensation behaviors that follow from violations of our committed understandings. The meaning maintenance model (MMM) offers an integrated account of these behaviors, as well as the overlapping perspectives that address specific aspects of this inconsistency compensation process. According to the MMM, all meaning violations may bottleneck at neurocognitive and psychophysiological systems that detect and react to the experience of inconsistency, which in turn motivates compensatory behaviors. From this perspective, compensation behaviors are understood as palliative efforts to relieve the aversive arousal that follows from any experience that is inconsistent with expected relationships—whether the meaning violation involves a perceptual anomaly or an awareness of a finite human existence. In what follows, we summarize these efforts, the assimilation, accommodation, affirmation, abstraction and as...
232 citations
Authors
Showing all 5691 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David M. Fergusson | 127 | 474 | 55992 |
Johan P. Mackenbach | 120 | 783 | 56705 |
Henning Tiemeier | 108 | 866 | 48604 |
Allen N. Berger | 106 | 382 | 65596 |
Thorsten Beck | 99 | 373 | 62708 |
Luc Laeven | 93 | 355 | 36916 |
William J. Baumol | 85 | 460 | 49603 |
Michael H. Antoni | 84 | 431 | 21878 |
Russell Spears | 84 | 336 | 31609 |
Wim Meeus | 81 | 445 | 22646 |
Daan van Knippenberg | 80 | 223 | 25272 |
Wolfgang Karl Härdle | 79 | 783 | 28934 |
Aaron Cohen | 78 | 412 | 66543 |
Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp | 74 | 178 | 36059 |
Geert Hofstede | 72 | 126 | 103728 |