scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Tilburg University

EducationTilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
About: Tilburg University is a education organization based out in Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 5550 authors who have published 22330 publications receiving 791335 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the determinants and consequences of voluntary adoption of non-local accounting principles (non-local GAAP) by firms listed and domiciled in the European Union (EU).
Abstract: This study examines the determinants and consequences of voluntary adoption of non-local accounting principles (non-local GAAP) by firms listed and domiciled in the European Union (EU). We restrict ourselves to the two predominant internationally accepted sets of accounting standards: International Accounting Standards (IAS) and United States generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP). We have used various sources to identify EU firms that use non-local GAAP. We examine the 1999 annual reports of all these firms, because accounting standard choices in more recent years may be affected by the announcement of the proposal by the European Commission in February 2001 to mandate IAS usage from 2005 on. The maintained hypothesis is that firms that voluntarily adopt IAS or US GAAP expect to experience net benefits from adoption. The finding that 133 non-financial firms in the EU voluntarily used non-local GAAP in 1999 suggests that the majority of listed EU firms does not expect to benefit from ...

297 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model is developed which confirms this point but also draws attention to some general mechanisms that relax the trade-off considerably, which will increase average productivity and will have positive effects on the marginal decrease of profits and environmental damage.

296 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the impact of government indebtedness and deficits on bank stock prices and CDS spreads was investigated for an international sample of banks, and the results suggest that some systemically important banks can increase their value by downsizing or splitting up, as they have become too big to save, potentially reversing the trend to ever larger banks.
Abstract: Deteriorating public finances around the world raise doubts about countries’ abilities to bail out their largest banks. For an international sample of banks, this paper investigates the impact of government indebtedness and deficits on bank stock prices and CDS spreads. Overall, bank stock prices reflect a negative capitalization of government debt and they respond negatively to deficits. We present evidence that in 2008 systemically large banks saw a reduction in their market valuation in countries running large fiscal deficits. Furthermore, the change in bank CDS spreads in 2008 relative to 2007 reflects countries’ deterioration of public deficits. Our results suggest that some systemically important banks can increase their value by downsizing or splitting up, as they have become too big to save, potentially reversing the trend to ever larger banks. We also document that a smaller proportion of banks are systemically important - relative to GDP - in 2008 than in the two previous years, which could reflect these private incentives to downsize.

296 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel Lakens1, Federico Adolfi2, Federico Adolfi3, Casper J. Albers4, Farid Anvari5, Matthew A. J. Apps6, Shlomo Argamon7, Thom Baguley8, Raymond Becker9, Stephen D. Benning10, Daniel E. Bradford11, Erin Michelle Buchanan12, Aaron R. Caldwell13, Ben Van Calster14, Ben Van Calster15, Rickard Carlsson16, Sau-Chin Chen17, Bryan Chung18, Lincoln J. Colling19, Gary S. Collins6, Zander Crook20, Emily S. Cross21, Emily S. Cross22, Sameera Daniels, Henrik Danielsson23, Lisa M. DeBruine22, Daniel J. Dunleavy24, Brian D. Earp25, Michele I. Feist26, Jason D. Ferrell27, Jason D. Ferrell28, James G. Field29, Nicholas W. Fox30, Amanda Friesen31, Caio Gomes, Monica Gonzalez-Marquez32, James A. Grange33, Andrew P. Grieve, Robert Guggenberger34, James T. Grist19, Anne-Laura van Harmelen19, Fred Hasselman35, Kevin D. Hochard36, Mark R. Hoffarth37, Nicholas P. Holmes38, Michael Ingre39, Peder M. Isager23, Hanna K. Isotalus40, Christer Johansson41, Konrad Juszczyk42, David A. Kenny43, Ahmed A. Khalil44, Ahmed A. Khalil45, Ahmed A. Khalil2, Barbara Konat42, Junpeng Lao46, Erik Gahner Larsen47, Gerine M.A. Lodder4, Jiří Lukavský48, Christopher R. Madan38, David Manheim49, Stephen R. Martin50, Andrea E. Martin20, Andrea E. Martin2, Deborah G. Mayo51, Randy J. McCarthy52, Kevin McConway53, Colin McFarland, Amanda Q. X. Nio54, Gustav Nilsonne55, Gustav Nilsonne56, Gustav Nilsonne57, Cilene Lino de Oliveira58, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry14, Sam Parsons6, Gerit Pfuhl59, Kimberly A. Quinn60, John J. Sakon37, S. Adil Saribay61, Iris K. Schneider62, Manojkumar Selvaraju63, Zsuzsika Sjoerds15, Samuel G. Smith64, Tim Smits14, Jeffrey R. Spies65, Jeffrey R. Spies66, Vishnu Sreekumar67, Crystal N. Steltenpohl68, Neil Stenhouse11, Wojciech Świątkowski, Miguel A. Vadillo69, Marcel A.L.M. van Assen70, Marcel A.L.M. van Assen71, Matt N. Williams72, Samantha E Williams73, Donald R. Williams74, Tal Yarkoni28, Ignazio Ziano75, Rolf A. Zwaan39 
Eindhoven University of Technology1, Max Planck Society2, National Scientific and Technical Research Council3, University of Groningen4, Flinders University5, University of Oxford6, Illinois Institute of Technology7, Nottingham Trent University8, Bielefeld University9, University of Nevada, Las Vegas10, University of Wisconsin-Madison11, Missouri State University12, University of Arkansas13, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven14, Leiden University15, Linnaeus University16, Tzu Chi University17, University of British Columbia18, University of Cambridge19, University of Edinburgh20, Bangor University21, University of Glasgow22, Linköping University23, Florida State University24, Yale University25, University of Louisiana at Lafayette26, St. Edward's University27, University of Texas at Austin28, West Virginia University29, Rutgers University30, Indiana University31, RWTH Aachen University32, Keele University33, University of Tübingen34, Radboud University Nijmegen35, University of Chester36, New York University37, University of Nottingham38, Erasmus University Rotterdam39, University of Bristol40, Sahlgrenska University Hospital41, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań42, University of Connecticut43, Charité44, Humboldt University of Berlin45, University of Fribourg46, University of Kent47, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic48, RAND Corporation49, Baylor University50, Virginia Tech51, Northern Illinois University52, Open University53, King's College London54, Karolinska Institutet55, Stockholm University56, Stanford University57, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina58, University of Tromsø59, DePaul University60, Boğaziçi University61, University of Cologne62, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology63, University of Leeds64, Center for Open Science65, University of Virginia66, National Institutes of Health67, University of Southern Indiana68, Autonomous University of Madrid69, Utrecht University70, Tilburg University71, Massey University72, Saint Louis University73, University of California, Davis74, Ghent University75
TL;DR: In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, it is proposed that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
Abstract: In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, we propose that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.

296 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate how leading companies in North America, Europe, and Asia develop and sustain strong talent pipelines, and find that competitive advantage comes not primarily from designing and implementing best practices but rather from the proper internal alignment of various elements of a company's talent management system.
Abstract: To determine how leading companies in North America, Europe, and Asia develop and sustain strong talent pipelines, this research investigates talent management processes and practices in a sample of 37 multinational corporations, selected on the basis of their international scope, reputation, and long-term performance. In-depth case studies and a Web-based survey of human resources professionals identify various effective practices that can help companies attract, select, develop, and retain talent. However, the results suggest that competitive advantage comes not primarily from designing and implementing best practices but rather from the proper internal alignment of various elements of a company's talent management system, as well as their embeddedness in the value system of the firm, their links to business strategy, and their global coordination.

296 citations


Authors

Showing all 5691 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David M. Fergusson12747455992
Johan P. Mackenbach12078356705
Henning Tiemeier10886648604
Allen N. Berger10638265596
Thorsten Beck9937362708
Luc Laeven9335536916
William J. Baumol8546049603
Michael H. Antoni8443121878
Russell Spears8433631609
Wim Meeus8144522646
Daan van Knippenberg8022325272
Wolfgang Karl Härdle7978328934
Aaron Cohen7841266543
Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp7417836059
Geert Hofstede72126103728
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Maastricht University
53.2K papers, 2.2M citations

91% related

VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

89% related

Erasmus University Rotterdam
91.2K papers, 4.5M citations

88% related

University of Groningen
69.1K papers, 2.9M citations

88% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202369
2022205
20211,274
20201,206
20191,097
20181,038