scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Colorado Boulder

EducationBoulder, Colorado, United States
About: University of Colorado Boulder is a education organization based out in Boulder, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 48794 authors who have published 115151 publications receiving 5387328 citations. The organization is also known as: CU Boulder & UCB.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Ali H. Mokdad1, Katherine Ballestros1, Michelle Echko1, Scott D Glenn1, Helen E Olsen1, Erin C Mullany1, Alexander Lee1, Abdur Rahman Khan2, Alireza Ahmadi3, Alireza Ahmadi4, Alize J. Ferrari5, Alize J. Ferrari1, Alize J. Ferrari6, Amir Kasaeian7, Andrea Werdecker, Austin Carter1, Ben Zipkin1, Benn Sartorius8, Benn Sartorius9, Berrin Serdar10, Bryan L. Sykes11, Christopher Troeger1, Christina Fitzmaurice12, Christina Fitzmaurice1, Colin D. Rehm13, Damian Santomauro1, Damian Santomauro6, Damian Santomauro5, Daniel Kim14, Danny V. Colombara1, David C. Schwebel15, Derrick Tsoi1, Dhaval Kolte16, Elaine O. Nsoesie1, Emma Nichols1, Eyal Oren17, Fiona J Charlson6, Fiona J Charlson1, Fiona J Charlson5, George C Patton18, Gregory A. Roth1, H. Dean Hosgood19, Harvey Whiteford5, Harvey Whiteford6, Harvey Whiteford1, Hmwe H Kyu1, Holly E. Erskine6, Holly E. Erskine1, Holly E. Erskine5, Hsiang Huang20, Ira Martopullo1, Jasvinder A. Singh15, Jean B. Nachega21, Jean B. Nachega22, Jean B. Nachega23, Juan Sanabria24, Juan Sanabria25, Kaja Abbas26, Kanyin Ong1, Karen M. Tabb27, Kristopher J. Krohn1, Leslie Cornaby1, Louisa Degenhardt1, Louisa Degenhardt28, Mark Moses1, Maryam S. Farvid29, Max Griswold1, Michael H. Criqui30, Michelle L. Bell31, Minh Nguyen1, Mitch T Wallin32, Mitch T Wallin33, Mojde Mirarefin1, Mostafa Qorbani, Mustafa Z. Younis34, Nancy Fullman1, Patrick Liu1, Paul S Briant1, Philimon Gona35, Rasmus Havmoller3, Ricky Leung36, Ruth W Kimokoti37, Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi38, Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi39, Simon I. Hay40, Simon I. Hay1, Simon Yadgir1, Stan Biryukov1, Stein Emil Vollset1, Stein Emil Vollset41, Tahiya Alam1, Tahvi Frank1, Talha Farid2, Ted R. Miller42, Ted R. Miller43, Theo Vos1, Till Bärnighausen29, Till Bärnighausen44, Tsegaye Telwelde Gebrehiwot45, Yuichiro Yano46, Ziyad Al-Aly47, Alem Mehari48, Alexis J. Handal49, Amit Kandel50, Ben Anderson51, Brian J. Biroscak31, Brian J. Biroscak52, Dariush Mozaffarian53, E. Ray Dorsey54, Eric L. Ding29, Eun-Kee Park55, Gregory R. Wagner29, Guoqing Hu56, Honglei Chen57, Jacob E. Sunshine51, Jagdish Khubchandani58, Janet L Leasher59, Janni Leung5, Janni Leung51, Joshua A. Salomon29, Jürgen Unützer51, Leah E. Cahill60, Leah E. Cahill29, Leslie T. Cooper61, Masako Horino, Michael Brauer62, Michael Brauer1, Nicholas J K Breitborde63, Peter J. Hotez64, Roman Topor-Madry65, Roman Topor-Madry66, Samir Soneji67, Saverio Stranges68, Spencer L. James1, Stephen M. Amrock69, Sudha Jayaraman70, Tejas V. Patel, Tomi Akinyemiju15, Vegard Skirbekk71, Vegard Skirbekk41, Yohannes Kinfu72, Zulfiqar A Bhutta73, Jost B. Jonas44, Christopher J L Murray1 
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation1, University of Louisville2, Karolinska Institutet3, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences4, University of Queensland5, Centre for Mental Health6, Tehran University of Medical Sciences7, South African Medical Research Council8, University of KwaZulu-Natal9, University of Colorado Boulder10, University of California, Irvine11, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center12, Montefiore Medical Center13, Northeastern University14, University of Alabama at Birmingham15, Brown University16, San Diego State University17, University of Melbourne18, Albert Einstein College of Medicine19, Cambridge Health Alliance20, University of Cape Town21, University of Pittsburgh22, Johns Hopkins University23, Case Western Reserve University24, Marshall University25, University of London26, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign27, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre28, Harvard University29, University of California, San Diego30, Yale University31, Veterans Health Administration32, Georgetown University33, Jackson State University34, University of Massachusetts Boston35, State University of New York System36, Simmons College37, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science38, University of California, Los Angeles39, University of Oxford40, Norwegian Institute of Public Health41, Curtin University42, Pacific Institute43, Heidelberg University44, Jimma University45, Northwestern University46, Washington University in St. Louis47, Howard University48, University of New Mexico49, University at Buffalo50, University of Washington51, University of South Florida52, Tufts University53, University of Rochester Medical Center54, Kosin University55, Central South University56, Michigan State University57, Ball State University58, Nova Southeastern University59, Dalhousie University60, Mayo Clinic61, University of British Columbia62, Ohio State University63, Baylor University64, Wrocław Medical University65, Jagiellonian University Medical College66, Dartmouth College67, University of Western Ontario68, Oregon Health & Science University69, Virginia Commonwealth University70, Columbia University71, University of Canberra72, Aga Khan University73
10 Apr 2018-JAMA
TL;DR: There are wide differences in the burden of disease at the state level and specific diseases and risk factors, such as drug use disorders, high BMI, poor diet, high fasting plasma glucose level, and alcohol use disorders are increasing and warrant increased attention.
Abstract: Introduction Several studies have measured health outcomes in the United States, but none have provided a comprehensive assessment of patterns of health by state. Objective To use the results of the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to report trends in the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors at the state level from 1990 to 2016. Design and Setting A systematic analysis of published studies and available data sources estimates the burden of disease by age, sex, geography, and year. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence, incidence, mortality, life expectancy, healthy life expectancy (HALE), years of life lost (YLLs) due to premature mortality, years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 causes and 84 risk factors with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were computed. Results Between 1990 and 2016, overall death rates in the United States declined from 745.2 (95% UI, 740.6 to 749.8) per 100 000 persons to 578.0 (95% UI, 569.4 to 587.1) per 100 000 persons. The probability of death among adults aged 20 to 55 years declined in 31 states and Washington, DC from 1990 to 2016. In 2016, Hawaii had the highest life expectancy at birth (81.3 years) and Mississippi had the lowest (74.7 years), a 6.6-year difference. Minnesota had the highest HALE at birth (70.3 years), and West Virginia had the lowest (63.8 years), a 6.5-year difference. The leading causes of DALYs in the United States for 1990 and 2016 were ischemic heart disease and lung cancer, while the third leading cause in 1990 was low back pain, and the third leading cause in 2016 was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Opioid use disorders moved from the 11th leading cause of DALYs in 1990 to the 7th leading cause in 2016, representing a 74.5% (95% UI, 42.8% to 93.9%) change. In 2016, each of the following 6 risks individually accounted for more than 5% of risk-attributable DALYs: tobacco consumption, high body mass index (BMI), poor diet, alcohol and drug use, high fasting plasma glucose, and high blood pressure. Across all US states, the top risk factors in terms of attributable DALYs were due to 1 of the 3 following causes: tobacco consumption (32 states), high BMI (10 states), or alcohol and drug use (8 states). Conclusions and Relevance There are wide differences in the burden of disease at the state level. Specific diseases and risk factors, such as drug use disorders, high BMI, poor diet, high fasting plasma glucose level, and alcohol use disorders are increasing and warrant increased attention. These data can be used to inform national health priorities for research, clinical care, and policy.

962 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The IOC expert working group introduces a broader, more comprehensive term for the condition previously known as ‘Female Athlete Triad’, ‘Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport’ (RED-S), and recommends practical clinical models for the management of affected athletes.
Abstract: Protecting the health of the athlete is a goal of the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The IOC convened an expert panel to update the 2005 IOC Consensus Statement on the Female Athlete Triad. This Consensus Statement replaces the previous and provides guidelines to guide risk assessment, treatment and return-to-play decisions. The IOC expert working group introduces a broader, more comprehensive term for the condition previously known as ‘Female Athlete Triad’. The term ‘Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport’ (RED-S), points to the complexity involved and the fact that male athletes are also affected. The syndrome of RED-S refers to impaired physiological function including, but not limited to, metabolic rate, menstrual function, bone health, immunity, protein synthesis, cardiovascular health caused by relative energy deficiency. The cause of this syndrome is energy deficiency relative to the balance between dietary energy intake and energy expenditure required for health and activities of daily living, growth and sporting activities. Psychological consequences can either precede RED-S or be the result of RED-S. The clinical phenomenon is not a ‘triad’ of the three entities of energy availability, menstrual function and bone health, but rather a syndrome that affects many aspects of physiological function, health and athletic performance. This Consensus Statement also recommends practical clinical models for the management of affected athletes. The ‘Sport Risk Assessment and Return to Play Model’ categorises the syndrome into three groups and translates these classifications into clinical recommendations.

962 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Sep 2012-Nature
TL;DR: These findings suggest that tropical protected areas are often intimately linked ecologically to their surrounding habitats, and that a failure to stem broad-scale loss and degradation of such habitats could sharply increase the likelihood of serious biodiversity declines.
Abstract: The rapid disruption of tropical forests probably imperils global biodiversity more than any other contemporary phenomenon(1-3). With deforestation advancing quickly, protected areas are increasingly becoming final refuges for threatened species and natural ecosystem processes. However, many protected areas in the tropics are themselves vulnerable to human encroachment and other environmental stresses(4-9). As pressures mount, it is vital to know whether existing reserves can sustain their biodiversity. A critical constraint in addressing this question has been that data describing a broad array of biodiversity groups have been unavailable for a sufficiently large and representative sample of reserves. Here we present a uniquely comprehensive data set on changes over the past 20 to 30 years in 31 functional groups of species and 21 potential drivers of environmental change, for 60 protected areas stratified across the world's major tropical regions. Our analysis reveals great variation in reserve 'health': about half of all reserves have been effective or performed passably, but the rest are experiencing an erosion of biodiversity that is often alarmingly widespread taxonomically and functionally. Habitat disruption, hunting and forest-product exploitation were the strongest predictors of declining reserve health. Crucially, environmental changes immediately outside reserves seemed nearly as important as those inside in determining their ecological fate, with changes inside reserves strongly mirroring those occurring around them. These findings suggest that tropical protected areas are often intimately linked ecologically to their surrounding habitats, and that a failure to stem broad-scale loss and degradation of such habitats could sharply increase the likelihood of serious biodiversity declines.

962 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recommendations are made on how accelerated testing should be performed to rapidly develop solar cells that are both extraordinarily efficient and stable.
Abstract: This review article examines the current state of understanding in how metal halide perovskite solar cells can degrade when exposed to moisture, oxygen, heat, light, mechanical stress, and reverse bias. It also highlights strategies for improving stability, such as tuning the composition of the perovskite, introducing hydrophobic coatings, replacing metal electrodes with carbon or transparent conducting oxides, and packaging. The article concludes with recommendations on how accelerated testing should be performed to rapidly develop solar cells that are both extraordinarily efficient and stable.

962 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe a Markov method for process discovery, as well as two additional methods that are adopted from other domains and augmented for their purposes, and compare the methods and discuss their application in an industrial case study.
Abstract: Many software process methods and tools presuppose the existence of a formal model of a process. Unfortunately, developing a formal model for an on-going, complex process can be difficult, costly, and error prone. This presents a practical barrier to the adoption of process technologies, which would be lowered by automated assistance in creating formal models. To this end, we have developed a data analysis technique that we term process discovery. Under this technique, data describing process events are first captured from an on-going process and then used to generate a formal model of the behavior of that process. In this article we describe a Markov method that we developed specifically for process discovery, as well as describe two additional methods that we adopted from other domains and augmented for our purposes. The three methods range from the purely algorithmic to the purely statistical. We compare the methods and discuss their application in an industrial case study.

962 citations


Authors

Showing all 49233 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yi Chen2174342293080
Robert J. Lefkowitz214860147995
Rob Knight2011061253207
Charles A. Dinarello1901058139668
Jie Zhang1784857221720
David Haussler172488224960
Bradley Cox1692150156200
Gang Chen1673372149819
Rodney S. Ruoff164666194902
Menachem Elimelech15754795285
Jay Hauser1552145132683
Robert E. W. Hancock15277588481
Robert Plomin151110488588
Thomas E. Starzl150162591704
Rajesh Kumar1494439140830
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

96% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

96% related

University of California, Los Angeles
282.4K papers, 15.7M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023164
2022780
20216,287
20206,493
20196,063
20185,522