scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Vanderbilt University

EducationNashville, Tennessee, United States
About: Vanderbilt University is a education organization based out in Nashville, Tennessee, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 45066 authors who have published 106528 publications receiving 5435039 citations. The organization is also known as: Vandy.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This perspective article seeks to clarify which cells fall under the NKT-cell umbrella, and which might be best considered as separate.
Abstract: Recent years have seen so-called natural killer T (NKT) cells emerge as important regulators of the immune response. The existence of NKT-cell subsets, and other types of T cell that resemble NKT cells, is an ongoing source of confusion in the literature. This perspective article seeks to clarify which cells fall under the NKT-cell umbrella, and which might be best considered as separate.

1,134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a large hand-collected dataset from 2001 to 2006 to find that hedge funds in the U.S. propose strategic, operational, and financial remedies and attain success or partial success in two thirds of the cases.
Abstract: Using a large hand-collected dataset from 2001 to 2006, we find that activist hedge funds in the U.S. propose strategic, operational, and financial remedies and attain success or partial success in two thirds of the cases. Hedge funds seldom seek control and in most cases are nonconfrontational. The abnormal return around the announcement of activism is approximately 7%, with no reversal during the subsequent year. Target firms experience increases in payout, operating performance, and higher CEO turnover after activism. Our analysis provides important new evidence on the mechanisms and effects of informed shareholder monitoring.

1,134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Joshua A. Salomon1, Theo Vos, Daniel R Hogan1, Michael L. Gagnon1, Mohsen Naghavi2, Ali Mokdad2, Nazma Begum3, Razibuzzaman Shah1, Muhammad Karyana, Soewarta Kosen, Mario Reyna Farje, Gilberto Moncada, Arup Dutta, Sunil Sazawal, Andrew Dyer4, Jason F. S. Seiler4, Victor Aboyans, Lesley Baker2, Amanda J Baxter5, Emelia J. Benjamin6, Kavi Bhalla1, Aref A. Bin Abdulhak, Fiona M. Blyth, Rupert R A Bourne, Tasanee Braithwaite7, Peter Brooks, Traolach S. Brugha8, Claire Bryan-Hancock, Rachelle Buchbinder, Peter Burney9, Bianca Calabria10, Honglei Chen11, Sumeet S. Chugh12, Rebecca Cooley2, Michael H. Criqui13, Marita Cross5, Kaustubh Dabhadkar, Nabila Dahodwala14, Adrian Davis15, Louisa Degenhardt16, Cesar Diaz-Torne17, E. Ray Dorsey3, Tim Driscoll, Karen Edmond18, Alexis Elbaz19, Majid Ezzati20, Valery L. Feigin21, Cleusa P. Ferri22, Abraham D. Flaxman2, Louise Flood8, Marlene Fransen, Kana Fuse, Belinda J. Gabbe23, Richard F. Gillum24, Juanita A. Haagsma25, James Harrison8, Rasmus Havmoeller16, Roderick J. Hay26, Abdullah Hel-Baqui, Hans W. Hoek27, Howard J. Hoffman28, Emily Hogeland29, Damian G Hoy5, Deborah Jarvis2, Ganesan Karthikeyan1, Lisa M. Knowlton30, Tim Lathlean8, Janet L Leasher31, Stephen S Lim2, Steven E. Lipshultz32, Alan D. Lopez, Rafael Lozano2, Ronan A Lyons33, Reza Malekzadeh, Wagner Marcenes, Lyn March6, David J. Margolis14, Neil McGill, John J. McGrath34, George A. Mensah35, Ana-Claire Meyer, Catherine Michaud36, Andrew E. Moran, Rintaro Mori37, Michele E. Murdoch38, Luigi Naldi39, Charles R. Newton12, Rosana E. Norman, Saad B. Omer40, Richard H. Osborne, Neil Pearce18, Fernando Perez-Ruiz, Norberto Perico41, Konrad Pesudovs8, David Phillips42, Farshad Pourmalek43, Martin Prince, Jürgen Rehm, G. Remuzzi41, Kathryn Richardson, Robin Room44, Sukanta Saha45, Uchechukwu Sampson, Lidia Sanchez-Riera46, Maria Segui-Gomez47, Saeid Shahraz48, Kenji Shibuya, David Singh49, Karen Sliwa50, Emma Smith50, Isabelle Soerjomataram51, Timothy J. Steiner, Wilma A. Stolk, Lars Jacob Stovner, Christopher R. Sudfeld1, Hugh R. Taylor, Imad M. Tleyjeh4, Marieke J. van der Werf52, Wendy L. Watson53, David J. Weatherall12, Robert G. Weintraub, Marc G. Weisskopf1, Harvey Whiteford, James D. Wilkinson32, Anthony D. Woolf52, Zhi-Jie Zheng54, Christopher J L Murray2 
Harvard University1, University of Queensland2, Johns Hopkins University3, ICF International4, Centre for Mental Health5, Boston University6, University of Sydney7, University of Melbourne8, Imperial College London9, University of New South Wales10, University of California, San Diego11, Emory University12, University of Pennsylvania13, Autonomous University of Barcelona14, University of London15, National Institutes of Health16, French Institute of Health and Medical Research17, Medical Research Council18, Auckland University of Technology19, Federal University of São Paulo20, National Institute of Population and Social Security Research21, Howard University22, Flinders University23, Erasmus University Rotterdam24, King's College London25, Karolinska Institutet26, University of California, San Francisco27, All India Institute of Medical Sciences28, Nova Southeastern University29, University of Miami30, Swansea University31, Tehran University of Medical Sciences32, Queen Mary University of London33, Allen Institute for Brain Science34, University of Cape Town35, Columbia University36, Watford General Hospital37, Centro Studi GISED38, University of Oxford39, Deakin University40, University of British Columbia41, University of Toronto42, Box Hill Hospital43, Vanderbilt University44, University of Washington45, Brandeis University46, University of Tokyo47, The Queen's Medical Center48, Norwegian University of Science and Technology49, China Medical Board50, University of Cambridge51, Royal Cornwall Hospital52, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center53, Shanghai Jiao Tong University54
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive re-estimation of disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 through a large-scale empirical investigation in which judgments about health losses associated with many causes of disease and injury were elicited from the general public in diverse communities through a new, standardised approach.

1,130 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that in skeletal muscle of both rodents and humans, a diet high in fat increases the H(2)O(2)-emitting potential of mitochondria, shifts the cellular redox environment to a more oxidized state, and decreases the redox-buffering capacity in the absence of any change in mitochondrial respiratory function.
Abstract: High dietary fat intake leads to insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, and this represents a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress have been implicated in the disease process, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. Here we show that in skeletal muscle of both rodents and humans, a diet high in fat increases the H2O2-emitting potential of mitochondria, shifts the cellular redox environment to a more oxidized state, and decreases the redox-buffering capacity in the absence of any change in mitochondrial respiratory function. Furthermore, we show that attenuating mitochondrial H2O2 emission, either by treating rats with a mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant or by genetically engineering the overexpression of catalase in mitochondria of muscle in mice, completely preserves insulin sensitivity despite a high-fat diet. These findings place the etiology of insulin resistance in the context of mitochondrial bioenergetics by demonstrating that mitochondrial H2O2 emission serves as both a gauge of energy balance and a regulator of cellular redox environment, linking intracellular metabolic balance to the control of insulin sensitivity.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations


Authors

Showing all 45403 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
Robert M. Califf1961561167961
Matthew Meyerson194553243726
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Tony Hunter175593124726
David R. Jacobs1651262113892
Donald E. Ingber164610100682
L. Joseph Melton16153197861
Ralph A. DeFronzo160759132993
David W. Bates1591239116698
Charles N. Serhan15872884810
David Cella1561258106402
Jay Hauser1552145132683
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

98% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

97% related

Johns Hopkins University
249.2K papers, 14M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023141
2022541
20215,134
20205,232
20194,883
20184,649