scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors present an agenda for the engagement of the social sciences with microbiome research and its implications for public policy and social change, based on existing multidisciplinary science-policy agenda-setting exercises.
Abstract
The human microbiome is an important emergent area of cross, multi and transdisciplinary study. The complexity of this topic leads to conflicting narratives and regulatory challenges. It raises questions about the benefits of its commercialisation and drives debates about alternative models for engaging with its publics, patients and other potential beneficiaries. The social sciences and the humanities have begun to explore the microbiome as an object of empirical study and as an opportunity for theoretical innovation. They can play an important role in facilitating the development of research that is socially relevant, that incorporates cultural norms and expectations around microbes and that investigates how social and biological lives intersect. This is a propitious moment to establish lines of collaboration in the study of the microbiome that incorporate the concerns and capabilities of the social sciences and the humanities together with those of the natural sciences and relevant stakeholders outside academia. This paper presents an agenda for the engagement of the social sciences with microbiome research and its implications for public policy and social change. Our methods were informed by existing multidisciplinary science-policy agenda-setting exercises. We recruited 36 academics and stakeholders and asked them to produce a list of important questions about the microbiome that were in need of further social science research. We refined this initial list into an agenda of 32 questions and organised them into eight themes that both complement and extend existing research trajectories. This agenda was further developed through a structured workshop where 21 of our participants refined the agenda and reflected on the challenges and the limitations of the exercise itself. The agenda identifies the need for research that addresses the implications of the human microbiome for human health, public health, public and private sector research and notions of self and identity. It also suggests new lines of research sensitive to the complexity and heterogeneity of human–microbiome relations, and how these intersect with questions of environmental governance, social and spatial inequality and public engagement with science.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Race in the Microbiome

TL;DR: This research is examined to argue that social scientists must work with biological scientists to help put microbial differences into perspective and investigate how microbiomes and race are entangled embodiments of the social, environmental, and biological.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: Considering the Microbial Components of Social, Environmental, and Health Justice.

TL;DR: The Microbes and Social Equity (MSE) Working Group connects microbiology with social equity research, education, policy, and practice to understand the interplay of microorganisms, individuals, societies, and ecosystems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating interdisciplinary collaboration: theory and practice across disciplines

TL;DR: The editors of Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration as mentioned in this paper contribute to an admittedly rather bloated literature on interdisciplinarity by showcasing empirically rigorous examinations of the acadias' interdisciplinary collaboration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the results of an iterative research prioritisation process carried out to enhance capacity, mutual understanding and impact amongst European social sciences and humanities researchers, which produced 15 research questions from an initial list of 100 and classified under the following five themes: (1) debating and visioning food from animals; (2) transforming agricultural spaces; (3) framing animals as food; (4) eating practices and identities; (5) governing transitions beyond animal-based food systems).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern

Bruno Latour
- 01 Jan 2004 - 
TL;DR: The critical spirit of the humanities has run out of steam as discussed by the authors and the critical spirit might not be aiming at the right target, which is a concern of ours as a whole.
Journal ArticleDOI

Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut

TL;DR: The current genomic revolution offers an unprecedented opportunity to identify the molecular foundations of symbionts and commensals so that the authors can understand how they contribute to their normal physiology and how they can be exploited to develop new therapeutic strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI

A framework for human microbiome research

Barbara A. Methé, +253 more
- 14 Jun 2012 - 
TL;DR: The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) Consortium has established a population-scale framework which catalyzed significant development of metagenomic protocols resulting in a broad range of quality-controlled resources and data including standardized methods for creating, processing and interpreting distinct types of high-throughput metagenomics data available to the scientific community as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing a framework for responsible innovation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework for understanding and supporting efforts aimed at "responsibly innovation" in emerging science and innovation, which is a major challenge for contemporary democracies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current understanding of the human microbiome.

TL;DR: This review focuses on studies in humans to describe challenges and propose strategies that leverage existing knowledge to move rapidly from correlation to causation and ultimately to translation into therapies.
Related Papers (5)