scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Working with Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in large‐scale ecological assessments: Reviewing the experience of the IPBES Global Assessment

TLDR
The Global Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (GA) as discussed by the authors was the first global scale assessment to systematically engage with ILK and issues of concern to Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC).
Abstract
There have been calls for greater inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in applied ecosystems research and ecological assessments. The Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Global Assessment (GA) is the first global scale assessment to systematically engage with ILK and issues of concern to Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC). In this paper, we review and reflect on how the GA worked with ILK and lessons learned. The GA engaged in critical evaluation and synthesis of existing evidence from multiple sources, using several deliberative steps: having specific authors and questions focus on ILK; integrating inputs from ILK across all chapters; organizing dialogue workshops; issuing calls for contributions to identify other forms and systems of knowledge; and encouraging IPLC to be key stakeholders and contributors. We identify content areas where attention to ILK was particularly important for questions in applied ecology. These include: (a) enriching understandings of nature and its contributions to people, including ecosystem services; (b) assisting in assessing and monitoring ecosystem change; (c) contributing to international targets and scenario development to achieve global goals like the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and the Sustainable Development Goals and (d) generating inclusive and policy‐relevant options for people and nature. However, challenges in engaging different knowledge systems were also encountered. Policy implications. The Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Global Assessment (GA) demonstrated the importance of Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC) to global biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. Initiatives seeking to engage Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) can learn from the experience of the GA. Successfully bringing ILK into assessment processes and policy arenas requires a deliberate framework and approach from the start that facilitates recognition of different knowledge systems, identifies questions relevant at various scales, mobilizes funding and recognizes time required and engages networks of stakeholders with diverse worldviews. In turn, fostering inclusion of ILK and partnering with IPLC can help future assessments understand how natural and cultural systems co‐produce each other, identify trends of change through diverse biocultural indicators and improve sustainable development goals and policies.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Creating Synergies between Citizen Science and Indigenous and Local Knowledge

TL;DR: This article explored the connection between CS and Indigenous and local knowledge in ecosystem stewardship and conservation and demonstrated approaches for how CS can generate useful knowledge while at the same time strengthening ILK systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of evidence-based conservation in the Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management

TL;DR: In this article, the role of traditional ecological knowledge in monitoring, responding to, and managing ecosystem processes and functions, with special attention to ecological resilience, was surveyed and case studies revealed that there exists a diversity of local or traditional practices for ecosystem management, including multiple species management, resource rotation, succession management, landscape patchiness management, and other ways of responding to and managing pulses and ecological surprises.
Journal ArticleDOI

The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people

Sandra Díaz, +83 more
TL;DR: The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework as discussed by the authors, which will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing nature's contributions to people

TL;DR: The notion of nature's contributions to people (NCP) was introduced by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) as mentioned in this paper, a joint global effort by governments, academia, and civil society to assess and promote knowledge of Earth's biodiversity and ecosystems and their contribution to human societies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach

Unai Pascual, +51 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so, and argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management

TL;DR: In this article, a combination of traditional ecological knowledge and science to monitor populations can greatly assist co-management for sustainable customary wildlife harvests by indigenous peoples, which can not only build partnership and community consensus, but also allow indigenous wildlife users to critically evaluate scientific predictions on their own terms and test sustainability using their own forms of adaptive management.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How the indigenous and local knowledge ILK is been researched?

The IPBES Global Assessment engaged with Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) by integrating inputs from ILK across all chapters and organizing dialogue workshops.