scispace - formally typeset
O

Olafur O Gudmundsson

Researcher at University of Iceland

Publications -  19
Citations -  3265

Olafur O Gudmundsson is an academic researcher from University of Iceland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder & Genome-wide association study. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 15 publications receiving 2188 citations. Previous affiliations of Olafur O Gudmundsson include Niels Bohr Institute & deCODE genetics.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Ditte Demontis, +126 more
- 01 Jan 2019 - 
TL;DR: A genome-wide association meta-analysis of 20,183 individuals diagnosed with ADHD and 35,191 controls identifies variants surpassing genome- wide significance in 12 independent loci and implicates neurodevelopmental pathways and conserved regions of the genome as being involved in underlying ADHD biology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

Phil Lee, +606 more
- 12 Dec 2019 - 
TL;DR: Genetic influences on psychiatric disorders transcend diagnostic boundaries, suggesting substantial pleiotropy of contributing loci within genes that show heightened expression in the brain throughout the lifespan, beginning prenatally in the second trimester, and play prominent roles in neurodevelopmental processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maximizing biomass productivity and cell density of Chlorella vulgaris by using light-emitting diode-based photobioreactor.

TL;DR: Growth results were improved under the less expensive light of 660 nm LEDs, and illumination was augmented by optimization at systematic level, providing for a biomass productivity of up to 2.11 gDCW/L/day, the best results ever reported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validity of Self-Report and Informant Rating Scales of Adult ADHD Symptoms in Comparison With a Semistructured Diagnostic Interview

TL;DR: It was concluded that the rating scales have good psychometric properties, at least in at-risk populations, and predicted interview-based diagnoses in childhood and adulthood with adequate sensitivities and specificities.