scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Colorado Colorado Springs

EducationColorado Springs, Colorado, United States
About: University of Colorado Colorado Springs is a education organization based out in Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 6664 authors who have published 10872 publications receiving 323416 citations. The organization is also known as: UCCS & University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors attempted to measure potential changes in teacher knowledge and practice as a result of an intervention, as well as trace such changes through a theoretical path of in...
Abstract: In this exploratory study, we attempted to measure potential changes in teacher knowledge and practice as a result of an intervention, as well as trace such changes through a theoretical path of in...

144 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Knee and ankle joint laxities are greater for women compared to men; however, the cyclic estradiol and progesterone fluctuations that occur during the menstrual cycle do not produce cyclic fluctuations of joint laxity.
Abstract: BackgroundFemale athletes suffer a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries compared to their male counterparts, and they appear to be at increased risk for these injuries when they have increased anterior-posterior knee laxity and at specific phases of the menstrual cycle. Although the mechanism by which these factors combine to increase injury risk is unclear, studies suggest that cyclic variations in joint laxity produced by hormone fluctuation during the menstrual cycle pre-dispose an athlete to increased risk of ligamentous injury. Little is known about whether joint laxity varies cyclically during the menstrual cycle and if so, whether it is modulated by cyclic variations of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4).HypothesisIncreased serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels are associated with increased ankle and knee joint laxity.Study DesignCohort study. Level of evidence, 2.MethodsAnkle laxity, anterior-posterior knee laxity, and serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) and pro...

144 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Response suppression of midlatency auditory event related potential components was compared to the mismatch negativity and to self-rated indices of stimulus filtering and passive attention-switching phenomena in an age-restricted sample of healthy adults to suggest that the ERP components investigated are not redundant, but correspond to distinct-possibly related-pre-attentive processing systems.
Abstract: To better understand the possible functional significance of electrophysiological sensory gating measures, response suppression of midlatency auditory event related potential (ERP) components was compared to the mismatch negativity (MMN) and to self-rated indices of stimulus filtering and passive attention-switching phenomena in an agerestricted sample of healthy adults. P1 sensory gating, measured during a paired-click paradigm, was correlated with MMN amplitude, measured during an acoustic oddball paradigm (intensity deviation). Also, individuals that exhibited less robust P1 suppression endorsed higher rates of ‘‘perceptual modulation’’ difficulties, whereas component N1 suppression was more closely related to ‘‘over-inclusion’’ of irrelevant sounds into the focus of attention. These findings suggest that the ERP components investigated are not redundant, but correspond to distinctFpossibly relatedFpre-attentive processing systems. Descriptors: Auditory evoked potentials, Sensory gating, Attention, Auditory perception, Auditory stimulation

144 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results support the preliminary validity of the Geriatric Anxiety Scale for clinical and research purposes and demonstrate good internal reliability in community dwelling and in clinical samples.

143 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Three studies examined the possibility that being liked intrinsically by others--for who one is--reduces self-esteem defense, whereas being liked for what one has achieved does not, and found similar reductions in defensiveness were not found when liking was based on achievements.
Abstract: Three studies examined the possibility that being liked intrinsically by others--for who one is--reduces self-esteem defense, whereas being liked for what one has achieved does not. All 3 studies contrasted the effects on self-esteem defense of liking based on intrinsic or achievement-related aspects of self. Study 1 showed that thoughts of being liked intrinsically reduced defensive bias toward downward social comparison. Study 2 demonstrated that being liked for intrinsic aspects of self reduced participants' tendency to defensively distance themselves from a negatively portrayed other. Study 3 revealed that being liked for intrinsic aspects of self encouraged a preference for upward over downward counterfactuals for a negative event. In all 3 studies, similar reductions in defensiveness were not found when liking was based on achievements. Discussion focuses on implications for understanding the functional value of different bases of self-worth.

143 citations


Authors

Showing all 6706 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jeff Greenberg10554243600
James F. Scott9971458515
Martin Wikelski8942025821
Neil W. Kowall8927934943
Ananth Dodabalapur8539427246
Tom Pyszczynski8224630590
Patrick S. Kamath7846631281
Connie M. Weaver7747330985
Alejandro Lucia7568023967
Michael J. McKenna7035616227
Timothy J. Craig6945818340
Sheldon Solomon6715023916
Michael H. Stone6537016355
Christopher J. Gostout6533413593
Edward T. Ryan6030311822
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

93% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

90% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

90% related

Florida State University
65.3K papers, 2.5M citations

90% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202325
202246
2021569
2020543
2019479
2018454