scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Nottingham

EducationNottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
About: University of Nottingham is a education organization based out in Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 54772 authors who have published 119600 publications receiving 4227408 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of Nottingham & University College, Nottingham.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2003-Ecology
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the relationship between climate and biodiversity and conclude that the interaction between water and energy, either directly or indirectly, provides a strong explanation for globally extensive plant and animal diversity gradients, but for animals there also is a latitudinal shift in the relative importance of ambient energy vs. water moving from the poles to the equator.
Abstract: It is often claimed that we do not understand the forces driving the global diversity gradient. However, an extensive literature suggests that contemporary climate constrains terrestrial taxonomic richness over broad geographic extents. Here, we review the empirical literature to examine the nature and form of the relationship between climate and richness. Our goals were to document the support for the climatically based energy hypothesis, and within the constraints imposed by correlative analyses, to evaluate two versions of the hypothesis: the productivity and ambient energy hypotheses. Focusing on studies extending over 800 km, we found that measures of energy, water, or water-energy balance explain spatial variation in richness better than other climatic and non-climatic variables in 82 of 85 cases. Even when considered individually and in isolation, water/ energy variables explain on average over 60% of the variation in the richness of a wide range of plant and animal groups. Further, water variables usually represent the strongest predictors in the tropics, subtropics, and warm temperate zones, whereas energy variables (for animals) or water-energy variables (for plants) dominate in high latitudes. We conclude that the interaction between water and energy, either directly or indirectly (via plant productivity), provides a strong explanation for globally extensive plant and animal diversity gradients, but for animals there also is a latitudinal shift in the relative importance of ambient energy vs. water moving from the poles to the equator. Although contemporary climate is not the only factor influencing species richness and may not explain the diversity pattern for all taxonomic groups, it is clear that understanding water-energy dynamics is critical to future biodiversity research. Analyses that do not include water-energy variables are missing a key component for explaining broad-scale patterns of diversity.

2,069 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Fifth Edition of the 'Guide to Receptors and Channels' is a compilation of the major pharmacological targets divided into seven sections: G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channel, catalytic receptors, nuclear receptors, transporters and enzymes.
Abstract: The Fifth Edition of the 'Guide to Receptors and Channels' is a compilation of the major pharmacological targets divided into seven sections: G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside suggestions for further reading. Available alongside this publication is a portal at http://www.GuideToPharmacology.org which is produced in close association with NC-IUPHAR and allows free online access to the information presented in the Fifth Edition.

2,066 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anton M. Koekemoer1, Sandra M. Faber2, Henry C. Ferguson1, Norman A. Grogin1, Dale D. Kocevski2, David C. Koo2, Kamson Lai2, Jennifer M. Lotz1, Ray A. Lucas1, Elizabeth J. McGrath2, Sara Ogaz1, Abhijith Rajan1, Adam G. Riess3, S. Rodney3, L. G. Strolger4, Stefano Casertano1, Marco Castellano, Tomas Dahlen1, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch3, Adriano Fontana, Mauro Giavalisco5, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo5, Nimish P. Hathi6, Kuang-Han Huang1, Kuang-Han Huang3, Arjen van der Wel7, Hao Jing Yan8, Viviana Acquaviva9, David M. Alexander10, Omar Almaini11, Matthew L. N. Ashby12, Marco Barden13, Eric F. Bell14, Frédéric Bournaud15, Thomas M. Brown1, Karina Caputi16, Paolo Cassata5, Peter Challis17, Ranga-Ram Chary18, Edmond Cheung2, Michele Cirasuolo16, Christopher J. Conselice11, Asantha Cooray19, Darren J. Croton20, Emanuele Daddi15, Romeel Davé21, Duilia F. de Mello22, Loic de Ravel16, Avishai Dekel23, Jennifer L. Donley1, James Dunlop16, Aaron A. Dutton24, David Elbaz25, Giovanni Fazio12, Alexei V. Filippenko26, Steven L. Finkelstein27, Chris Frazer19, Jonathan P. Gardner22, Peter M. Garnavich28, Eric Gawiser9, Ruth Gruetzbauch11, Will G. Hartley11, B. Haussler11, Jessica Herrington14, Philip F. Hopkins26, J.-S. Huang29, Saurabh Jha9, Andrew Johnson2, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe3, Ali Ahmad Khostovan19, Robert P. Kirshner12, Caterina Lani11, Kyoung-Soo Lee30, Weidong Li26, Piero Madau2, Patrick J. McCarthy6, Daniel H. McIntosh31, Ross J. McLure, Conor McPartland2, Bahram Mobasher32, Heidi Moreira9, Alice Mortlock11, Leonidas A. Moustakas18, Mark Mozena2, Kirpal Nandra33, Jeffrey A. Newman34, Jennifer L. Nielsen31, Sami Niemi1, Kai G. Noeske1, Casey Papovich27, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope, Joel R. Primack2, Swara Ravindranath35, Naveen A. Reddy, Alvio Renzini, Hans Walter Rix7, Aday R. Robaina, David J. Rosario2, Piero Rosati7, S. Salimbeni5, Claudia Scarlata18, Brian Siana18, Luc Simard36, Joseph Smidt19, D. Snyder2, Rachel S. Somerville1, Hyron Spinrad26, Amber N. Straughn22, Olivia Telford34, Harry I. Teplitz18, Jonathan R. Trump2, Carlos J. Vargas9, Carolin Villforth1, C. Wagner31, P. Wandro2, Risa H. Wechsler37, Benjamin J. Weiner21, Tommy Wiklind1, Vivienne Wild, Grant W. Wilson5, Stijn Wuyts12, Min S. Yun5 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the Hubble Space Telescope imaging data products and data reduction procedures for the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS).
Abstract: This paper describes the Hubble Space Telescope imaging data products and data reduction procedures for the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS). This survey is designed to document the evolution of galaxies and black holes at z 1.5-8, and to study Type Ia supernovae at z > 1.5. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive multi-wavelength observations. The primary CANDELS data consist of imaging obtained in the Wide Field Camera 3 infrared channel (WFC3/IR) and the WFC3 ultraviolet/optical channel, along with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). The CANDELS/Deep survey covers ~125 arcmin2 within GOODS-N and GOODS-S, while the remainder consists of the CANDELS/Wide survey, achieving a total of ~800 arcmin2 across GOODS and three additional fields (Extended Groth Strip, COSMOS, and Ultra-Deep Survey). We summarize the observational aspects of the survey as motivated by the scientific goals and present a detailed description of the data reduction procedures and products from the survey. Our data reduction methods utilize the most up-to-date calibration files and image combination procedures. We have paid special attention to correcting a range of instrumental effects, including charge transfer efficiency degradation for ACS, removal of electronic bias-striping present in ACS data after Servicing Mission 4, and persistence effects and other artifacts in WFC3/IR. For each field, we release mosaics for individual epochs and eventual mosaics containing data from all epochs combined, to facilitate photometric variability studies and the deepest possible photometry. A more detailed overview of the science goals and observational design of the survey are presented in a companion paper.

2,011 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The parmbsc0 force field as mentioned in this paper is a refinement of the AMBER parm99 force field, where emphasis has been made on the correct representation of the a/g concerted rotation in nucleic acids (NAs).

1,982 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a power-spectrum analysis of the final 2DF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) employing a direct Fourier method is presented, and the covariance matrix is determined using two different approaches to the construction of mock surveys, which are used to demonstrate that the input cosmological model can be correctly recovered.
Abstract: We present a power-spectrum analysis of the final 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS), employing a direct Fourier method. The sample used comprises 221 414 galaxies with measured redshifts. We investigate in detail the modelling of the sample selection, improving on previous treatments in a number of respects. A new angular mask is derived, based on revisions to the photometric calibration. The redshift selection function is determined by dividing the survey according to rest-frame colour, and deducing a self-consistent treatment of k-corrections and evolution for each population. The covariance matrix for the power-spectrum estimates is determined using two different approaches to the construction of mock surveys, which are used to demonstrate that the input cosmological model can be correctly recovered. We discuss in detail the possible differences between the galaxy and mass power spectra, and treat these using simulations, analytic models and a hybrid empirical approach. Based on these investigations, we are confident that the 2dFGRS power spectrum can be used to infer the matter content of the universe. On large scales, our estimated power spectrum shows evidence for the ‘baryon oscillations’ that are predicted in cold dark matter (CDM) models. Fitting to a CDM model, assuming a primordial n s = 1 spectrum, h = 0.72 and negligible neutrino mass, the preferred

1,940 citations


Authors

Showing all 55289 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Robert Langer2812324326306
Robert M. Califf1961561167961
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Simon D. M. White189795231645
Douglas F. Easton165844113809
Elliott M. Antman161716179462
Pete Smith1562464138819
Christopher P. Cannon1511118108906
Scott T. Weiss147102574742
Frede Blaabjerg1472161112017
Martin J. Blaser147820104104
Stephen Sanders1451385105943
Stuart J. Pocock145684143547
Peter B. Jones145185794641
Alexander Belyaev1421895100796
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

98% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

96% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

95% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

95% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023214
2022877
20216,553
20206,421
20195,669
20185,273