scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: A cross-national comparison

TLDR
In this paper, the authors explored patterns of correlation between the ecological footprint and ecosystem and biodiversity measures, including threatened species numbers, and found that human economic activity and environmental pressures are related to threats to biodiversity.
About
This article is published in Ecological Indicators.The article was published on 2012-05-01. It has received 53 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Biocapacity & Ecological health.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon, Land, and Water Footprint Accounts for the European Union: Consumption, Production, and Displacements through International Trade

TL;DR: Overall, the EU displaced all three types of environmental pressures to the rest of the world, through imports of products with embodied pressures, while the UK was the most important displacer overall and the largest net exporters of embodied environmental pressures were Poland, France, and Spain.
Journal ArticleDOI

What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries.

TL;DR: For the SSA countries, the upgrading of industrial structure and further improvement of renewable energy are needed and urbanization plays a crucial role in contributing to environmental degradation and requires immediate policy response.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of real income, financial development and trade openness on the ecological footprint (EF) of consumption using a panel data of leading world EF contributors during the period 1991-2012 were examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

Lawrence N. Hudson, +273 more
TL;DR: A new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local-scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world is described and assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries

TL;DR: The literature mostly uses a single indicator as a measure for environmental degradation as mentioned in this paper, but each single indicator captures only a part of the environmental problem, an indicator that is not representative of the whole environmental problem.
References
More filters
Book

Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists

TL;DR: An essential textbook for any student or researcher in biology needing to design experiments, sample programs or analyse the resulting data is as discussed by the authors, covering both classical and Bayesian philosophies, before advancing to the analysis of linear and generalized linear models Topics covered include linear and logistic regression, simple and complex ANOVA models (for factorial, nested, block, split-plot and repeated measures and covariance designs), and log-linear models Multivariate techniques, including classification and ordination, are then introduced.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fishing Down Marine Food Webs

TL;DR: The mean trophic level of the species groups reported in Food and Agricultural Organization global fisheries statistics declined from 1950 to 1994, and results indicate that present exploitation patterns are unsustainable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines

Stuart H. M. Butchart, +46 more
- 28 May 2010 - 
TL;DR: Most indicators of the state of biodiversity showed declines, with no significant recent reductions in rate, whereas indicators of pressures on biodiversity showed increases, indicating that the Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2010 targets have not been met.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild

Abstract: I Genesis, God blesses human beings and bids us to take dominion over the fish in the sea, the birds in the air, and every other living thing. We are entreated to be fruitful and multiply, to fill the earth, and subdue it (Gen. 1:28). The bad news, and the good news, is that we have almost succeeded. There is little debate in scientific circles about the importance of human influence on ecosystems. According to scientists’ reports, we appropriate over 40% of the net primary productivity (the green material) produced on Earth each year (Vitousek et al. 1986, Rojstaczer et al. 2001). We consume 35% of the productivity of the oceanic shelf (Pauly and Christensen 1995), and we use 60% of freshwater run-off (Postel et al. 1996). The unprecedented escalation in both human population and consumption in the 20th century has resulted in environmental crises never before encountered in the history of humankind and the world (McNeill 2000). E. O. Wilson (2002) claims it would now take four Earths to meet the consumption demands of the current human population, if every human consumed at the level of the average US inhabitant. The influence of human beings on the planet has become so pervasive that it is hard to find adults in any country who have not seen the environment around them reduced in natural values during their lifetimes—woodlots converted to agriculture, agricultural lands converted to suburban development, suburban development converted to urban areas. The cumulative effect of these many local changes is the global phenomenon of human influence on nature, a new geological epoch some call the “anthropocene” (Steffen and Tyson 2001). Human influence is arguably the most important factor affecting life of all kinds in today’s world (Lande 1998, Terborgh 1999, Pimm 2001, UNEP 2001). Yet despite the broad consensus among biologists about the importance of human influence on nature, this phenomenon and its implications are not fully appreciated by the larger human community, which does not recognize them in its economic systems (Hall et al. 2001) or in most of its political decisions (Soulé and Terborgh 1999, Chapin et al. 2000). In part, this lack of appreciation may be due to scientists’ propensity to express themselves in terms like “appropriation of net primary productivity” or “exponential population growth,” abstractions that require some training to understand. It may be due to historical assumptions about and habits inherited from times when human beings, as a group, had dramatically less influence on the biosphere. Now the individual deci-
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (2)
How do you have a good ecological footprint?

This analysis provides evidence that the Ecological Footprint is a meaningful ecological indicator which can be compared to equivalent measures of the appropriation of ecosystem productive capacity and land use pressures.

In what year did Earth's ecological footprint begin to exceed Earth's biocapacity?

We found that the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity are closely related especially to the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP).