scispace - formally typeset
H

Hollie Booth

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  40
Citations -  1333

Hollie Booth is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fishing & Biology. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 31 publications receiving 866 citations. Previous affiliations of Hollie Booth include Wildlife Conservation Society & Frankfurt Zoological Society.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity

TL;DR: Using pan-tropical data on bird occurrence and abundance across a human land-use intensity gradient, a likelihood-based approach allowed us to quantify uncertainty in modelled responses, essential for applying the model to project future change.
Journal ArticleDOI

The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

Lawrence N. Hudson, +273 more
TL;DR: A new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local-scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world is described and assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

Lawrence N. Hudson, +573 more
TL;DR: The PREDICTS project as discussed by the authors provides a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use.
Journal ArticleDOI

The neglected complexities of shark fisheries, and priorities for holistic risk-based management

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a framework for assessing feasibility in a shark management context, which could be integrated with traditional fisheries risk assessments in order to bridge the gap and highlight critical gaps relating to incorporating socioeconomic factors in research and management.