scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The insoluble problems of books: What does Altmetric.com have to offer?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX.,The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions, platform offers for books. The authors use two distinct data sets of books. On the one hand, the authors analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other hand, the authors use Clarivate’s Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com’s capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, the authors compare the findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX.,Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries, such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, the authors find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools.,This study targets different audience which can benefit from the findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool.,This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com’s functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.

TL;DR: An overview of science from the Wikipedia perspective is provided, finding a significative presence of “Medicine” and “Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology” papers and that the most important journals are multidisciplinary in nature, suggesting also that high-impact factor journals were more likely to be cited.
Journal ArticleDOI

Blogs and News Sources Coverage in Altmetrics Data Providers: A Comparative Analysis by Country, Language, and Subject

TL;DR: Altmetric.com is the most geographically and linguistically heterogeneous service, with the best coverage of blogs; PlumX collects more news media, especially local-interest newspapers from the United States; and Crossref Event Data is the platform that brings together most English-speaking sources.
Journal ArticleDOI

Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication

TL;DR: In this article, a review of the use of altmetric data providers is presented, supported by a meta-analysis of the coverage and metric counts obtained by more than 100 publications that have used these bibliographic platforms for alt-metric studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative analysis of book citations in social science journals by Central and Eastern European authors

TL;DR: The role of authored and edited books in scholarly communication through citation analysis is assessed, and the core book authors were identified across scientific fields, and differences in citing books covered by Scholarly Publishers Indicators versus books published by local/regional publishers were explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Open Access Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: an Open Access Altmetric Advantage.

TL;DR: Although sampling issues prevent the strong conclusion that OA facilitates extra attention at whole book level, the apparent OA altmetrics advantage suggests that the move towards OA is increasing social sharing and broader impact.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Novel genetic associations for blood pressure identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across multiple ancestries

Mary F. Feitosa, +299 more
- 18 Jun 2018 - 
TL;DR: In insights into the role of alcohol consumption in the genetic architecture of hypertension, a large two-stage investigation incorporating joint testing of main genetic effects and single nucleotide variant (SNV)-alcohol consumption interactions is conducted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review

TL;DR: This paper addresses research performance monitoring of the social sciences and the humanities using citation analysis using a broader range of both publications and citation indicators and three options for bibliometric monitoring are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations

TL;DR: This is the first review to identify the 81 outcome measures the research community uses for disease-modifying trials in mild-to-moderate dementia, and recommended core outcomes were cognition as the fundamental deficit in dementia and to indicate disease modification, serial structural MRIs.
Journal ArticleDOI

How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of `alternative metrics' in scientific publications

TL;DR: The main result of the study is that the altmetrics source that provides the most metrics is Mendeley, with metrics on readerships for 62.6 % of all the publications studied, other sources only provide marginal information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature

TL;DR: This review provides an extensive account of the state of the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use.
Related Papers (5)