scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

American Cancer Society

NonprofitAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: American Cancer Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 1339 authors who have published 3700 publications receiving 688166 citations. The organization is also known as: American Cancer Society, ACS & American Society for the Control of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article summarizes cancer mortality trends and disparities based on data from the National Center for Health Statistics and sets the stage for a national cancer control plan, or blueprint, for the American Cancer Society goals for reducing cancer mortality by the year 2035.
Abstract: This article summarizes cancer mortality trends and disparities based on data from the National Center for Health Statistics It is the first in a series of articles that will describe the American Cancer Society's vision for how cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment can be transformed to lower the cancer burden in the United States, and sets the stage for a national cancer control plan, or blueprint, for the American Cancer Society goals for reducing cancer mortality by the year 2035 Although steady progress in reducing cancer mortality has been made over the past few decades, it is clear that much more could, and should, be done to save lives through the comprehensive application of currently available evidence-based public health and clinical interventions to all segments of the population CA Cancer J Clin 2018;000:000-000 © 2018 American Cancer Society

136 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preliminary results indicate that calcium and vitamin D3 may decrease oxidative DNA damage in the normal human colorectal mucosa, and support the hypothesis that 8-OH-dG labeling in colOREctal crypts is a treatable oxidative DNADamage biomarker of risk for coloreCTal neoplasms, and provide support for further investigation of calcium anditamin D3 as chemopreventive agents against colorectorial neoplasm.
Abstract: The exact antineoplastic effects of calcium and vitamin D(3) in the human colon are unclear. Animal and in vitro studies show that these two agents reduce oxidative stress; however, these findings have never been investigated in humans. To address this, we conducted a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial clinical trial to test the effects of calcium and vitamin D(3) on a marker of oxidative DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), in the normal colorectal mucosa. Patients (N = 92) with at least one pathology-confirmed colorectal adenoma were treated with 2 g/d calcium and/or 800 IU/d vitamin D(3) versus placebo over 6 months. Overall labeling and colorectal crypt distribution of 8-OH-dG in biopsies of normal-appearing rectal mucosa were detected by standardized automated immunohistochemistry and quantified by image analysis. After 6 months of treatment, 8-OH-dG labeling along the full lengths of colorectal crypts decreased by 22% (P = 0.15) and 25% (P = 0.10) in the calcium and vitamin D(3) groups, respectively, but not in the calcium plus vitamin D(3) group. The estimated treatment effects were strongest among participants with higher baseline colon crypt vitamin D receptor expression (P = 0.05). Overall, these preliminary results indicate that calcium and vitamin D(3) may decrease oxidative DNA damage in the normal human colorectal mucosa, support the hypothesis that 8-OH-dG labeling in colorectal crypts is a treatable oxidative DNA damage biomarker of risk for colorectal neoplasms, and provide support for further investigation of calcium and vitamin D(3) as chemopreventive agents against colorectal neoplasms.

136 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jonine D. Figueroa1, Yuanqing Ye2, Afshan Siddiq3, Afshan Siddiq4, Montserrat Garcia-Closas1, Montserrat Garcia-Closas4, Nilanjan Chatterjee1, Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson1, Victoria K. Cortessis5, Charles Kooperberg6, Olivier Cussenot, Simone Benhamou7, Simone Benhamou8, Jennifer Prescott9, Stefano Porru10, Colin P.N. Dinney, Núria Malats11, Dalsu Baris1, Mark P. Purdue1, Eric J. Jacobs12, Demetrius Albanes1, Zhaoming Wang13, Xiang Deng13, Charles C. Chung13, Wei Tang1, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita14, Dimitrios Trichopoulos9, Dimitrios Trichopoulos15, Börje Ljungberg16, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Elisabete Weiderpass, Vittorio Krogh, Miren Dorronsoro, Ruth C. Travis17, Anne Tjønneland, Paul Brenan18, Jenny Chang-Claude19, Elio Riboli3, Elio Riboli4, David V. Conti5, Manuela Gago-Dominguez20, Mariana C. Stern5, Malcolm C. Pike21, David Van Den Berg5, Jian-Min Yuan22, Chancellor Hohensee5, Rebecca Rodabough5, G. Cancel-Tassin6, G. Cancel-Tassin23, M. Rouprêt6, M. Rouprêt23, Eva Compérat23, Eva Compérat6, Constance Chen9, Immaculata De Vivo9, Edward Giovannucci9, David J. Hunter24, David J. Hunter9, Peter Kraft9, Sara Lindström9, Angela Carta9, Sofia Pavanello25, Cecilia Arici9, Giuseppe Mastrangelo25, Ashish M. Kamat, Seth P. Lerner26, H. Barton Grossman9, Jie Lin2, Jian Gu2, Xia Pu2, Amy Hutchinson12, Laurie Burdette12, William Wheeler, Manolis Kogevinas, Adonina Tardón27, Consol Serra28, Alfredo Carrato, Reina García-Closas29, Josep Lloreta, Molly Schwenn, Margaret R. Karagas30, Alison Johnson, Alan R. Schned30, Karla R. Armenti31, G. M. Hosain31, Gerald L. Andriole32, Robert L. Grubb32, Amanda Black1, W. Ryan Diver12, Susan M. Gapstur12, Stephanie J. Weinstein1, Jarmo Virtamo33, Christopher A. Haiman5, Maria Teresa Landi1, Neil E. Caporaso1, Joseph F. Fraumeni1, Paolo Vineis3, Paolo Vineis4, Xifeng Wu2, Debra T. Silverman1, Stephen J. Chanock1, Nathaniel Rothman1 
TL;DR: This study has identified new susceptibility alleles for bladder cancer risk that require fine-mapping and laboratory investigation, which could further understanding into the biological underpinnings of bladder carcinogenesis.
Abstract: andidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 11 independent susceptibility loci associated with bladder cancer risk. To discover additional risk variants, we conducted a ...

135 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Feb 2019-Cancer
TL;DR: Women and their health care providers need a reliable answer to this important question: If a woman chooses to participate in regular mammography screening, then how much will this choice improve her chances of avoiding a death from breast cancer compared with women who choose not to participate.
Abstract: Background Women and their health care providers need a reliable answer to this important question: If a woman chooses to participate in regular mammography screening, then how much will this choice improve her chances of avoiding a death from breast cancer compared with women who choose not to participate? Methods To answer this question, we used comprehensive registries for population, screening history, breast cancer incidence, and disease-specific death data in a defined population in Dalarna County, Sweden. The annual incidence of breast cancer was calculated along with the annual incidence of breast cancers that were fatal within 10 and within 11 to 20 years of diagnosis among women aged 40 to 69 years who either did or did not participate in mammography screening during a 39-year period (1977-2015). For an additional comparison, corresponding data are presented from 19 years of the prescreening period (1958-1976). All patients received stage-specific therapy according to the latest national guidelines, irrespective of the mode of detection. Results The benefit for women who chose to participate in an organized breast cancer screening program was a 60% lower risk of dying from breast cancer within 10 years after diagnosis (relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.48) and a 47% lower risk of dying from breast cancer within 20 years after diagnosis (relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.63) compared with the corresponding risks for nonparticipants. Conclusions Although all patients with breast cancer stand to benefit from advances in breast cancer therapy, the current results demonstrate that women who have participated in mammography screening obtain a significantly greater benefit from the therapy available at the time of diagnosis than do those who have not participated.

135 citations


Authors

Showing all 1345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jeffrey A. Bluestone14351577080
Richard D. Smith140118079758
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Brian E. Henderson13771269921
Ahmedin Jemal132500380474
Michael J. Thun12939279051
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

86% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
20228
2021202
2020239
2019222
2018194