scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

American Cancer Society

NonprofitAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: American Cancer Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 1339 authors who have published 3700 publications receiving 688166 citations. The organization is also known as: American Cancer Society, ACS & American Society for the Control of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
25 Dec 1991-JAMA
TL;DR: It is suggested that there is a group of urban hospitals, generally small and marginally reimbursed, where comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are not obtained.
Abstract: Objective. —To determine the degree of compliance with clinical standards among hospitals for care of breast cancer patients and account for variations in compliance. Design. —Analysis of cancer registry data submitted to the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, Chicago, for a concurrent prospective descriptive study of breast cancer, supplemented by other hospital data from public sources. Setting. —Ninety-nine Illinois hospitals evenly distributed among rural counties, counties with small cities outside the Chicago metropolitan area, exurban counties in the Chicago metropolitan area, suburban Cook County, and urban Chicago. Patients. —A total of 5766 newly diagnosed patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer in 1988, representing 84% of the estimated 6900 new cases in the state for that year. Main Outcome Measures. —Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses of five dependent quality variables from clinical indicators related to early diagnosis, hormone receptor determination, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy, and axillary lymph node dissection. Results. —At the hospitals studied, (1) late stage (IIb through IV) at diagnosis was associated with urban location, higher proportion of poorly insured patients, fewer breast cancer cases treated, and lower oncology charges (proportion of variance explained, R 2 =.50, P R 2 =.18, P R 2 =.21, P Conclusions. —The findings suggest that there is a group of urban hospitals, generally small and marginally reimbursed, where comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are not obtained. ( JAMA . 1991;266:3429-3432)

114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Dyspnea is a common symptom of lung cancer that can impact patient physical, social, and psychological well-being and there was a trend towards older patients reporting more severe dyspnea than younger patients, and no significant association was found between Dyspnea, anxiety, and private body consciousness.

113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the literature regarding the medical use of marijuana and these cannabinoid pharmaceuticals (with emphasis on indications relevant to oncology), as well as available information regarding adverse effects of marijuana use is presented in this article.
Abstract: Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Marijuana has been used for centuries, and interest in its medicinal properties has been increasing in recent years. Investigations into these medicinal properties has led to the development of cannabinoid pharmaceuticals such as dronabinol, nabilone, and nabiximols. Dronabinol is best studied in the treatment of nausea secondary to cancer chemotherapy and anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for those indications. Nabilone has been best studied for the treatment of nausea secondary to cancer chemotherapy. There are also limited studies of these drugs for other conditions. Nabiximols is only available in the United States through clinical trials, but is used in Canada and the United Kingdom for the treatment of spasticity secondary to multiple sclerosis and pain. Studies of marijuana have concentrated on nausea, appetite, and pain. This article will review the literature regarding the medical use of marijuana and these cannabinoid pharmaceuticals (with emphasis on indications relevant to oncology), as well as available information regarding adverse effects of marijuana use.

113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mia M. Gaudet1, Karoline Kuchenbaecker2, Joseph Vijai3, Robert J. Klein3, Tomas Kirchhoff4, Lesley McGuffog2, Daniel Barrowdale2, Alison M. Dunning2, Andy C. H. Lee2, Joe Dennis2, Sue Healey5, Ed Dicks2, Penny Soucy6, Olga M. Sinilnikova7, Vernon S. Pankratz8, Xianshu Wang8, Ronald C. Eldridge9, Daniel C. Tessier10, Daniel Vincent10, Francois Bacot10, Frans B. L. Hogervorst11, Susan Peock2, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet12, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet13, kConFab Investigators14, Paolo Peterlongo, Rita K. Schmutzler, Katherine L. Nathanson15, Marion Piedmonte16, Christian F. Singer17, Mads Thomassen18, Thomas Hansen19, Susan L. Neuhausen20, Ignacio Blanco, Mark H. Greene21, Judith Garber22, Jeffrey N. Weitzel23, Irene L. Andrulis24, Irene L. Andrulis25, David E. Goldgar26, Emma D'Andrea27, Trinidad Caldés28, Heli Nevanlinna29, Ana Osorio, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg30, Adalgeir Arason31, Gad Rennert32, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland33, Annemarie H. van der Hout34, Carolien M. Kets35, Cora M. Aalfs, Juul T. Wijnen36, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems37, Hebon11, Embrace2, Debra Frost2, Steve Ellis2, Elena Fineberg2, Radka Platte2, D. Gareth Evans2, Chris Jacobs38, Julian Adlard, Marc Tischkowitz2, Mary Porteous39, Francesca Damiola7, Lisa Golmard12, Laure Barjhoux7, Michel Longy40, Muriel Belotti12, Sandra Fert Ferrer, Sylvie Mazoyer7, Amanda B. Spurdle5, Siranoush Manoukian, Monica Barile, Maurizio Genuardi41, Norbert Arnold42, Alfons Meindl43, Christian Sutter44, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Susan M. Domchek15, Georg Pfeiler17, Eitan Friedman45, Uffe Birk Jensen46, Mark E. Robson3, Sohela Shah3, Conxi Lázaro, Phuong L. Mai21, Javier Benitez, Melissa C. Southey47, Marjanka K. Schmidt11, Peter A. Fasching48, Julian Peto49, Manjeet K. Humphreys2, Qin Wang2, Kyriaki Michailidou2, Elinor J. Sawyer38, Barbara Burwinkel50, Barbara Burwinkel44, Pascal Guénel51, Pascal Guénel52, Stig E. Bojesen19, Roger L. Milne, Hermann Brenner50, Magdalena Lochmann43, Kristiina Aittomäki29, Thilo Dörk53, Sara Margolin54, Arto Mannermaa55, Diether Lambrechts56, Jenny Chang-Claude50, Paolo Radice, Graham G. Giles57, Graham G. Giles47, Christopher A. Haiman58, Robert Winqvist59, Peter Devillee36, Montserrat Garcia-Closas60, Montserrat Garcia-Closas61, Nils Schoof54, Maartje J. Hooning33, Angela Cox62, Paul D.P. Pharoah2, Anna Jakubowska63, Nick Orr60, Anna González-Neira, Guillermo Pita, M. Rosario Alonso, Per Hall60, Fergus J. Couch8, Jacques Simard6, David Altshuler64, David Altshuler65, Douglas F. Easton2, Georgia Chenevix-Trench5, Antonis C. Antoniou2, Kenneth Offit3 
American Cancer Society1, University of Cambridge2, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center3, New York University4, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute5, Laval University6, University of Lyon7, Mayo Clinic8, Emory University9, McGill University10, Netherlands Cancer Institute11, Curie Institute12, Paris Descartes University13, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre14, University of Pennsylvania15, Roswell Park Cancer Institute16, Medical University of Vienna17, Odense University Hospital18, Copenhagen University Hospital19, Beckman Research Institute20, National Institutes of Health21, Dana Corporation22, City of Hope National Medical Center23, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto24, University of Toronto25, University of Utah26, University of Padua27, Hospital Clínico San Carlos28, Helsinki University Central Hospital29, University of Pretoria30, University of Iceland31, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine32, Erasmus University Medical Center33, University Medical Center Groningen34, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre35, Leiden University Medical Center36, Utrecht University37, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust38, Western General Hospital39, University of Bordeaux40, University of Florence41, University of Kiel42, Technische Universität München43, Heidelberg University44, Sheba Medical Center45, Aarhus University Hospital46, University of Melbourne47, University of California, Los Angeles48, University of London49, German Cancer Research Center50, University of Paris-Sud51, French Institute of Health and Medical Research52, Hannover Medical School53, Karolinska Institutet54, University of Eastern Finland55, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven56, Cancer Council Victoria57, University of Southern California58, Oulu University Hospital59, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation60, Institute of Cancer Research61, University of Sheffield62, Pomeranian Medical University63, Harvard University64, Broad Institute65
TL;DR: A comprehensive update of novel and previously reported breast cancer susceptibility loci contributes to the establishment of a panel of SNPs that modify breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers and may have clinical utility for women with BRCa2 mutations weighing options for medical prevention of breast cancer.
Abstract: Common genetic variants contribute to the observed variation in breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers; those known to date have all been found through population-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To comprehensively identify breast cancer risk modifying loci for BRCA2 mutation carriers, we conducted a deep replication of an ongoing GWAS discovery study. Using the ranked P-values of the breast cancer associations with the imputed genotype of 1.4 M SNPs, 19,029 SNPs were selected and designed for inclusion on a custom Illumina array that included a total of 211,155 SNPs as part of a multi-consortial project. DNA samples from 3,881 breast cancer affected and 4,330 unaffected BRCA2 mutation carriers from 47 studies belonging to the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 were genotyped and available for analysis. We replicated previously reported breast cancer susceptibility alleles in these BRCA2 mutation carriers and for several regions (including FGFR2, MAP3K1, CDKN2A/B, and PTHLH) identified SNPs that have stronger evidence of association than those previously published. We also identified a novel susceptibility allele at 6p24 that was inversely associated with risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (rs9348512; per allele HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.90, P = 3.9 x 10(-8)). This SNP was not associated with breast cancer risk either in the general population or in BRCA1 mutation carriers. The locus lies within a region containing TFAP2A, which encodes a transcriptional activation protein that interacts with several tumor suppressor genes. This report identifies the first breast cancer risk locus specific to a BRCA2 mutation background. This comprehensive update of novel and previously reported breast cancer susceptibility loci contributes to the establishment of a panel of SNPs that modify breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. This panel may have clinical utility for women with BRCA2 mutations weighing options for medical prevention of breast cancer.

113 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Buccal cells should be collected before brushing teeth and processed within 5 days of collection to maximize hDNA yield, and high molecular weight DNA was found in all but one sample.
Abstract: Buccal cells are becoming an important source of genomic DNA in epidemiological studies, but little is known about the effect of different sampling conditions on DNA quality and yield. We used a mouthwash protocol to collect six daily buccal cell samples from 35 healthy volunteers. Twenty-four individuals (six men and 18 women) correctly completed the protocol and were included in paired analyses to determine whether "swish" time (30 s versus 60 s), toothbrushing before collection, or lag time between collection and DNA extraction (1 day versus 5, 10, or 30 days at room temperature) would affect sample quality and yield. Total DNA, human-specific DNA (hDNA), degradation of DNA, and ability to amplify by PCR were determined. hDNA yield did not significantly vary by "swish" time. However, toothbrushing 1 h before sample collection reduced the amount of hDNA by nearly 40% (34 microg versus 21 microg; P = 0.06). Median hDNA yields for samples that were held for 1, 5, 10, and 30 days before extraction were 32 microg (range, 4-196), 32 microg (2-194), 23 microg (3-80), and 21 microg (5-56), respectively. The 10- and 30-day samples had significantly less hDNA than those processed after 1 day (P = 0.01). PCR success rates for beta-globin gene fragments of length 268 bp, 536 bp, and 989 bp were 94% or better, and high molecular weight DNA (>23 kb) was found in all but one sample. These results suggest that buccal cells should be collected before brushing teeth and processed within 5 days of collection to maximize hDNA yield.

113 citations


Authors

Showing all 1345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
Susan E. Hankinson15178988297
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jeffrey A. Bluestone14351577080
Richard D. Smith140118079758
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Brian E. Henderson13771269921
Ahmedin Jemal132500380474
Michael J. Thun12939279051
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

86% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
20228
2021202
2020239
2019222
2018194