scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Sao Paulo State University

EducationSão Paulo, Brazil
About: Sao Paulo State University is a education organization based out in São Paulo, Brazil. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 55715 authors who have published 100436 publications receiving 1375332 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results show that sonication time, PLGA and drug amounts, PVA concentration, ratio between aqueous and organic phases, and the method of solvent evaporation have a significant influence on size distribution of the nanoparticles.

446 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the evolving relationship between land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil and argue that strong enforcement of sector-oriented policies and solving long-standing land tenure problems, rather than simply waiting for market self-regulation, are key steps to buffer the detrimental effects of agricultural intensification at the forefront of a sustainable pathway for land use in Brazil.
Abstract: This Review considers the evolving relationship between land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil. Despite the intensification of agriculture over the past decade or so, deforestation has decreased, resulting in reduced greenhouse gas emissions. However, inequality in land ownership and city growth fuelled by rural–urban migration remain pressing issues for policymakers. Agriculture, deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions and local/regional climate change have been closely intertwined in Brazil. Recent studies show that this relationship has been changing since the mid 2000s, with the burgeoning intensification and commoditization of Brazilian agriculture. On one hand, this accrues considerable environmental dividends including a pronounced reduction in deforestation (which is becoming decoupled from agricultural production), resulting in a decrease of ∼40% in nationwide greenhouse gas emissions since 2005, and a potential cooling of the climate at the local scale. On the other hand, these changes in the land-use system further reinforce the long-established inequality in land ownership, contributing to rural–urban migration that ultimately fuels haphazard expansion of urban areas. We argue that strong enforcement of sector-oriented policies and solving long-standing land tenure problems, rather than simply waiting for market self-regulation, are key steps to buffer the detrimental effects of agricultural intensification at the forefront of a sustainable pathway for land use in Brazil.

446 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that campo rupestre is fully comparable to and remarkably convergent with both fynbos and kwongkan, and fulfills the criteria for a classic OCBIL.
Abstract: Botanists, ecologists and evolutionary biologists are familiar with the astonishing species richness and endemism of the fynbos of the Cape Floristic Region and the ancient and unique flora of the kwongkan of south-western Australia. These regions represent old climatically-buffered infertile landscapes (OCBILs) that are the basis of a general hypothesis to explain their richness and endemism. However, few ecologists are familiar with the campo rupestre of central and eastern Brazil, an extremely old mountaintop ecosystem that is both a museum of ancient lineages and a cradle of continuing diversification of endemic lineages. Diversification of some lineages of campo rupestre pre-dates diversification of lowland cerrado, suggesting it may be the most ancient open vegetation in eastern South America. This vegetation comprises more than 5000 plant species, nearly 15 % of Brazil’s plant diversity, in an area corresponding to 0.78 % of its surface. Reviewing empirical data, we scrutinise five predictions of the OCBIL theory, and show that campo rupestre is fully comparable to and remarkably convergent with both fynbos and kwongkan, and fulfills the criteria for a classic OCBIL. The increasing threats to campo rupestre are compromising ecosystem services and we argue for the implementation of more effective conservation and restoration strategies.

434 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2008-Copeia
TL;DR: This is an extraordinary book based on the experience of an impressive team of specialists on amphibian declines and conservation, primarily focused on species from the United States, and is divided into a collection of 52 essays on conservation written mainly by researchers with extensive experience in amphibian conservation.
Abstract: AMPHIBIAN DECLINES: THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF UNITED STATES SPECIES. Michael Lannoo (ed.). 2005. University of California Press, Berkeley. ISBN 0-520-235924. XXI + 1094 p. $95.00 (hard cover).—During the past decade and a half, much has been discussed and published on amphibian declines. The new information obtained created a novel field of research in herpetology. The starting point of this new field was the First World Congress of Herpetology, held in Canterbury, England, in 1989, when herpetologists found that the amphibian disappearances they had witnessed individually were not merely rare, local phenomena but rather appeared to be occurring around the globe. The relevance of amphibian declines can be measured not only by the scientific production but also by the extensive coverage by the popular press. The book ‘‘Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species’’ summarizes the advances of this new research field, mainly in the United States. This is an extraordinary book based on the experience of an impressive team of specialists on amphibian declines and conservation, primarily focused on species from the United States. Because North American herpetologists have accumulated detailed data on native amphibians over many years, this book is very thorough. The book is divided into two parts; part one is a collection of 52 essays on conservation written mainly by researchers with extensive experience in amphibian conservation. This first part is divided into an Introduction and chapters titled Declines, Causes, Conservation, Surveys and Monitoring, Education, and Perspective. Part two corresponds to the species accounts for Anura and Caudata. An amazing total of 215 contributors participated in the two parts of the book, producing more than a thousand pages of rich information on amphibian declines and conservation in United States. The essays vary in detail and breadth of coverage, and there is some overlap among some of them, but this is to be expected in a book written by so many scientists. In the Introduction there are five essays that provide a historical perspective on the conservation of amphibians. In the Declines chapter five essays give a historical perspective as well, but there is also specific information on the decline of cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) and a data-rich essay on the decline of the salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Together the essays address all of the relevant topics of conservation and decline in amphibians. For example, the first essay by Tim Halliday addresses the main reasons for amphibian declines, summarizing recent progress that is improving our understanding on the causal factors promoting it. He indicates habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, increased UV-B radiation, and disease as the main factors, but also calls attention to the synergistic action among some of these causes. The necessity of a more ample comprehension of the conservation status of other groups of organisms is also highlighted, given that declines may also be severe in other taxa, such as bivalves. The lack of data on distribution, population structure, and habitat of amphibians makes the task of protection more difficult. In the second essay, Martha L. Crump discusses why some species are in decline while others are not. She compares studies in different parts of the world and concludes that the patterns associated with declines in one assemblage are not necessarily repeated in other assemblages. She did not find a clear pattern of differences (in phylogeny, distribution, habitat, activity, diet, body size, skin characteristics, and life history traits) between declining and non-declining species. She concludes that some species are less able to cope with anthropogenic environmental changes. In Causes, 12 essays adequately cover the main causes that have been proposed or demonstrated to be involved in amphibian declines. Global warming, UV radiation, chemical pollution, parasites and malformations, habitat destruction or alteration, and commercial trade of amphibians are among the treated topics. However, in this chapter some essays are not related to the causes of decline per se, such as the essay on the Lucké renal adenocarcinoma in Northern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates pipiens). In this case there is no evidence that the carcinoma is a factor in frog population decline. In Conservation, 18 essays treat different aspects of amphibian conservation. There are essays on the conservation of specific taxa, such as one on the endangered Houston Toad (Anaxyrus houstonensis) that includes information on the major causes of decline and the politics that play an important role in conservation. The essay on fluctuations in the size of tiger salamander populations provides useful information for understanding the related natural and anthropogenic factors that affect this amphibian. The essay on the Texas spring and cave salamanders (Eurycea) shows that most species have restricted distributions and are threatened by human activities. The essay on the Southwestern desert bufonids indicates that, although these toads escaped the declines experienced by many anurans, some species are being eliminated from some areas as a result of habitat alteration. Two essays raise questions on taxonomic and systematic problems and the conservation status of the amphibians. They call attention to the necessity of clear and workable systems of classification to describe biodiversity, the importance of phylogenetic taxonomies, and the importance of conservation systematics in management and politics. The essay by Karen R. Lips and Maureen A. Donnelly is an exception in the book in that it aims to describe the nature, extent, and possible causes of amphibian declines in the tropics and not in United States. The limitation of this essay is the lack of data on tropical amphibian, which is not the authors’ fault (see below). Other essays in this chapter are on amphibian decline and management, landscape ecology, ecotoxicology, importance of museum collections in amphibian conservation, reserve network, population manipulations of imperiled species, exotic invading species of fish and amphibians and their impacts on the natural systems, and the importance of natural history in the conservation of amphibians. In the Surveys and Monitoring chapter, nine essays cover general and specific aspects, including methodological proposals. Some essays treat the distribution, decline, and monitoring of amphibians from specific places in the United States or from a general program, the North American

432 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a literature review, a critical analysis, and a proposal for incorporating the radiality constraints in mathematical models of optimization problems for radial distribution systems, which can be considered in a simple and efficient way.
Abstract: Distribution systems commonly operate with a radial topology, so all models of optimization problems in these distribution systems should consider radiality in their formulation. This work presents a literature review, a critical analysis, and a proposal for incorporating the radiality constraints in mathematical models of optimization problems for radial distribution systems. The objective is to show that the radiality constraints on such optimization problems can be considered in a simple and efficient way. The reconfiguration and expansion planning problems of distribution systems are used to test and verify the proposed radiality constraints. A generalization of radiality constraints is also examined.

429 citations


Authors

Showing all 56201 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Russel J. Reiter1691646121010
Tobin J. Marks1591621111604
Joseph T. Hupp14173182647
Luca Lista1402044110645
Sergio F Novaes1381559101941
Wagner Carvalho135139594184
Alberto Santoro1351576100629
Andre Sznajder134146498242
Luiz Mundim133141389792
Eduardo De Moraes Gregores133145492464
Helio Nogima132127484368
Pedro G Mercadante129133186378
D. De Jesus Damiao128116282707
Sandra S. Padula128113177174
Sudha Ahuja127101675739
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
75.6K papers, 1.2M citations

96% related

University of São Paulo
272.3K papers, 5.1M citations

96% related

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
89.4K papers, 1.4M citations

96% related

Federal University of Paraná
46.6K papers, 546.5K citations

95% related

State University of Campinas
104.6K papers, 1.8M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022765
20216,826
20206,949
20196,316
20186,314