scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

EducationMumbai, India
About: Indian Institute of Technology Bombay is a education organization based out in Mumbai, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Catalysis & Computer science. The organization has 16756 authors who have published 33588 publications receiving 570559 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An emerging area of mixed-integer optimal control that adds systems of ordinary differential equations to MINLP is described and a range of approaches for tackling this challenging class of problems are discussed, including piecewise linear approximations, generic strategies for obtaining convex relaxations for non-convex functions, spatial branch-and-bound methods, and a small sample of techniques that exploit particular types of non- Convex structures to obtain improved convex Relaxations.
Abstract: Many optimal decision problems in scientific, engineering, and public sector applications involve both discrete decisions and nonlinear system dynamics that affect the quality of the final design or plan. These decision problems lead to mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems that combine the combinatorial difficulty of optimizing over discrete variable sets with the challenges of handling nonlinear functions. We review models and applications of MINLP, and survey the state of the art in methods for solving this challenging class of problems.Most solution methods for MINLP apply some form of tree search. We distinguish two broad classes of methods: single-tree and multitree methods. We discuss these two classes of methods first in the case where the underlying problem functions are convex. Classical single-tree methods include nonlinear branch-and-bound and branch-and-cut methods, while classical multitree methods include outer approximation and Benders decomposition. The most efficient class of methods for convex MINLP are hybrid methods that combine the strengths of both classes of classical techniques.Non-convex MINLPs pose additional challenges, because they contain non-convex functions in the objective function or the constraints; hence even when the integer variables are relaxed to be continuous, the feasible region is generally non-convex, resulting in many local minima. We discuss a range of approaches for tackling this challenging class of problems, including piecewise linear approximations, generic strategies for obtaining convex relaxations for non-convex functions, spatial branch-and-bound methods, and a small sample of techniques that exploit particular types of non-convex structures to obtain improved convex relaxations.We finish our survey with a brief discussion of three important aspects of MINLP. First, we review heuristic techniques that can obtain good feasible solution in situations where the search-tree has grown too large or we require real-time solutions. Second, we describe an emerging area of mixed-integer optimal control that adds systems of ordinary differential equations to MINLP. Third, we survey the state of the art in software for MINLP.

611 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a body of knowledge that forms the beginnings of an expandable continuum framework for the description of mixing and segregation of granular materials, focusing primarily on noncohesive particles, possibly differing in size, density, shape, etc.
Abstract: ▪ Abstract Granular materials segregate. Small differences in either size or density lead to flow-induced segregation, a complex phenomenon without parallel in fluids. Modeling of mixing and segregation processes requires the confluence of several tools, including continuum and discrete descriptions (particle dynamics, Monte Carlo simulations, cellular automata computations) and, often, considerable geometrical insight. None of these viewpoints, however, is wholly satisfactory by itself. Moreover, continuum and discrete descriptions of granular flows are regime dependent, and this fact may require adopting different subviewpoints. This review organizes a body of knowledge that forms—albeit imperfectly—the beginnings of an expandable continuum framework for the description of mixing and segregation of granular materials. We focus primarily on noncohesive particles, possibly differing in size, density, shape, etc. We present segregation mechanisms and models for size and density segregation and introduce ch...

599 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Revisions of the sensitivities of the RFCs to increases in GMT and a more thorough understanding of the concept of vulnerability that has evolved over the past 8 years are described.
Abstract: Article 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [United Nations (1992) http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2009] commits signatory nations to stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that “would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference (DAI) with the climate system.” In an effort to provide some insight into impacts of climate change that might be considered DAI, authors of the Third Assessment Report (TAR) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) identified 5 “reasons for concern” (RFCs). Relationships between various impacts reflected in each RFC and increases in global mean temperature (GMT) were portrayed in what has come to be called the “burning embers diagram.” In presenting the “embers” in the TAR, IPCC authors did not assess whether any single RFC was more important than any other; nor did they conclude what level of impacts or what atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases would constitute DAI, a value judgment that would be policy prescriptive. Here, we describe revisions of the sensitivities of the RFCs to increases in GMT and a more thorough understanding of the concept of vulnerability that has evolved over the past 8 years. This is based on our expert judgment about new findings in the growing literature since the publication of the TAR in 2001, including literature that was assessed in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), as well as additional research published since AR4. Compared with results reported in the TAR, smaller increases in GMT are now estimated to lead to significant or substantial consequences in the framework of the 5 “reasons for concern.”

598 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Pietro Cortese, G. Dellacasa, Luciano Ramello, M. Sitta  +975 moreInstitutions (78)
TL;DR: The ALICE Collaboration as mentioned in this paper is a general-purpose heavy-ion experiment designed to study the physics of strongly interacting matter and the quark-gluon plasma in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the LHC.
Abstract: ALICE is a general-purpose heavy-ion experiment designed to study the physics of strongly interacting matter and the quark–gluon plasma in nucleus–nucleus collisions at the LHC. It currently involves more than 900 physicists and senior engineers, from both the nuclear and high-energy physics sectors, from over 90 institutions in about 30 countries.The ALICE detector is designed to cope with the highest particle multiplicities above those anticipated for Pb–Pb collisions (dNch/dy up to 8000) and it will be operational at the start-up of the LHC. In addition to heavy systems, the ALICE Collaboration will study collisions of lower-mass ions, which are a means of varying the energy density, and protons (both pp and pA), which primarily provide reference data for the nucleus–nucleus collisions. In addition, the pp data will allow for a number of genuine pp physics studies.The detailed design of the different detector systems has been laid down in a number of Technical Design Reports issued between mid-1998 and the end of 2004. The experiment is currently under construction and will be ready for data taking with both proton and heavy-ion beams at the start-up of the LHC.Since the comprehensive information on detector and physics performance was last published in the ALICE Technical Proposal in 1996, the detector, as well as simulation, reconstruction and analysis software have undergone significant development. The Physics Performance Report (PPR) provides an updated and comprehensive summary of the performance of the various ALICE subsystems, including updates to the Technical Design Reports, as appropriate.The PPR is divided into two volumes. Volume I, published in 2004 (CERN/LHCC 2003-049, ALICE Collaboration 2004 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 30 1517–1763), contains in four chapters a short theoretical overview and an extensive reference list concerning the physics topics of interest to ALICE, the experimental conditions at the LHC, a short summary and update of the subsystem designs, and a description of the offline framework and Monte Carlo event generators.The present volume, Volume II, contains the majority of the information relevant to the physics performance in proton–proton, proton–nucleus, and nucleus–nucleus collisions. Following an introductory overview, Chapter 5 describes the combined detector performance and the event reconstruction procedures, based on detailed simulations of the individual subsystems. Chapter 6 describes the analysis and physics reach for a representative sample of physics observables, from global event characteristics to hard processes.

587 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mansi M. Kasliwal1, Ehud Nakar2, Leo Singer3, Leo Singer4, David L. Kaplan5, David O. Cook1, A. Van Sistine5, R. M. Lau1, Christoffer Fremling1, Ore Gottlieb2, Jacob E. Jencson1, Scott M. Adams1, U. Feindt6, Kenta Hotokezaka7, Sourav Ghosh5, Daniel A. Perley8, Po-Chieh Yu9, Tsvi Piran10, James R. Allison11, James R. Allison12, G. C. Anupama13, Arvind Balasubramanian14, Keith W. Bannister15, John Bally16, Jennifer Barnes17, Sudhanshu Barway, Eric C. Bellm18, Varun Bhalerao19, Deb Sankar Bhattacharya20, Nadejda Blagorodnova1, Joshua S. Bloom21, Joshua S. Bloom22, Patrick Brady5, Chris Cannella1, Deep Chatterjee5, S. B. Cenko3, S. B. Cenko4, B. E. Cobb23, Chris M. Copperwheat8, A. Corsi24, Kaushik De1, Dougal Dobie12, Dougal Dobie15, Dougal Dobie11, S. W. K. Emery25, Phil Evans26, Ori D. Fox27, Dale A. Frail28, C. Frohmaier29, C. Frohmaier30, Ariel Goobar6, Gregg Hallinan1, Fiona A. Harrison1, George Helou1, Tanja Hinderer31, Anna Y. Q. Ho1, Assaf Horesh10, Wing-Huen Ip7, Ryosuke Itoh32, Daniel Kasen22, Hyesook Kim, N. P. M. Kuin25, Thomas Kupfer1, Christene Lynch12, Christene Lynch11, K. K. Madsen1, Paolo A. Mazzali33, Paolo A. Mazzali8, Adam A. Miller34, Adam A. Miller35, Kunal Mooley36, Tara Murphy12, Tara Murphy11, Chow-Choong Ngeow9, David A. Nichols31, Samaya Nissanke31, Peter Nugent21, Peter Nugent22, Eran O. Ofek37, H. Qi5, Robert M. Quimby38, Robert M. Quimby39, Stephan Rosswog6, Florin Rusu40, Elaine M. Sadler11, Elaine M. Sadler12, Patricia Schmidt31, Jesper Sollerman6, Iain A. Steele8, A. R. Williamson31, Y. Xu1, Lin Yan1, Yoichi Yatsu32, C. Zhang5, Weijie Zhao40 
22 Dec 2017-Science
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that merging neutron stars are a long-sought production site forging heavy elements by r-process nucleosynthesis, which is dissimilar to classical short gamma-ray bursts with ultrarelativistic jets.
Abstract: Merging neutron stars offer an excellent laboratory for simultaneously studying strong-field gravity and matter in extreme environments. We establish the physical association of an electromagnetic counterpart (EM170817) with gravitational waves (GW170817) detected from merging neutron stars. By synthesizing a panchromatic data set, we demonstrate that merging neutron stars are a long-sought production site forging heavy elements by r-process nucleosynthesis. The weak gamma rays seen in EM170817 are dissimilar to classical short gamma-ray bursts with ultrarelativistic jets. Instead, we suggest that breakout of a wide-angle, mildly relativistic cocoon engulfing the jet explains the low-luminosity gamma rays, the high-luminosity ultraviolet-optical-infrared, and the delayed radio and x-ray emission. We posit that all neutron star mergers may lead to a wide-angle cocoon breakout, sometimes accompanied by a successful jet and sometimes by a choked jet.

579 citations


Authors

Showing all 17055 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jovan Milosevic1521433106802
C. N. R. Rao133164686718
Robert R. Edelman11960549475
Claude Andre Pruneau11461045500
Sanjeev Kumar113132554386
Basanta Kumar Nandi11257243331
Shaji Kumar111126553237
Josep M. Guerrero110119760890
R. Varma10949741970
Vijay P. Singh106169955831
Vinayak P. Dravid10381743612
Swagata Mukherjee101104846234
Anil Kumar99212464825
Dhiman Chakraborty9652944459
Michael D. Ward9582336892
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Royal Institute of Technology
68.4K papers, 1.9M citations

94% related

Nanyang Technological University
112.8K papers, 3.2M citations

93% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

93% related

Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

Delft University of Technology
94.4K papers, 2.7M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023175
2022433
20213,013
20203,093
20192,760
20182,549