scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Clemson University

EducationClemson, South Carolina, United States
About: Clemson University is a education organization based out in Clemson, South Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Control theory. The organization has 20556 authors who have published 42518 publications receiving 1170779 citations. The organization is also known as: Clemson Agricultural College of South Carolina.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: 100 scientific questions that, if answered, would have the greatest impact on conservation practice and policy are identified and are expected to help identify new directions for researchers and assist funders in directing funds.
Abstract: We identified 100 scientific questions that, if answered, would have the greatest impact on conservation practice and policy. Representatives from 21 international organizations, regional sections and working groups of the Society for Conservation Biology, and 12 academics, from all continents except Antarctica, compiled 2291 questions of relevance to conservation of biological diversity worldwide. The questions were gathered from 761 individuals through workshops, email requests, and discussions. Voting by email to short-list questions, followed by a 2-day workshop, was used to derive the final list of 100 questions. Most of the final questions were derived through a process of modification and combination as the workshop progressed. The questions are divided into 12 sections: ecosystem functions and services, climate change, technological change, protected areas, ecosystem management and restoration, terrestrial ecosystems, marine ecosystems, freshwater ecosystems, species management, organizational systems and processes, societal context and change, and impacts of conservation interventions. We anticipate that these questions will help identify new directions for researchers and assist funders in directing funds.

505 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings indicate that those interventions found to influence the mediating variable of computer anxiety should be used to effectively enhance ease of use perceptions.

503 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this study a new method was developed to create 3D cellular structures: sheets of neural cells were layered on each other (layer-by-layer process) by alternate inkjet printing of NT2 cells and fibrin gels.

503 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The maternal-fetal trophic relationships in each of the major groups of fishes are systematically reviewed and Pertinent anatomical, histological, ultrastructural, developmental, physiological, and biochemical studies are considered.
Abstract: SYNOPSIS. Viviparity in the vertebrate line first makes its evolutionary appearance among fishes. It has independently evolved in a number of divergent piscine lineages. The 54 families of extant fishes that bear living young include 40 families of chondrichthyans (sharks and rays), one montypic family of coelacanths ( Latimeria ), and 13 families of teleosts. There is fossil evidence for viviparity in holocephalans and chondrosteans. Viviparity predominates among sharks and rays (40 families, 99 genera, 420 species) but is less widespread among teleosts (13 families, 122 genera, 510 species). Following an historical introduction, the organization of the female reproductive system, sites of gestation, developmental sequences and superfetation are considered. The evolution of viviparity establishes specialized maternal-fetal relationships, viz. , 1) developmental, 2) morphological, 3) trophic, 4) osmoregulatory, 5) respiratory, 6) endocrinological, and 7) immunological. While the latter four categories are briefly noted the major emphasis is on the trophic relationship and its morphological and developmental basis. First, a general overview is presented and then the maternal-fetal trophic relationships in each of the major groups of fishes are systematically reviewed. Pertinent anatomical, histological, ultrastructural, developmental, physiological, and biochemical studies are considered. Viviparous fishes are either lecithotrophic, i.e. , exclusively yolk dependent, or matrotrophic, i.e. , in receipt of a continuous supply of maternal nutrients during gestation. Nutrient transfer is accomplished by 1) oophagy and adelphophagy, 2) placental analogues, and 3) the yolk sac placenta. Placental analogues include: external epithelial absorptive surfaces, e.g. , skin, fins, gills; trophonemata, modifications of the uterine epithelia for the secretion of histotrophe or “uterine milk”; branchial placentae, close apposition between gill epithelia and either uterine or ovarian epithelial villi; the yolk sac; pericardial amnion and chorion; follicular pseudoplacenta, close apposition between follicle cells and embryonic absorptive epithelia; hypertrophied gut; and trophotaeniae, external rosette or ribbon-like projections of the embryonic gut. Among chondrichthyans, the yolk sac placenta (840–1,050%), trophonematal secretion and embryonic absorbtion of histotrophe (1,680–4,900%) and oophagy and adelphophagy (1.2 × 106%) are the most efficient methods of nutrient transfer. Among teleosts, the follicular pseudoplacenta (1,800–3,900%), trophotaeniae (8,400%) and absorption of ovarian histotrophe through surface epithelia and a hypertrophied gut (1,100–34,000%) are the most efficient. These values stand in contrast to the 30%40% loss of dry weight characteristic of oviparous fishes and viviparous lecithotrophes.

501 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results suggest that those claims which extol the environmental benefits of products and those that are designed to enhance the environmental image of an organization are most prone to be considered misleading and/or deceptive.
Abstract: As organizations seek to communicate with consumers who are concerned about the environment, advertisements containing environmental claims are becoming more prominent. While much has been written about environmental advertising, this phenomenon has seldom been examined systematically. This paper presents an empirical study which combines two classification schemes to create a matrix that identifies different types of environmental claims and the likelihood that such claims will be judged as misleading and/or deceptive. Results suggest that those claims which extol the environmental benefits of products and those that are designed to enhance the environmental image of an organization are most prone to be considered misleading and/or deceptive. Methods for improving environmental advertising are suggested.

499 citations


Authors

Showing all 20718 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yury Gogotsi171956144520
Philip S. Yu1481914107374
Aaron Dominguez1471968113224
Danny Miller13351271238
Marco Ajello13153558714
David C. Montefiori12992070049
Frank L. Lewis114104560497
Jianqing Fan10448858039
Wei Chen103143844994
Ken A. Dill9940141289
Gerald Schubert9861434505
Rod A. Wing9833347696
Feng Chen95213853881
Jimin George9433162684
François Diederich9384346906
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

97% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

96% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

96% related

Purdue University
163.5K papers, 5.7M citations

96% related

Michigan State University
137K papers, 5.6M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202363
2022253
20212,407
20202,362
20192,080
20181,978