scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Virginia

EducationCharlottesville, Virginia, United States
About: University of Virginia is a education organization based out in Charlottesville, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 52543 authors who have published 113268 publications receiving 5220506 citations. The organization is also known as: U of V & UVa.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This 25th year anniversary paper for the IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium reviews the key results in real-time scheduling theory and the historical events that led to the establishment of the current real- time computing infrastructure.
Abstract: In this 25th year anniversary paper for the IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium, we review the key results in real-time scheduling theory and the historical events that led to the establishment of the current real-time computing infrastructure. We conclude this paper by looking at the challenges ahead of us.

636 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
20 Feb 2018-Immunity
TL;DR: High‐dimensional cytometry reveals that microglia, several subsets of border‐associated macrophages and dendritic cells coexist in the CNS at steady state and exhibit disease‐specific transformations in the immune microenvironment during aging and in models of Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis.

635 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial, the American Cancer Society is issuing an initial guideline for lung cancer screening as mentioned in this paper, which recommends that clinicians with access to high-volume, high-quality screening and treatment centers should initiate a discussion about screening with apparently healthy patients aged 55 years to 74 years who have at least a 30-pack-year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
Abstract: Findings from the National Cancer Institute’s National Lung Screening Trial established that lung cancer mortality in specific high-risk groups can be reduced by annual screening with low-dose computed tomography. These findings indicate that the adoption of lung cancer screening could save many lives. Based on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial, the American Cancer Society is issuing an initial guideline for lung cancer screening. This guideline recommends that clinicians with access to high-volume, high-quality lung cancer screening and treatment centers should initiate a discussion about screening with apparently healthy patients aged 55 years to 74 years who have at least a 30–pack-year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. A process of informed and shared decision-making with a clinician related to the potential benefits, limitations, and harms associated with screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography should occur before any decision is made to initiate lung cancer screening. Smoking cessation counseling remains a high priority for clinical attention in discussions with current smokers, who should be informed of their continuing risk of lung cancer. Screening should not be viewed as an alternative to smoking cessation. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;000:000-000. V C 2013 American Cancer Society.

635 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors predict that managers' ability to optimistically bias earnings decreases with the extent to which the balance sheet overstates net assets relative to a neutral application of GAAP.
Abstract: The balance sheet accumulates the effects of previous accounting choices, so the level of net assets partly reflects the extent of previous earnings management. We predict that managers' ability to optimistically bias earnings decreases with the extent to which the balance sheet overstates net assets relative to a neutral application of GAAP. To test this prediction, we examine the likelihood of reporting various earnings surprises for 3,649 firms during 1993–1999. Consistent with our prediction, we find that the likelihood of reporting larger positive or smaller negative earnings surprises decreases with our proxy for overstated net asset values.

634 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: SAMBLASTER as mentioned in this paper is a post-passing tool that can reduce the number of read, write, sort and compress large BAM files multiple times by marking duplicates in read-sorted SAM files.
Abstract: Motivation: Illumina DNA sequencing is now the predominant source of raw genomic data, and data volumes are growing rapidly. Bioinformatic analysis pipelines are having trouble keeping pace. A common bottleneck in such pipelines is the requirement to read, write, sort and compress large BAM files multiple times. Results: We present SAMBLASTER, a tool that reduces the number of times such costly operations are performed. SAMBLASTER is designed to mark duplicates in read-sorted SAM files as a piped post-pass on DNA aligner output before it is compressed to BAM. In addition, it can simultaneously output into separate files the discordant read-pairs and/or split-read mappings used for structural variant calling. As an alignment post-pass, its own runtime overhead is negligible, while dramatically reducing overall pipeline complexity and runtime. As a stand-alone duplicate marking tool, it performs significantly better than PICARD or SAMBAMBA in terms of both speed and memory usage, while achieving nearly identical results. Availability and implementation: SAMBLASTER is open-source C++ code and freely available for download from https://github.com/GregoryFaust/samblaster. Contact: ude.ainigriv@y4hmi

634 citations


Authors

Showing all 53083 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joan Massagué189408149951
Michael Rutter188676151592
Gordon B. Mills1871273186451
Ralph Weissleder1841160142508
Gonçalo R. Abecasis179595230323
Jie Zhang1784857221720
John R. Yates1771036129029
John A. Rogers1771341127390
Bradley Cox1692150156200
Mika Kivimäki1661515141468
Hongfang Liu1662356156290
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
Ralph A. DeFronzo160759132993
Elio Riboli1581136110499
Dan R. Littman157426107164
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

96% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

96% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023189
2022783
20215,566
20205,600
20195,001
20184,586