Open Access
Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings / John M. Swales
John M. Swales
- Vol. 1991, Iss: 1991, pp 1-99
About:
The article was published on 1991-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 5640 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Citations, contexts, and humanistic discourse: Toward automatic extraction and classification
Chris Alen Sula,Matthew Miller +1 more
TL;DR: This paper presents an experimental tool for extracting and classifying citation contexts in humanities journal articles, and finds that extraction was highly successful for three of the four journals, and statistics were broadly consistent with previous research.
Journal ArticleDOI
An overview of research within the Genre and Multimodality framework
TL;DR: An overview of the research conducted within the Genre and Multimodality framework, which has been used to describe the multimodality of page-based documents and other multimodal artefacts over the past 15 years is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI
Research on advanced student writing across disciplines and levels: Introducing the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers
Annelie Ädel,Ute Römer +1 more
TL;DR: The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP) as discussed by the authors ) is a collection of essays written by highly advanced student writers whose written assignments have been awarded the grade "A".
Journal ArticleDOI
Moulding Interpersonal Relations through Conditional Clauses: Consensus-Building Strategies in Written Academic Discourse.
TL;DR: The authors focus on the interpersonal potential of the conditional clause as a rhetorical device for establishing a dialogue between the author and the reader of an academic text in search for shared understanding and consensus.
Journal ArticleDOI
The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals
TL;DR: The authors examined how linguistic choices are used for the construction of a view of marketing activity that corresponds to the expectations of a particular readership and compared the rhetorical resources used for building texts.