scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Copenhagen

EducationCopenhagen, Denmark
About: University of Copenhagen is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 57645 authors who have published 149740 publications receiving 5903093 citations. The organization is also known as: Copenhagen University & Københavns Universitet.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Carole Escartin1, Elena Galea2, Andras Lakatos3, James P. O'Callaghan4, Gabor C. Petzold5, Gabor C. Petzold6, Alberto Serrano-Pozo7, Christian Steinhäuser5, Andrea Volterra8, Giorgio Carmignoto9, Giorgio Carmignoto10, Amit Agarwal11, Nicola J. Allen12, Alfonso Araque13, Luis Barbeito14, Ari Barzilai15, Dwight E. Bergles16, Gilles Bonvento1, Arthur M. Butt17, Wei Ting Chen18, Martine Cohen-Salmon19, Colm Cunningham20, Benjamin Deneen21, Bart De Strooper22, Bart De Strooper18, Blanca Diaz-Castro23, Cinthia Farina, Marc R. Freeman24, Vittorio Gallo25, James E. Goldman26, Steven A. Goldman27, Steven A. Goldman28, Magdalena Götz29, Antonia Gutierrez30, Philip G. Haydon31, Dieter Henrik Heiland32, Elly M. Hol33, Matthew Holt18, Masamitsu Iino34, Ksenia V. Kastanenka7, Helmut Kettenmann35, Baljit S. Khakh36, Schuichi Koizumi37, C. Justin Lee, Shane A. Liddelow38, Brian A. MacVicar39, Pierre J. Magistretti40, Pierre J. Magistretti8, Albee Messing41, Anusha Mishra24, Anna V. Molofsky42, Keith K. Murai43, Christopher M. Norris44, Seiji Okada45, Stéphane H. R. Oliet46, João Filipe Oliveira47, João Filipe Oliveira48, Aude Panatier46, Vladimir Parpura49, Marcela Pekna50, Milos Pekny50, Luc Pellerin51, Gertrudis Perea52, Beatriz G. Pérez-Nievas53, Frank W. Pfrieger54, Kira E. Poskanzer42, Francisco J. Quintana7, Richard M. Ransohoff, Miriam Riquelme-Perez1, Stefanie Robel55, Christine R. Rose56, Jeffrey D. Rothstein16, Nathalie Rouach19, David H. Rowitch3, Alexey Semyanov57, Alexey Semyanov58, Swetlana Sirko29, Harald Sontheimer55, Raymond A. Swanson42, Javier Vitorica59, Ina B. Wanner36, Levi B. Wood60, Jia Qian Wu61, Binhai Zheng62, Eduardo R. Zimmer63, Robert Zorec64, Michael V. Sofroniew36, Alexei Verkhratsky65, Alexei Verkhratsky66 
Université Paris-Saclay1, Autonomous University of Barcelona2, University of Cambridge3, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health4, University of Bonn5, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases6, Harvard University7, University of Lausanne8, National Research Council9, University of Padua10, Heidelberg University11, Salk Institute for Biological Studies12, University of Minnesota13, Pasteur Institute14, Tel Aviv University15, Johns Hopkins University16, University of Portsmouth17, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven18, PSL Research University19, Trinity College, Dublin20, Baylor College of Medicine21, University College London22, University of Edinburgh23, Oregon Health & Science University24, National Institutes of Health25, Columbia University26, University of Rochester27, University of Copenhagen28, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich29, University of Málaga30, Tufts University31, University of Freiburg32, Utrecht University33, Nihon University34, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine35, University of California, Los Angeles36, University of Yamanashi37, New York University38, University of British Columbia39, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology40, University of Wisconsin-Madison41, University of California, San Francisco42, McGill University43, University of Kentucky44, Kyushu University45, University of Bordeaux46, Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave47, University of Minho48, University of Alabama at Birmingham49, University of Gothenburg50, University of Poitiers51, Cajal Institute52, King's College London53, University of Strasbourg54, Virginia Tech55, University of Düsseldorf56, Russian Academy of Sciences57, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University58, University of Seville59, Georgia Institute of Technology60, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston61, University of California, San Diego62, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul63, University of Ljubljana64, Ikerbasque65, University of Manchester66
TL;DR: In this article, the authors point out the shortcomings of binary divisions of reactive astrocytes into good-vs-bad, neurotoxic vs-neuroprotective or A1-vs.A2.
Abstract: Reactive astrocytes are astrocytes undergoing morphological, molecular, and functional remodeling in response to injury, disease, or infection of the CNS. Although this remodeling was first described over a century ago, uncertainties and controversies remain regarding the contribution of reactive astrocytes to CNS diseases, repair, and aging. It is also unclear whether fixed categories of reactive astrocytes exist and, if so, how to identify them. We point out the shortcomings of binary divisions of reactive astrocytes into good-vs-bad, neurotoxic-vs-neuroprotective or A1-vs-A2. We advocate, instead, that research on reactive astrocytes include assessment of multiple molecular and functional parameters-preferably in vivo-plus multivariate statistics and determination of impact on pathological hallmarks in relevant models. These guidelines may spur the discovery of astrocyte-based biomarkers as well as astrocyte-targeting therapies that abrogate detrimental actions of reactive astrocytes, potentiate their neuro- and glioprotective actions, and restore or augment their homeostatic, modulatory, and defensive functions.

797 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted genome-wide association studies of three phenotypes: subjective well-being (n = 298,420), depressive symptoms (n= 161,460), and neuroticism(n = 170,911).
Abstract: Very few genetic variants have been associated with depression and neuroticism, likely because of limitations on sample size in previous studies. Subjective well-being, a phenotype that is genetically correlated with both of these traits, has not yet been studied with genome-wide data. We conducted genome-wide association studies of three phenotypes: subjective well-being (n = 298,420), depressive symptoms (n = 161,460), and neuroticism (n = 170,911). We identify 3 variants associated with subjective well-being, 2 variants associated with depressive symptoms, and 11 variants associated with neuroticism, including 2 inversion polymorphisms. The two loci associated with depressive symptoms replicate in an independent depression sample. Joint analyses that exploit the high genetic correlations between the phenotypes (|ρ^| ≈ 0.8) strengthen the overall credibility of the findings and allow us to identify additional variants. Across our phenotypes, loci regulating expression in central nervous system and adrenal or pancreas tissues are strongly enriched for association.

796 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage appears to an important mechanism of action of urban particulate air pollution and related biomarkers and personal monitoring may be useful tools for risk characterization.
Abstract: Exposure to ambient air particulate matter (PM) is associated with pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases and cancer. The mechanisms of PM-induced health effects are believed to involve inflammation and oxidative stress. The oxidative stress mediated by PM may arise from direct generation of reactive oxygen species from the surface of particles, soluble compounds such as transition metals or organic compounds, altered function of mitochondria or NADPH-oxidase, and activation of inflammatory cells capable of generating ROS and reactive nitrogen species. Resulting oxidative DNA damage may be implicated in cancer risk and may serve as marker for oxidative stress relevant for other ailments caused by particulate air pollution. There is overwhelming evidence from animal experimental models, cell culture experiments, and cell free systems that exposure to diesel exhaust and diesel exhaust particles causes oxidative DNA damage. Similarly, various preparations of ambient air PM induce oxidative DNA damage in in vitro systems, whereas in vivo studies are scarce. Studies with various model/surrogate particle preparations, such as carbon black, suggest that the surface area is the most important determinant of effect for ultrafine particles (diameter less than 100 nm), whereas chemical composition may be more important for larger particles. The knowledge concerning mechanisms of action of PM has prompted the use of markers of oxidative stress and DNA damage for human biomonitoring in relation to ambient air. By means of personal monitoring and biomarkers a few studies have attempted to characterize individual exposure, explore mechanisms and identify significant sources to size fractions of ambient air PM with respect to relevant biological effects. In these studies guanine oxidation in DNA has been correlated with exposure to PM(2.5) and ultrafine particles outdoor and indoor. Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage appears to an important mechanism of action of urban particulate air pollution. Related biomarkers and personal monitoring may be useful tools for risk characterization.

795 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review highlights the current knowledge of tumor cell stromal interactions in the mammary gland with particular emphasis on cellular origins and functional phenotypes and on culture systems developed to dissect individual aspects of cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions.
Abstract: Reciprocal interactions between epithelium and mesenchyme mediate crucial aspects of embryonic development and direct the coordinated organogenesis, correct spatial orientation, and the timely expression of functional activity consistent with physiological demands. The mesenchymal equivalent in the adult organism is the stroma, i.e., the loose connective tissue that is separated from the epithelial compartment by an intact basement membrane. In carcinomas, the cellular organization is dramatically changed, and the stroma is extensively modified. The basement membrane is penetrated in a process of degradation and/or decreased synthesis, and direct contact between tumor cells and the surrounding stroma coincides with neovascularization, inflammatory cell influx, and extensive remodeling of extracellular matrix. In this review, we highlight our current knowledge of tumor cell stromal interactions in the mammary gland with particular emphasis on cellular origins and functional phenotypes. We focus both on normal mammary gland and breast tumors and on culture systems developed to dissect individual aspects of cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions.

794 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results illustrate major differences between crenarchaea and euryarchaea, especially for their DNA replication mechanism and cell cycle processes and their translational apparatus.
Abstract: The genome of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 contains 2,992,245 bp on a single chromosome and encodes 2,977 proteins and many RNAs. One-third of the encoded proteins have no detectable homologs in other sequenced genomes. Moreover, 40% appear to be archaeal-specific, and only 12% and 2.3% are shared exclusively with bacteria and eukarya, respectively. The genome shows a high level of plasticity with 200 diverse insertion sequence elements, many putative nonautonomous mobile elements, and evidence of integrase-mediated insertion events. There are also long clusters of regularly spaced tandem repeats. Different transfer systems are used for the uptake of inorganic and organic solutes, and a wealth of intracellular and extracellular proteases, sugar, and sulfur metabolizing enzymes are encoded, as well as enzymes of the central metabolic pathways and motility proteins. The major metabolic electron carrier is not NADH as in bacteria and eukarya but probably ferredoxin. The essential components required for DNA replication, DNA repair and recombination, the cell cycle, transcriptional initiation and translation, but not DNA folding, show a strong eukaryal character with many archaeal-specific features. The results illustrate major differences between crenarchaea and euryarchaea, especially for their DNA replication mechanism and cell cycle processes and their translational apparatus.

794 citations


Authors

Showing all 58387 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Michael Karin236704226485
Matthias Mann221887230213
Peer Bork206697245427
Ronald Klein1941305149140
Kenneth S. Kendler1771327142251
Dorret I. Boomsma1761507136353
Ramachandran S. Vasan1721100138108
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir167444121009
Mika Kivimäki1661515141468
Jun Wang1661093141621
Anders Björklund16576984268
Gerald I. Shulman164579109520
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Veikko Salomaa162843135046
Daniel J. Jacob16265676530
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

94% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

94% related

Karolinska Institutet
121.1K papers, 6M citations

93% related

Boston University
119.6K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023370
20221,266
202110,694
20209,956
20199,190
20188,620