Institution
University of Paris
Education•Paris, France•
About: University of Paris is a education organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 102426 authors who have published 174180 publications receiving 5041753 citations. The organization is also known as: Sorbonne.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Context (language use), Transplantation, Gene
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Columbia University1, University of Miami2, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill3, SUNY Downstate Medical Center4, University College London5, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust6, University of California, San Francisco7, University of California, Los Angeles8, University of Alabama at Birmingham9, Rio de Janeiro State University10, University of Guadalajara11, University of Düsseldorf12, New York University13, University of Barcelona14, Shanghai Jiao Tong University15, University of Lisbon16, Stellenbosch University17, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust18, Oregon Health & Science University19, University of Padua20, University of Leeds21, North Shore-LIJ Health System22, Northwestern University23, Medical University of South Carolina24, University of Birmingham25, Sun Yat-sen University26, Lille University of Science and Technology27, Charité28, Rutgers University29, Federal University of São Paulo30, University of Debrecen31, Imperial College London32, Emory University33, University of Liège34, University of Pittsburgh35, University of Paris36, University of the Witwatersrand37, California State University, Long Beach38, Royal Melbourne Hospital39, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center40, Autonomous University of Barcelona41, Pennsylvania State University42, Johns Hopkins University43, University of Szeged44, Duke University45, University of Colorado Denver46, Harvard University47, University of Cape Town48, University of Malaya49, Peking Union Medical College50
TL;DR: Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
Abstract: Recent studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may offer advantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these therapies have not been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Here, we report the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in a multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance) study. We randomly assigned 370 patients with classes III through V lupus nephritis to open-label MMF (target dosage 3 g/d) or IVC (0.5 to 1.0 g/m(2) in monthly pulses) in a 24-wk induction study. Both groups received prednisone, tapered from a maximum starting dosage of 60 mg/d. The primary end point was a prespecified decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio and stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine. Secondary end points included complete renal remission, systemic disease activity and damage, and safety. Overall, we did not detect a significantly different response rate between the two groups: 104 (56.2%) of 185 patients responded to MMF compared with 98 (53.0%) of 185 to IVC. Secondary end points were also similar between treatment groups. There were nine deaths in the MMF group and five in the IVC group. We did not detect significant differences between the MMF and IVC groups with regard to rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, or infections. Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
909 citations
••
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the risk of death of toxic epidermal necrolysis patients can be accurately predicted by the toxic epidescent severity-of-illness score, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score and burn score appear to be less adequate.
908 citations
••
TL;DR: The EROS-2 project was designed to test the hypothesis that massive compact halo objects (the so-called ''machos'') could be a major component of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way galaxy.
Abstract: The EROS-2 project was designed to test the hypothesis that massive compact halo objects (the so-called ''machos'') could be a major component of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way galaxy. To this end, EROS-2 monitored millions of stars in the Magellanic clouds for microlensing events caused by such objects. (abridged)
908 citations
••
University of Paris1, Newcastle University2, Rush University Medical Center3, Stavanger University Hospital4, University of Bergen5, King's College London6, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute7, Mayo Clinic8, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University9, University of California, Los Angeles10, McGill University11, Tel Aviv University12, French Institute of Health and Medical Research13, University of Louisville14, Juntendo University15, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai16, Innsbruck Medical University17, Instituto de Medicina Molecular18, University of Barcelona19, Istanbul University20
TL;DR: The main focus of this article is to operationalize the diagnosis of PD‐D and to propose pratical guidelines based on a two level process depending upon the clinical scenario and the expertise of the evaluator involved in the assessment.
Abstract: A preceding article described the clinical features of Parkinson's disease dementia (PD-D) and proposed clinical diagnostic criteria for "probable" and "possible" PD-D. The main focus of this article is to operationalize the diagnosis of PD-D and to propose practical guidelines based on a two level process depending upon the clinical scenario and the expertise of the evaluator involved in the assessment. Level I is aimed primarily at the clinician with no particular expertise in neuropsychological methods, but who requires a simple, pragmatic set of tests that are not excessively time-consuming. Level I can be used alone or in concert with Level II, which is more suitable when there is the need to specify the pattern and the severity on the dementia of PD-D for clinical monitoring, research studies or pharmacological trials. Level II tests can also be proposed when the diagnosis of PD-D remains uncertain or equivocal at the end of a Level I evaluation. Given the lack of evidence-based standards for some tests when applied in this clinical context, we have tried to make practical and unambiguous recommendations, based upon the available literature and the collective experience of the Task Force. We accept, however, that further validation of certain tests and modifications in the recommended cut off values will be required through future studies.
907 citations
••
TL;DR: The heart-rate profile during exercise and recovery is a predictor of sudden death among apparently healthy persons, with a moderate but significantly increased risk of death from any cause but not of nonsudden death from myocardial infarction.
Abstract: background Changes in heart rate during exercise and recovery from exercise are mediated by the balance between sympathetic and vagal activity. Since alterations in the neural control of cardiac function contribute to the risk of sudden death, we tested the hypothesis that among apparently healthy persons, sudden death is more likely to occur in the presence of abnormal heart-rate profiles during exercise and recovery. methods A total of 5713 asymptomatic working men (between the ages of 42 and 53 years), none of whom had clinically detectable cardiovascular disease, underwent standardized graded exercise testing between 1967 and 1972. We examined data on the subjects’ resting heart rates, the increase in rate from the resting level to the peak exercise level, and the decrease in rate from the peak exercise level to the level one minute after the termination of exercise. results During a 23-year follow-up period, 81 subjects died suddenly. The risk of sudden death from myocardial infarction was increased in subjects with a resting heart rate that was more than 75 beats per minute (relative risk, 3.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.91 to 8.00); in subjects with an increase in heart rate during exercise that was less than 89 beats per minute (relative risk, 6.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.37 to 16.11); and in subjects with a decrease in heart rate of less than 25 beats per minute after the termination of exercise (relative risk, 2.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 4.74). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, these three factors remained strongly associated with an increased risk of sudden death, with a moderate but significantly increased risk of death from any cause but not of nonsudden death from myocardial infarction. conclusions The heart-rate profile during exercise and recovery is a predictor of sudden death.
904 citations
Authors
Showing all 102613 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Guido Kroemer | 236 | 1404 | 246571 |
David H. Weinberg | 183 | 700 | 171424 |
Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
Sophie Henrot-Versille | 171 | 957 | 157040 |
Richard H. Friend | 169 | 1182 | 140032 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
Mika Kivimäki | 166 | 1515 | 141468 |
Martin Karplus | 163 | 831 | 138492 |
William J. Sandborn | 162 | 1317 | 108564 |
Darien Wood | 160 | 2174 | 136596 |
Monique M.B. Breteler | 159 | 546 | 93762 |
Paul Emery | 158 | 1314 | 121293 |
Wolfgang Wagner | 156 | 2342 | 123391 |
Joao Seixas | 153 | 1538 | 115070 |