Institution
University of Salford
Education•Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom•
About: University of Salford is a education organization based out in Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 13049 authors who have published 22957 publications receiving 537330 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Salford Manchester & The University of Salford Manchester.
Topics: Population, Context (language use), Health care, Thin film, Ion
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The findings revealed that respondents were generally satisfied with their clinical placements and there was clear support for the mentorship approach; 57% of respondents had a successful mentorship experience although some 18% of respondent experienced unsuccessful supervision.
309 citations
••
Humboldt University of Berlin1, University of California2, University of St Andrews3, University of Freiburg4, University of Arizona5, Harvard University6, University of Kansas7, California Academy of Sciences8, Agro ParisTech9, University of Savoy10, University of Salford11, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne12, University of Connecticut13
TL;DR: This work proposes a standard protocol for reporting SDMs, and introduces a structured format for documenting and communicating the models, ensuring transparency and reproducibility, facilitating peer review and expert evaluation of model quality, as well as meta-analyses.
Abstract: Species distribution models (SDMs) constitute the most common class of models
across ecology, evolution and conservation. The advent of ready-to-use software pack
-
ages and increasing availability of digital geoinformation have considerably assisted
the application of SDMs in the past decade, greatly enabling their broader use for
informing conservation and management, and for quantifying impacts from global
change. However, models must be fit for purpose, with all important aspects of their
development and applications properly considered. Despite the widespread use of
SDMs, standardisation and documentation of modelling protocols remain limited,
which makes it hard to assess whether development steps are appropriate for end use.
To address these issues, we propose a standard protocol for reporting SDMs, with an
emphasis on describing how a study’s objective is achieved through a series of model
-
ing decisions. We call this the ODMAP (Overview, Data, Model, Assessment and
Prediction) protocol, as its components reflect the main steps involved in building
SDMs and other empirically-based biodiversity models. The ODMAP protocol serves
two main purposes. First, it provides a checklist for authors, detailing key steps for model building and analyses, and thus represents a quick guide and generic workflow for modern SDMs. Second, it introduces
a structured format for documenting and communicating the models, ensuring transparency and reproducibility, facilitating
peer review and expert evaluation of model quality, as well as meta-analyses. We detail all elements of ODMAP, and explain
how it can be used for different model objectives and applications, and how it complements efforts to store associated metadata
and define modelling standards. We illustrate its utility by revisiting nine previously published case studies, and provide an
interactive web-based application to facilitate its use. We plan to advance ODMAP by encouraging its further refinement and
adoption by the scientific community.
309 citations
••
TL;DR: The results indicate the importance of attentional effects on the pattern of nociceptive processing in the brain and provide the first clear demonstration, within a single experiment, of a major division of function within the neural pain matrix.
Abstract: Functional imaging studies have identified a matrix of structures in the brain that respond to noxious stimuli. Within this matrix, a division of function between sensory-discriminative and affective responses has so far been demonstrated by manipulating either pain intensity or unpleasantness under hypnosis in two different normal volunteer groups studied on separate occasions. Our study used positron emission tomography (PET) to demonstrate this division of function under more natural conditions in a healthy group of volunteers, using a CO(2) laser to provide nociceptive stimuli that selectively activate A-delta and C-fibres without contamination by touch sensations. We measured the differential cerebral responses to noxious and innocuous laser stimuli during conditions of selective attention to either the unpleasantness or location of the stimuli. Attention to location increased responses in the contralateral (right) primary somatosensory and inferior parietal cortices. This result implies that these components of the lateral pain system are concerned mainly with the localization of pain. In contrast, attention to unpleasantness increased responses in bilateral perigenual cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices, contralateral (right) amygdala, ipsilateral (left) hypothalamus, posterior insula, M1 and frontal pole. These areas comprise key components of the medial pain and neuroendocrine systems and the results suggest that they have a role in the affective response to pain. Our results indicate the importance of attentional effects on the pattern of nociceptive processing in the brain. They also provide the first clear demonstration, within a single experiment, of a major division of function within the neural pain matrix.
308 citations
••
TL;DR: The results support the importance of assessing the effects of stress in patients' adjustment to their condition and may indicate a role for adjunctive psychological stress management training for a significant number of patients with psoriasis.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was: (i) to examine the impact of the clinical severity, anatomical location and treatment of psoriasis on patients' quality of life, and (ii) to investigate the effects of perceptions of psoriasis-related stress on patients' physical and mental health and on areas of disability in everyday life. All patients (n = 204) attending a psoriasis specialty clinic were invited to complete a multidimensional quality of life assessment comprising the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI), the SF-36 Health Survey and the Psoriasis Life Stress Inventory (PLSI). Results (n = 150) indicated that overall clinical severity of psoriasis as assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and duration of psoriasis, were unrelated to impairment in any areas of quality of life. Anatomical location (social visibility) of psoriasis was associated with self-report of poor physical health (P = 0.01), and there was a modest association with patients' mental health (P = 0.04); however, anatomical location of psoriasis was not significantly associated with self-reported disability in everyday life, or stress scores. Patients who were classified as more reactive to the stress associated with psoriasis (78% of the sample) were functioning less well in terms of their mental health (P = 0.001) and also experienced significantly more disability in all areas of everyday life (P = 0.001). Differences in method of treatment for psoriasis did not significantly affect scores on the psoriasis-specific (PDI; PLSI) or generic (SF-36) quality of life measures. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated that stress resulting from anticipating other people's reactions to their psoriasis contributed more to the variance in patients' disability in everyday life than any other medical or health status variable. The results support the importance of assessing the effects of stress in patients' adjustment to their condition and may indicate a role for adjunctive psychological stress management training for a significant number of patients with psoriasis.
308 citations
••
TL;DR: Psychological factors were much stronger determinants of disability in patients with psoriasis than disease severity, location or duration and this has important implications in relation to the clinical management of Psoriasis.
303 citations
Authors
Showing all 13134 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Hongjie Dai | 197 | 570 | 182579 |
Michael P. Lisanti | 151 | 631 | 85150 |
Matthew Jones | 125 | 1161 | 96909 |
David W. Denning | 113 | 736 | 66604 |
Wayne Hall | 111 | 1260 | 75606 |
Richard Gray | 109 | 808 | 78580 |
Christopher E.M. Griffiths | 108 | 671 | 47675 |
Thomas P. Davis | 107 | 724 | 41495 |
Nicholas Tarrier | 92 | 326 | 25881 |
David M. A. Mann | 88 | 338 | 43292 |
Ajith Abraham | 86 | 1113 | 31834 |
Federica Sotgia | 85 | 247 | 28751 |
Mike Hulme | 84 | 300 | 35436 |
Robert N. Foley | 84 | 260 | 31580 |
Richard Baker | 83 | 514 | 22970 |