Institution
Maastricht University
Education•Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands•
About: Maastricht University is a education organization based out in Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 19263 authors who have published 53291 publications receiving 2266866 citations. The organization is also known as: Universiteit Maastricht & UM.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that intestinal organoids can serve as a model to understand SARS-CoV-2 biology and infectivity in the gut, and hSIOs serve as an experimental model for coronavirus infection and biology.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can cause coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an influenza-like disease that is primarily thought to infect the lungs with transmission through the respiratory route. However, clinical evidence suggests that the intestine may present another viral target organ. Indeed, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is highly expressed on differentiated enterocytes. In human small intestinal organoids (hSIOs), enterocytes were readily infected by SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, as demonstrated by confocal and electron microscopy. Enterocytes produced infectious viral particles, whereas messenger RNA expression analysis of hSIOs revealed induction of a generic viral response program. Therefore, the intestinal epithelium supports SARS-CoV-2 replication, and hSIOs serve as an experimental model for coronavirus infection and biology.
1,276 citations
University of Manchester1, Boston University2, Medical University of Vienna3, University of Ottawa4, VU University Amsterdam5, Leiden University6, Johns Hopkins University7, Columbia University8, University of Pisa9, University of Melbourne10, University of York11, University of Florence12, University of Paris13, University of Leeds14, University of California, Los Angeles15, University of Santiago de Compostela16, University of Toronto17, University of Bristol18, Maastricht University19, University of Nebraska Medical Center20, Autonomous University of Madrid21, New York University22, Food and Drug Administration23, Genentech24, Stanford University25, University of Basel26, MedImmune27, University of Kansas28
TL;DR: It is proposed that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (1) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint counts, CRP level, and patient global assessment are all ≤1, or (2) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is ≤3.
Abstract: Objective Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used defi nition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a defi nition. Methods A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecifi ed analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent defi nition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to defi ne remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate defi nitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as defi nitions using disease activity indexes. To select a defi nition of remission, trial data were analysed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes. Results Survey results for the defi nition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (eg, tender and swollen joint counts, C reactive protein (CRP) level, and global assessments on a 0–10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patientreported measure. Examination of 2-year follow-up data suggested that many candidate defi nitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score–based measures of remission did not
1,273 citations
University Medical Center Groningen1, Novosibirsk State University2, Harvard University3, Aalto University4, Maastricht University5, Rega Institute for Medical Research6, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven7, Wageningen University and Research Centre8, Radboud University Nijmegen9, Broad Institute10, Vrije Universiteit Brussel11
TL;DR: Deep sequencing of the gut microbiomes of 1135 participants from a Dutch population-based cohort shows relations between the microbiome and 126 exogenous and intrinsic host factors, including 31 intrinsic factors, 12 diseases, 19 drug groups, 4 smoking categories, and 60 dietary factors, and an important step toward a better understanding of environment-diet-microbe-host interactions.
Abstract: Deep sequencing of the gut microbiomes of 1135 participants from a Dutch population-based cohort shows relations between the microbiome and 126 exogenous and intrinsic host factors, including 31 intrinsic factors, 12 diseases, 19 drug groups, 4 smoking categories, and 60 dietary factors. These factors collectively explain 18.7% of the variation seen in the interindividual distance of microbial composition. We could associate 110 factors to 125 species and observed that fecal chromogranin A (CgA), a protein secreted by enteroendocrine cells, was exclusively associated with 61 microbial species whose abundance collectively accounted for 53% of microbial composition. Low CgA concentrations were seen in individuals with a more diverse microbiome. These results are an important step toward a better understanding of environment-diet-microbe-host interactions.
1,272 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Pennsylvania2, Mayo Clinic3, University of Barcelona4, St George's, University of London5, Maastricht University6, Cleveland Clinic7, University of Virginia8, Baylor University9, Virginia Commonwealth University10, Thomas Jefferson University11, Beaumont Hospital12, University of Bordeaux13, Leipzig University14, University of Oklahoma15, University of Michigan16, Royal Melbourne Hospital17, University College Dublin18, Korea University19, University of Münster20, University of Birmingham21, University of Western Ontario22, Imperial College London23, Harvard University24, Northwestern University25, National Yang-Ming University26, Washington University in St. Louis27, Université de Montréal28, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai29, University of California, Los Angeles30, Loyola University Chicago31
TL;DR: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), was published in this paper.
1,271 citations
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven1, University of Toronto2, Charles University in Prague3, Maastricht University4, University of South Florida5, Lyon College6, University of Chicago7, Curie Institute8, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart9, University of São Paulo10, University of Liverpool11, University of Rochester12, Drug Abuse Resistance Education13
TL;DR: There is mounting data regarding the utility of GA in oncology practice; however, additional research is needed to continue to strengthen the evidence base.
Abstract: Purpose To update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on geriatric assessment (GA) in older patients with cancer. Methods SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care. Results GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensit...
1,266 citations
Authors
Showing all 19492 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edward Giovannucci | 206 | 1671 | 179875 |
| Julie E. Buring | 186 | 950 | 132967 |
| Aaron R. Folsom | 181 | 1118 | 134044 |
| John J.V. McMurray | 178 | 1389 | 184502 |
| Alvaro Pascual-Leone | 165 | 969 | 98251 |
| Lex M. Bouter | 158 | 767 | 103034 |
| David T. Felson | 153 | 861 | 133514 |
| Walter Paulus | 149 | 809 | 86252 |
| Michael Conlon O'Donovan | 142 | 736 | 118857 |
| Randy L. Buckner | 141 | 346 | 110354 |
| Philip Scheltens | 140 | 1175 | 107312 |
| Anne Tjønneland | 139 | 1345 | 91556 |
| Ewout W. Steyerberg | 139 | 1226 | 84896 |
| James G. Herman | 138 | 410 | 120628 |
| Andrew Steptoe | 137 | 1003 | 73431 |