Institution
University of Adelaide
Education•Adelaide, South Australia, Australia•
About: University of Adelaide is a education organization based out in Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Pregnancy. The organization has 27251 authors who have published 79167 publications receiving 2671128 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of Adelaide & Adelaide University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, a new conceptual framework for understanding professional culture in organizational context is proposed, and the interrelationship between four different types of professional subculture and organizational culture is illustrated in a case-study analysis of an Australian home care service.
Abstract: This paper formulates a new conceptual framework for understanding profes sional culture in organizational context. Our analysis begins with an attempt to identify the complex interplay between individual sense-making, group beliefs and culture. The process of professionalization and the development of profes sional cultures is described and the influence of professional belief systems on organizational culture is examined. The inter-relationship between four different types of professional subculture and organizational culture is illustrated in a case- study analysis of an Australian home-care service. The stability of an organiza tion's operating environment is identified as a major factor which facilitates and constrains the propensity for professional subcultures to radically transform or incrementally refine dominant organizational cultures. The paper concludes with a critical reappraisal of the significance of professional subculture as a determin ant of an organization's cultural system.
366 citations
TL;DR: This work builds on the nursery concept by developing a framework for evaluating juvenile habitats based on their overall contribution to adult populations, and introduces the concept of Effective Juvenile Habitat (EJH) to refer to habitats that make a greater than average overall contributionto adult populations.
Abstract: Much recent attention has been focused on juvenile fish and invertebrate habitat use, particularly defining and identifying marine nurseries. The most significant advancement in this area has been the development of a standardized framework for assessing the relative importance of juvenile habitats and classifying the most productive as nurseries. Within this framework, a marine nursery is defined as a juvenile habitat for a particular species that contributes a greater than average number of individuals to the adult population on a per-unit-area basis, as compared to other habitats used by juveniles. While the nursery definition and framework provides a powerful approach to identifying habitats for conservation and restoration efforts, it can omit habitats that have a small per-unit-area contribution to adult populations, but may be essential for sustaining adult populations. Here we build on the nursery concept by developing a framework for evaluating juvenile habitats based on their overall contribution to adult populations, and introduce the concept of Effective Juvenile Habitat (EJH) to refer to habitats that make a greater than average overall contribution to adult populations.
365 citations
Nottingham Trent University1, Ghent University2, Karolinska Institutet3, University of Sydney4, Eötvös Loránd University5, University of Bergen6, University of Mainz7, Johns Hopkins University8, University of California, Berkeley9, University of Adelaide10, Stanford University11, Université catholique de Louvain12, University of Münster13, Ramon Llull University14, Stetson University15, Yale University16, McGill University17, University of Twente18, Middlesex University19, University of Derby20
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the recent debate paper by Petry et al. that argued there was now an international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD), however, they do not provide a true and representative international community of researchers in this area.
Abstract: This commentary paper critically discusses the recent debate paper by Petry et al. (2014) that argued there was now an international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD). Our collective opinions vary considerably regarding many different aspects of online gaming. However, we contend that the paper by Petry and colleagues does not provide a true and representative international community of researchers in this area. This paper critically discusses and provides commentary on (i) the representativeness of the international group that wrote the ‘consensus’ paper, and (ii) each of the IGD criteria. The paper also includes a brief discussion on initiatives that could be taken to move the field towards consensus. It is hoped that this paper will foster debate in the IGD field and lead to improved theory, better methodologically designed studies, and more robust empirical evidence as regards problematic gaming and its psychosocial consequences and impact.
365 citations
University of Michigan1, Cornell University2, University of Pennsylvania3, University of Massachusetts Medical School4, Baylor College of Medicine5, University of Naples Federico II6, Spanish National Research Council7, Complutense University of Madrid8, New York University9, Boston Children's Hospital10, University of Rome Tor Vergata11, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital12, University of Pittsburgh13, University of Paris14, French Institute of Health and Medical Research15, National University of Cuyo16, Albert Einstein College of Medicine17, University of New Mexico18, Goethe University Frankfurt19, Weizmann Institute of Science20, University of Turku21, Sapienza University of Rome22, Virginia Commonwealth University23, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital24, Discovery Institute25, University of Copenhagen26, University of Tromsø27, Eötvös Loránd University28, Merck & Co.29, University of Freiburg30, Babraham Institute31, University of South Australia32, University of Adelaide33, University of Oviedo34, University of Chicago35, University of Graz36, National Institutes of Health37, City University of New York38, Queens College39, University of Tokyo40, University of Zurich41, Austrian Academy of Sciences42, University of British Columbia43, University of California, San Francisco44, Russian Academy of Sciences45, University Medical Center Groningen46, University of Cambridge47, University of Glasgow48, Rutgers University49, University of Padua50, University of Bern51, Kazan Federal University52, University of Oxford53, University of Oslo54, Oslo University Hospital55, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas56, University of Crete57, Francis Crick Institute58, Osaka University59, Chinese Academy of Sciences60, Harvard University61, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai62, Shanghai Jiao Tong University63, Karolinska Institutet64
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Abstract: Autophagy is a core molecular pathway for the preservation of cellular and organismal homeostasis. Pharmacological and genetic interventions impairing autophagy responses promote or aggravate disease in a plethora of experimental models. Consistently, mutations in autophagy-related processes cause severe human pathologies. Here, we review and discuss preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
365 citations
18 Jun 2018
TL;DR: Zhang et al. as discussed by the authors proposed a repulsion loss to prevent the proposal from shifting to surrounding objects, thus leading to more crowd-robust localization. But the repulsion term was not considered in our work.
Abstract: Detecting individual pedestrians in a crowd remains a challenging problem since the pedestrians often gather together and occlude each other in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we first explore how a state-of-the-art pedestrian detector is harmed by crowd occlusion via experimentation, providing insights into the crowd occlusion problem. Then, we propose a novel bounding box regression loss specifically designed for crowd scenes, termed repulsion loss. This loss is driven by two motivations: the attraction by target, and the repulsion by other surrounding objects. The repulsion term prevents the proposal from shifting to surrounding objects thus leading to more crowd-robust localization. Our detector trained by repulsion loss outperforms the state-of-the-art methods with a significant improvement in occlusion cases.
364 citations
Authors
Showing all 27579 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin White | 196 | 2038 | 232387 |
| Nicholas G. Martin | 192 | 1770 | 161952 |
| David W. Johnson | 160 | 2714 | 140778 |
| Nicholas J. Talley | 158 | 1571 | 90197 |
| Mark E. Cooper | 158 | 1463 | 124887 |
| Xiang Zhang | 154 | 1733 | 117576 |
| John E. Morley | 154 | 1377 | 97021 |
| Howard I. Scher | 151 | 944 | 101737 |
| Christopher M. Dobson | 150 | 1008 | 105475 |
| A. Artamonov | 150 | 1858 | 119791 |
| Timothy P. Hughes | 145 | 831 | 91357 |
| Christopher Hill | 144 | 1562 | 128098 |
| Shi-Zhang Qiao | 142 | 523 | 80888 |
| Paul Jackson | 141 | 1372 | 93464 |
| H. A. Neal | 141 | 1903 | 115480 |