Institution
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Education•Tehran, Iran•
About: Tehran University of Medical Sciences is a education organization based out in Tehran, Iran. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 35661 authors who have published 57234 publications receiving 878523 citations. The organization is also known as: TUMS.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Cancer, Randomized controlled trial, Health care
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation1, University of Washington2, University College London3, Qatar Foundation4, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences5, University of Otago6, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham7, University of Melbourne8, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center9, Universiti Sains Malaysia10, Burnet Institute11, George Mason University12, Dartmouth College13, Tehran University of Medical Sciences14, University of Bristol15, University of California, San Diego16, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center17, Environment Agency18, University of Chicago19, Erasmus University Rotterdam20, Cancer Treatment Centers of America21, Case Western Reserve University22, Bayer23, Tufts Medical Center24, Stanford University25, National Research University – Higher School of Economics26, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention27, Jackson State University28, Wuhan University29, Mansoura University30, Imperial College London31
TL;DR: The enormous health loss attributable to viral hepatitis, and the availability of effective vaccines and treatments, suggests an important opportunity to improve public health.
1,081 citations
Iran University of Medical Sciences1, Sharif University of Technology2, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry3, Shahid Beheshti University4, University of Kerala5, Kharazmi University6, Islamic Azad University7, Tehran University of Medical Sciences8, Boston University9, Harvard University10, University of Tehran11, Massachusetts Institute of Technology12
TL;DR: This review highlights the recent advances of smart MNPs categorized according to their activation stimulus (physical, chemical, or biological) and looks forward to future pharmaceutical applications.
Abstract: New achievements in the realm of nanoscience and innovative techniques of nanomedicine have moved micro/nanoparticles (MNPs) to the point of becoming actually useful for practical applications in the near future. Various differences between the extracellular and intracellular environments of cancerous and normal cells and the particular characteristics of tumors such as physicochemical properties, neovasculature, elasticity, surface electrical charge, and pH have motivated the design and fabrication of inventive “smart” MNPs for stimulus-responsive controlled drug release. These novel MNPs can be tailored to be responsive to pH variations, redox potential, enzymatic activation, thermal gradients, magnetic fields, light, and ultrasound (US), or can even be responsive to dual or multi-combinations of different stimuli. This unparalleled capability has increased their importance as site-specific controlled drug delivery systems (DDSs) and has encouraged their rapid development in recent years. An in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these DDS approaches is expected to further contribute to this groundbreaking field of nanomedicine. Smart nanocarriers in the form of MNPs that can be triggered by internal or external stimulus are summarized and discussed in the present review, including pH-sensitive peptides and polymers, redox-responsive micelles and nanogels, thermo- or magnetic-responsive nanoparticles (NPs), mechanical- or electrical-responsive MNPs, light or ultrasound-sensitive particles, and multi-responsive MNPs including dual stimuli-sensitive nanosheets of graphene. This review highlights the recent advances of smart MNPs categorized according to their activation stimulus (physical, chemical, or biological) and looks forward to future pharmaceutical applications.
1,072 citations
TL;DR: The prevalence of IBD increased substantially in many regions from 1990 to 2017, which might pose a substantial social and economic burden on governments and health systems in the coming years.
1,016 citations
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation1, University of Louisville2, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences3, Karolinska Institutet4, Centre for Mental Health5, University of Queensland6, Tehran University of Medical Sciences7, South African Medical Research Council8, University of KwaZulu-Natal9, University of Colorado Boulder10, University of California, Irvine11, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center12, Montefiore Medical Center13, Northeastern University14, University of Alabama at Birmingham15, Brown University16, San Diego State University17, University of Melbourne18, Albert Einstein College of Medicine19, Cambridge Health Alliance20, Johns Hopkins University21, University of Pittsburgh22, University of Cape Town23, Marshall University24, Case Western Reserve University25, University of London26, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign27, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre28, Harvard University29, University of California, San Diego30, Yale University31, Georgetown University32, Veterans Health Administration33, Jackson State University34, University of Massachusetts Boston35, State University of New York System36, Simmons College37, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science38, University of California, Los Angeles39, University of Oxford40, Norwegian Institute of Public Health41, Pacific Institute42, Curtin University43, Heidelberg University44, Jimma University45, Northwestern University46, Washington University in St. Louis47, Howard University48, University of New Mexico49, University at Buffalo50, University of Washington51, University of South Florida52, Tufts University53, University of Rochester Medical Center54, Kosin University55, Central South University56, Michigan State University57, Ball State University58, Nova Southeastern University59, Dalhousie University60, Mayo Clinic61, University of British Columbia62, Ohio State University63, Baylor University64, Jagiellonian University Medical College65, Wrocław Medical University66, Dartmouth College67, University of Western Ontario68, Oregon Health & Science University69, Virginia Commonwealth University70, Columbia University71, University of Canberra72, Aga Khan University73
TL;DR: There are wide differences in the burden of disease at the state level and specific diseases and risk factors, such as drug use disorders, high BMI, poor diet, high fasting plasma glucose level, and alcohol use disorders are increasing and warrant increased attention.
Abstract: Introduction Several studies have measured health outcomes in the United States, but none have provided a comprehensive assessment of patterns of health by state. Objective To use the results of the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to report trends in the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors at the state level from 1990 to 2016. Design and Setting A systematic analysis of published studies and available data sources estimates the burden of disease by age, sex, geography, and year. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence, incidence, mortality, life expectancy, healthy life expectancy (HALE), years of life lost (YLLs) due to premature mortality, years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 causes and 84 risk factors with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were computed. Results Between 1990 and 2016, overall death rates in the United States declined from 745.2 (95% UI, 740.6 to 749.8) per 100 000 persons to 578.0 (95% UI, 569.4 to 587.1) per 100 000 persons. The probability of death among adults aged 20 to 55 years declined in 31 states and Washington, DC from 1990 to 2016. In 2016, Hawaii had the highest life expectancy at birth (81.3 years) and Mississippi had the lowest (74.7 years), a 6.6-year difference. Minnesota had the highest HALE at birth (70.3 years), and West Virginia had the lowest (63.8 years), a 6.5-year difference. The leading causes of DALYs in the United States for 1990 and 2016 were ischemic heart disease and lung cancer, while the third leading cause in 1990 was low back pain, and the third leading cause in 2016 was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Opioid use disorders moved from the 11th leading cause of DALYs in 1990 to the 7th leading cause in 2016, representing a 74.5% (95% UI, 42.8% to 93.9%) change. In 2016, each of the following 6 risks individually accounted for more than 5% of risk-attributable DALYs: tobacco consumption, high body mass index (BMI), poor diet, alcohol and drug use, high fasting plasma glucose, and high blood pressure. Across all US states, the top risk factors in terms of attributable DALYs were due to 1 of the 3 following causes: tobacco consumption (32 states), high BMI (10 states), or alcohol and drug use (8 states). Conclusions and Relevance There are wide differences in the burden of disease at the state level. Specific diseases and risk factors, such as drug use disorders, high BMI, poor diet, high fasting plasma glucose level, and alcohol use disorders are increasing and warrant increased attention. These data can be used to inform national health priorities for research, clinical care, and policy.
962 citations
Christina Fitzmaurice1, Christina Fitzmaurice2, Tomi Akinyemiju3, Faris Lami4 +172 more•Institutions (95)
901 citations
Authors
Showing all 35946 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graeme J. Hankey | 137 | 844 | 143373 |
| Paul D.P. Pharoah | 130 | 794 | 71338 |
| Jerome Ritz | 120 | 644 | 47987 |
| Reza Malekzadeh | 118 | 900 | 139272 |
| Robert N. Weinreb | 117 | 1124 | 59101 |
| Javad Parvizi | 111 | 969 | 51075 |
| Omid C. Farokhzad | 110 | 329 | 64226 |
| Ali Mohammadi | 106 | 1149 | 54596 |
| Alexander R. Vaccaro | 102 | 1179 | 39346 |
| John R. Speakman | 95 | 667 | 34484 |
| Philip J. Devereaux | 94 | 443 | 110428 |
| Rafael Lozano | 94 | 265 | 126513 |
| Mohammad Abdollahi | 90 | 1045 | 35531 |
| Ingmar Skoog | 89 | 458 | 28998 |
| Morteza Mahmoudi | 83 | 334 | 26229 |