Open AccessProceedings Article
Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Wrensch et al. as mentioned in this paper found that variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility and showed that the direction of association was the same in discovery and replication phases.Abstract:
LETTERS Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility Margaret Wrensch 1,2,12 , Robert B Jenkins 3,12 , Jeffrey S Chang 4,12 , Ru-Fang Yeh 4,12 , Yuanyuan Xiao 4 , Paul A Decker 5 , Karla V Ballman 5 , Mitchel Berger 1 , Jan C Buckner 6 , Susan Chang 1 , Caterina Giannini 3 , Chandralekha Halder 3 , Thomas M Kollmeyer 3 , Matthew L Kosel 5 , Daniel H LaChance 7 , Lucie McCoy 1 , Brian P O’Neill 7 , Joe Patoka 1 , Alexander R Pico 8 , Michael Prados 1 , Charles Quesenberry 9 , Terri Rice 1 , Amanda L Rynearson 3 , Ivan Smirnov 1 , Tarik Tihan 10 , Joe Wiemels 2,4 , Ping Yang 11,13 & John K Wiencke 1,2,13 The causes of glioblastoma and other gliomas remain obscure 1,2 To discover new candidate genes influencing glioma susceptibility, we conducted a principal component– adjusted 3 genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 275,895 autosomal variants among 692 adult high-grade glioma cases (622 from the San Francisco Adult Glioma Study (AGS) and 70 from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)) 4 and 3,992 controls (602 from AGS and 3,390 from Illumina iControlDB (iControls)) For replication, we analyzed the 13 SNPs with P o 10 A6 using independent data from 176 high-grade glioma cases and 174 controls from the Mayo Clinic On 9p21, rs1412829 near CDKN2B had discovery P ¼ 34 Â 10 A8 , replication P ¼ 00038 and combined P ¼ 185 Â 10 A10 On 20q133, rs6010620 intronic to RTEL1 had discovery P ¼ 15 Â 10 A7 , replication P ¼ 000035 and combined P ¼ 340 Â 10 A9 For both SNPs, the direction of association was the same in discovery and replication phases Subject characteristics, including participation rates for the discovery GWAS and replication phases, are listed in Supplementary Table 1a,b The distribution of P values from the principal component–adjusted logistic regression additive model across the genome for high-grade glioma cases versus controls (Fig 1) suggests potentially meaningful associations for several SNPs on chromosomes 1, 5, 9, 11 and 20 Supplementary Table 2 summarizes results for the 13 SNPs with P o 10 A6 for association with high-grade glioma in discovery data along with results from replication data; SNPs with Hardy-Weinberg P o 10 A5 in controls or with 45% missing data in any case or control group were excluded Three of these 13 SNPs (rs1412829 on 9p21, and rs6010620 and rs4809324 intronic to RTEL1 on 20q133) had significant association with high-grade glioma risk in the discovery phase (principal component analysis P o 18 Â 10 A7 ), were inde- pendent risk predictors in a multivariable analysis of 13 top hits, and were replicated in the Mayo Clinic dataset (Table 1) As shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2, the minor allele frequencies for the three SNPs consistently differed in the same direction between high-grade glioma cases and controls regardless of data source (AGS, TCGA, iControls or Mayo Clinic) Supplementary Table 3 shows results from the multivariable model of discovery data that included all 13 SNPs (four from the 9p21 region, three in RTEL1, plus six others in other locations) Eight SNPs, including one in the 9p21 region and two intronic to RTEL1, remained independently associated with high- grade glioma risk after adjustment for other SNPs This was expected given the strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) evident for the four 9p21 SNPs and two of the three RTEL1 SNPs (Supplementary Table 4) In discovery data, only the interaction between chromosome 9p21 SNP rs1412829 and TERT SNP rs2736100 on chromosome 5 was statistically significant with Wald test P ¼ 0019 (see Supplementary P value Chromosome © 2009 Nature America, Inc All rights reserved Figure 1 Distribution of P values from principal component–adjusted logistic regression additive model across the genome for high-grade glioma cases versus controls The 13 SNPs with P o 10 A6 are shown in red 1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 2 Institute of Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 3 Department of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 5 Division of Biostatistics, 6 Department of Oncology and 7 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 8 Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 9 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA 10 Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 11 Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 12 These authors contributed equally to this work 13 These authors jointly directed the work Correspondence should be addressed to MW (margaretwrensch@ucsfedu) Received 13 March; accepted 1 June; published online 5 July 2009; doi:101038/ng408 NATURE GENETICS ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATIONread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Genome-wide association study of glioma and meta-analysis.
Preetha Rajaraman,Beatrice Melin,Zhaoming Wang,Zhaoming Wang,Roberta McKean-Cowdin,Dominique S. Michaud,Dominique S. Michaud,Sophia S. Wang,Melissa L. Bondy,Richard S. Houlston,Robert B. Jenkins,Margaret Wrensch,Meredith Yeager,Meredith Yeager,Anders Ahlbom,Demetrius Albanes,Ulrika Andersson,Laura E. Beane Freeman,Julie E. Buring,Mary Ann Butler,Melissa Z. Braganza,Tania Carreón,Maria Feychting,Sarah Fleming,Susan M. Gapstur,J. Michael Gaziano,J. Michael Gaziano,Graham G. Giles,Göran Hallmans,Roger Henriksson,Judith Hoffman-Bolton,Peter D. Inskip,Christoffer Johansen,Cari M. Kitahara,Mark Lathrop,Chenwei Liu,Loic Le Marchand,Martha S. Linet,Stefan Lonn,Stefan Lonn,Ulrike Peters,Ulrike Peters,Mark P. Purdue,Nathaniel Rothman,Avima M. Ruder,Marc Sanson,Howard D. Sesso,Gianluca Severi,Xiao-Ou Shu,Matthias Simon,Meir J. Stampfer,Meir J. Stampfer,Victoria L. Stevens,Kala Visvanathan,Emily White,Emily White,Alicja Wolk,Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte,Wei Zheng,Paul A. Decker,Victor Enciso-Mora,Brooke L. Fridley,Yu-Tang Gao,Matthew L. Kosel,Daniel H. Lachance,Ching C. Lau,Terri Rice,Anthony J. Swerdlow,Joseph L. Wiemels,John K. Wiencke,Sanjay Shete,Yong-Bing Xiang,Yuanyuan Xiao,Robert N. Hoover,Joseph F. Fraumeni,Nilanjan Chatterjee,Patricia Hartge,Stephen J. Chanock,Stephen J. Chanock +78 more
TL;DR: These findings suggest that larger studies focusing on novel approaches as well as specific tumor subtypes or subgroups will be required to identify additional common susceptibility loci for glioma risk, and that the 85 most promising single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers identified in this study were examined in three replication sets.
Journal ArticleDOI
Long non-coding RNAs in cancer progression
Keiko Tano,Nobuyoshi Akimitsu +1 more
TL;DR: A review of recent findings regarding the roles of lncRNAs in cancer biology highlights the importance of knowing the underlying molecular mechanisms by which these molecules regulate cancer development.
Journal ArticleDOI
DNA Methylation, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation, and Survival in Glioma
Brock C. Christensen,Ashley A. Smith,Shichun Zheng,Devin C. Koestler,E. Andres Houseman,E. Andres Houseman,Carmen J. Marsit,Joseph L. Wiemels,Heather H. Nelson,Margaret R. Karagas,Margaret Wrensch,Karl T. Kelsey,John K. Wiencke +12 more
TL;DR: The homogeneity of methylation classes for gliomas with IDH mutation, despite their histological diversity, suggests that IDh mutation is associated with a distinct DNA methylation phenotype and an altered metabolic profile in glioma.
Journal ArticleDOI
Germline mutations of regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1, RTEL1, in Dyskeratosis congenita.
Bari J. Ballew,Meredith Yeager,Kevin B. Jacobs,Neelam Giri,Joseph Boland,Laurie Burdett,Blanche P. Alter,Sharon A. Savage +7 more
TL;DR: Findings implicate a new telomere biology gene, RTEL1, in the etiology of DC, which includes cerebellar hypoplasia, severe immunodeficiency, enteropathy, and intrauterine growth retardation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Architecture of inherited susceptibility to common cancer
TL;DR: This Timeline article looks back at 40 years of research into the inherited genetic basis of cancer and the insights these studies have yielded, with a shift from models of predisposition based on single-gene causative mutations to multigenic models.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps
TL;DR: Haploview is a software package that provides computation of linkage disequilibrium statistics and population haplotype patterns from primary genotype data in a visually appealing and interactive interface.
Journal ArticleDOI
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Alkes L. Price,Alkes L. Price,Nick Patterson,Robert M. Plenge,Robert M. Plenge,Michael E. Weinblatt,Nancy A. Shadick,David Reich,David Reich +8 more
TL;DR: This work describes a method that enables explicit detection and correction of population stratification on a genome-wide scale and uses principal components analysis to explicitly model ancestry differences between cases and controls.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
Roger E. McLendon,Allan H. Friedman,Darrell D. Bigner,Erwin G. Van Meir,Daniel J. Brat,Gena M. Mastrogianakis,Jeffrey J. Olson,Tom Mikkelsen,Norman L. Lehman,Kenneth Aldape,W. K. Alfred Yung,Oliver Bogler,John N. Weinstein,Scott R. VandenBerg,Mitchel S. Berger,Michael D. Prados,Donna M. Muzny,Margaret Morgan,Steve Scherer,Aniko Sabo,Lynn Nazareth,Lora Lewis,Otis Hall,Yiming Zhu,Yanru Ren,Omar Alvi,Jiqiang Yao,Alicia Hawes,Shalini N. Jhangiani,Gerald R. Fowler,Anthony San Lucas,Christie Kovar,Andrew Cree,Huyen Dinh,Jireh Santibanez,Vandita Joshi,Manuel L. Gonzalez-Garay,Christopher A. Miller,Aleksandar Milosavljevic,Lawrence A. Donehower,David A. Wheeler,Richard A. Gibbs,Kristian Cibulskis,Carrie Sougnez,Timothy Fennell,Scott Mahan,Jane Wilkinson,Liuda Ziaugra,Robert C. Onofrio,Toby Bloom,Rob Nicol,Kristin G. Ardlie,Jennifer Baldwin,Stacey Gabriel,Eric S. Lander,Eric S. Lander,Li Ding,Robert S. Fulton,Michael D. McLellan,John W. Wallis,David E. Larson,Xiaoqi Shi,Rachel Abbott,Lucinda Fulton,Ken Chen,Daniel C. Koboldt,Michael C. Wendl,Rick Meyer,Yuzhu Tang,Ling Lin,John R. Osborne,Brian H. Dunford-Shore,Tracie L. Miner,Kim D. Delehaunty,Chris Markovic,Gary W. Swift,William Courtney,Craig Pohl,Scott Abbott,Amy Hawkins,Shin Leong,Carrie A. Haipek,Heather Schmidt,Maddy Wiechert,Tammi L. Vickery,Sacha Scott,David J. Dooling,Asif T. Chinwalla,George M. Weinstock,Elaine R. Mardis,Richard K. Wilson,Gad Getz,Wendy Winckler,Roel G.W. Verhaak,Michael S. Lawrence,Michael J. T. O’Kelly,James A. Robinson,Gabriele Alexe,Rameen Beroukhim,Scott L. Carter,Derek Y. Chiang,Josh Gould,Supriya Gupta,Josh Korn,Craig H. Mermel,Jill P. Mesirov,Stefano Monti,Huy V. Nguyen,Melissa Parkin,Michael R. Reich,Nicolas Stransky,Barbara A. Weir,Levi A. Garraway,Todd R. Golub,Matthew Meyerson,Lynda Chin,Alexei Protopopov,Jianhua Zhang,Ilana Perna,Sandy Aronson,Narayanan Sathiamoorthy,Georgia Ren,Jun Yao,W. Ruprecht Wiedemeyer,Hyun Soo Kim,Won Kong Sek,Yonghong Xiao,Isaac S. Kohane,Jon G. Seidman,Peter J. Park,Raju Kucherlapati,Peter W. Laird,Leslie Cope,James G. Herman,Daniel J. Weisenberger,Fei Pan,David Van Den Berg,Leander Van Neste,Mi Yi Joo,Kornel E. Schuebel,Stephen B. Baylin,Devin Absher,Jun Li,Audrey Southwick,Shannon T. Brady,Amita Aggarwal,Tisha Chung,Gavin Sherlock,James D. Brooks,Richard M. Myers,Paul T. Spellman,Elizabeth Purdom,Lakshmi Jakkula,Anna Lapuk,Henry Marr,Shannon Dorton,Gi Choi Yoon,Ju Han,Amrita Ray,Victoria Wang,Steffen Durinck,Mark D. Robinson,Nicholas J. Wang,Karen Vranizan,Vivian Peng,Eric Van Name,Gerald V. Fontenay,John Ngai,John G. Conboy,Bahram Parvin,Heidi S. Feiler,Terence P. Speed,Terence P. Speed,Joe W. Gray,Cameron Brennan,Nicholas D. Socci,Adam B. Olshen,Barry S. Taylor,Barry S. Taylor,Alex E. Lash,Nikolaus Schultz,Boris Reva,Yevgeniy Antipin,Alexey Stukalov,Benjamin Gross,Ethan Cerami,Qing Wang Wei,Li-Xuan Qin,Venkatraman E. Seshan,Liliana Villafania,Magali Cavatore,Laetitia Borsu,Agnes Viale,William L. Gerald,Chris Sander,Marc Ladanyi,Charles M. Perou,D. Neil Hayes,Michael D. Topal,Katherine A. Hoadley,Yuan Qi,Sai Balu,Yan Shi,Junyuan Wu,Robert Penny,Michael L. Bittner,Troy Shelton,Elizabeth Lenkiewicz,Scott Morris,Debbie Beasley,Sheri Sanders,Ari B. Kahn,Robert Sfeir,Jessica Chen,David Nassau,Larry Feng,Erin Hickey,Anna D. Barker,Daniela S. Gerhard,Joseph G. Vockley,Carolyn C. Compton,Jim Vaught,Peter Fielding,Martin L. Ferguson,Carl F. Schaefer,Jinghui Zhang,Subhashree Madhavan,Kenneth H. Buetow,Francis S. Collins,Peter J. Good,Mark S. Guyer,Brad Ozenberger,Jane Peterson,Elizabeth J. Thomson +233 more
TL;DR: The interim integrative analysis of DNA copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation aberrations in 206 glioblastomas reveals a link between MGMT promoter methylation and a hypermutator phenotype consequent to mismatch repair deficiency in treated gliobeasts, demonstrating that it can rapidly expand knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Population structure and eigenanalysis
TL;DR: An approach to studying population structure (principal components analysis) is discussed that was first applied to genetic data by Cavalli-Sforza and colleagues, and results from modern statistics are used to develop formal significance tests for population differentiation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Score Tests for Association between Traits and Haplotypes when Linkage Phase Is Ambiguous
TL;DR: New methods of testing the statistical association between haplotypes and a wide variety of traits, including binary, ordinal, and quantitative traits are developed, which allow adjustment for nongenetic covariates, which may be critical when analyzing genetically complex traits.
Related Papers (5)
Abstract B11: Replication of previously identified breast cancer susceptibility loci in a breast cancer case-control study on women of African ancestry
Yonglan Zheng,Dezheng Huo,Temidayo O. Ogundiran,Adeyinka G. Falusi,Oladosu Ojengbede,Clement Adebamowo,William J. Blot,Wei Zheng,Qiuyin Cai,Lisa B. Signorello,Katherine L. Nathanson,Susan M. Domchek,Timothy R. Rebbeck,Michael S. Simon,Anselm Hennis,Barbara Nemesure,Suh-Yuh Wu,M.C. Leske,Stefan Ambs,Abayomi Odetunde,Imaria Anetor,Stella Akinleye,Qun Niu,Jing Zhang,Anna Pluzhnikov,Anuar Konkashbaev,Lin Chen,Eric R. Gamazon,Younghee Lee,Nancy J. Cox,Olufunmilayo O. Olopade +30 more
Abstract LB-299: Genome wide association study of breast cancer in Latinas identifies protective variants of Indigenous American origin on 6q25
Laura Fejerman,Nasim Ahmadiyeh,Donglei Hu,Scott Huntsman,Kenneth B. Beckman,Jennifer L. Caswell,Esther M. John,Gabriela Torres-Mejía,Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona,Magdalena Echeverry,Anna Marie Tuazon,Carolina Ramirez,Christopher R. Gignoux,Celeste Eng,Esteban Gonzalez-Burchard,Brian E. Henderson,Loic Le Marchand,Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable,Christopher A. Haiman,Elad Ziv +19 more