scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Paris Descartes University

GovernmentParis, France
About: Paris Descartes University is a government organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Immune system. The organization has 20987 authors who have published 37456 publications receiving 1206222 citations. The organization is also known as: Université Paris V-Descartes & Université de Paris V.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An international consortium dedicated to large-scale data sharing and analytics across expert groups is formed, showing marked interconnectivity between six independent classification systems coalescing into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) with distinguishing features.
Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a frequently lethal disease with heterogeneous outcomes and drug responses. To resolve inconsistencies among the reported gene expression-based CRC classifications and facilitate clinical translation, we formed an international consortium dedicated to large-scale data sharing and analytics across expert groups. We show marked interconnectivity between six independent classification systems coalescing into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) with distinguishing features: CMS1 (microsatellite instability immune, 14%), hypermutated, microsatellite unstable and strong immune activation; CMS2 (canonical, 37%), epithelial, marked WNT and MYC signaling activation; CMS3 (metabolic, 13%), epithelial and evident metabolic dysregulation; and CMS4 (mesenchymal, 23%), prominent transforming growth factor-β activation, stromal invasion and angiogenesis. Samples with mixed features (13%) possibly represent a transition phenotype or intratumoral heterogeneity. We consider the CMS groups the most robust classification system currently available for CRC-with clear biological interpretability-and the basis for future clinical stratification and subtype-based targeted interventions.

3,351 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2018-Science
TL;DR: It is found that primary resistance to ICIs can be attributed to abnormal gut microbiome composition, and Antibiotics inhibited the clinical benefit of ICIs in patients with advanced cancer.
Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis induce sustained clinical responses in a sizable minority of cancer patients. We found that primary resistance to ICIs can be attributed to abnormal gut microbiome composition. Antibiotics inhibited the clinical benefit of ICIs in patients with advanced cancer. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from cancer patients who responded to ICIs into germ-free or antibiotic-treated mice ameliorated the antitumor effects of PD-1 blockade, whereas FMT from nonresponding patients failed to do so. Metagenomics of patient stool samples at diagnosis revealed correlations between clinical responses to ICIs and the relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila Oral supplementation with A. muciniphila after FMT with nonresponder feces restored the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in an interleukin-12-dependent manner by increasing the recruitment of CCR9+CXCR3+CD4+ T lymphocytes into mouse tumor beds.

3,258 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of this article is to define precisely both mediated moderation and moderated mediation and provide analytic strategies for assessing each.
Abstract: Procedures for examining whether treatment effects on an outcome are mediated and/or moderated have been well developed and are routinely applied. The mediation question focuses on the intervening mechanism that produces the treatment effect. The moderation question focuses on factors that affect the magnitude of the treatment effect. It is important to note that these two processes may be combined in informative ways, such that moderation is mediated or mediation is moderated. Although some prior literature has discussed these possibilities, their exact definitions and analytic procedures have not been completely articulated. The purpose of this article is to define precisely both mediated moderation and moderated mediation and provide analytic strategies for assessing each.

3,053 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results provide evidence that antihypertensive treatment with indapamide (sustained release), with or without perindopril, in persons 80 years of age or older is beneficial.
Abstract: A b s t r ac t Background Whether the treatment of patients with hypertension who are 80 years of age or older is beneficial is unclear. It has been suggested that antihypertensive therapy may reduce the risk of stroke, despite possibly increasing the risk of death. Methods We randomly assigned 3845 patients from Europe, China, Australasia, and Tunisia who were 80 years of age or older and had a sustained systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more to receive either the diuretic indapamide (sustained release, 1.5 mg) or matching placebo. The angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor perindopril (2 or 4 mg), or matching placebo, was added if necessary to achieve the target blood pressure of 150/80 mm Hg. The primary end point was fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results The active-treatment group (1933 patients) and the placebo group (1912 patients) were well matched (mean age, 83.6 years; mean blood pressure while sitting, 173.0/90.8 mm Hg); 11.8% had a history of cardiovascular disease. Median follow-up was 1.8 years. At 2 years, the mean blood pressure while sitting was 15.0/6.1 mm Hg lower in the active-treatment group than in the placebo group. In an intention-to- treat analysis, active treatment was associated with a 30% reduction in the rate of fatal or nonfatal stroke (95% confidence interval (CI), −1 to 51; P = 0.06), a 39% reduc- tion in the rate of death from stroke (95% CI, 1 to 62; P = 0.05), a 21% reduction in the rate of death from any cause (95% CI, 4 to 35; P = 0.02), a 23% reduction in the rate of death from cardiovascular causes (95% CI, −1 to 40; P = 0.06), and a 64% re- duction in the rate of heart failure (95% CI, 42 to 78; P<0.001). Fewer serious adverse events were reported in the active-treatment group (358, vs. 448 in the placebo group; P = 0.001). Conclusions The results provide evidence that antihypertensive treatment with indapamide (sus- tained release), with or without perindopril, in persons 80 years of age or older is beneficial. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00122811.)

2,723 citations


Authors

Showing all 21023 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Guido Kroemer2361404246571
Cyrus Cooper2041869206782
Jean-Laurent Casanova14484276173
Alain Fischer14377081680
Maxime Dougados134105469979
Carlos López-Otín12649483933
Giuseppe Viale12374072799
Thierry Poynard11966864548
Lorenzo Galluzzi11847771436
Shahrokh F. Shariat118163758900
Richard E. Tremblay11668545844
Olivier Hermine111102643779
Yehezkel Ben-Ari11045944293
Loïc Guillevin10880051085
Gérard Socié10792044186
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
174.2K papers, 8.3M citations

96% related

University of Paris
174.1K papers, 5M citations

92% related

Erasmus University Rotterdam
91.2K papers, 4.5M citations

91% related

Emory University
122.4K papers, 6M citations

90% related

Université de Montréal
100.4K papers, 4M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20238
202279
20211,083
20201,994
20193,298
20183,323