scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

FacilityBirmensdorf, Switzerland
About: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research is a facility organization based out in Birmensdorf, Switzerland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Climate change & Soil water. The organization has 1256 authors who have published 3222 publications receiving 161639 citations. The organization is also known as: WSL.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reanalyzed dia-positives of the original aerial photographs of 1959, -69, -80, -90 and -99 based on consistent photogrammetric processing.
Abstract: Storglaci¨ aren, located in the Kebnekaise massif in northern Sweden, has a long history of glaciological re- search. Early photo documentations date back to the late 19th century. Measurements of front position variations and distributed mass balance have been carried out since 1910 and 1945/46, respectively. In addition to these in-situ mea- surements, aerial photographs have been taken at decadal intervals since the beginning of the mass balance monitor- ing program and were used to produce topographic glacier maps. Inaccuracies in the maps were a challenge to early attempts to derive glacier volume changes and resulted in major differences when compared to the direct glaciological mass balances. In this study, we reanalyzed dia-positives of the original aerial photographs of 1959, -69, -80, -90 and -99 based on consistent photogrammetric processing. From the resulting digital elevation models and orthophotos, changes in length, area, and volume of Storglaci ¨ aren were computed

121 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These findings show that IADF characterization can provide information about the relationship between environmental factors and tree growth at the seasonal level and is a promising way for dating problematic wood samples and interpreting the phenomena that trigger the formation of IADFs in the Mediterranean environment.
Abstract: Woody species in Mediterranean ecosystems form intra-annual density fluctuations (IADFs) in tree rings in response to changes in environmental conditions, especially water availability. Dendrochronology, quantitative wood anatomy and high-resolution isotopic analysis (using a laser ablation technique) were used to characterize IADFs in Arbutus unedo shrubs grown on two sites with different water availability on the island of Elba (Italy). Our findings show that IADF characterization can provide information about the relationship between environmental factors and tree growth at the seasonal level. At the more xeric site, IADFs mainly located in the early and middle parts of the annual ring, showed a decrease in vessel size and an increase in δ(13) C as a result of drought deficit. Opposite trends were found at the more mesic site, with IADFs located at the end of the ring and associated with a lower δ(13) C. Moreover, at the first site, IADFs are induced by drought deficit, while at the second site IADFs are linked with the regrowth in the last part of the growing season triggered by favourable wet conditions. This combined approach is a promising way for dating problematic wood samples and interpreting the phenomena that trigger the formation of IADFs in the Mediterranean environment.

121 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Sphagnum mosses collected from a herbarium and collected recently from a peat bog surface, were used to assess the isotopic character of past and recent atmospheric Pb deposition in Switzerland and to constrain possible Pb sources as mentioned in this paper.

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Tamsin L. Edwards1, Sophie Nowicki2, Sophie Nowicki3, Ben Marzeion4, Regine Hock5, Regine Hock6, Heiko Goelzer7, Heiko Goelzer8, Heiko Goelzer9, Helene Seroussi10, Nicolas C. Jourdain11, Donald Slater12, Donald Slater13, Donald Slater14, Fiona Turner1, Christopher J. Smith15, Christopher J. Smith16, Christine M. McKenna16, Erika Simon3, Ayako Abe-Ouchi17, Jonathan M. Gregory18, Jonathan M. Gregory19, Eric Larour10, William H. Lipscomb20, Antony J. Payne21, Andrew Shepherd16, Cécile Agosta22, Patrick Alexander23, Patrick Alexander24, Torsten Albrecht25, Brian Anderson26, Xylar Asay-Davis27, Andy Aschwanden6, Alice Barthel27, Andrew Bliss28, Reinhard Calov25, Christopher Chambers29, Nicolas Champollion4, Nicolas Champollion11, Youngmin Choi10, Youngmin Choi30, Richard I. Cullather3, J. K. Cuzzone10, Christophe Dumas22, Denis Felikson31, Denis Felikson3, Xavier Fettweis32, Koji Fujita33, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi34, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi35, Rupert Gladstone36, Nicholas R. Golledge26, Ralf Greve29, Tore Hattermann37, Tore Hattermann38, Matthew J. Hoffman27, Angelika Humbert39, Angelika Humbert4, Matthias Huss40, Matthias Huss41, Matthias Huss42, Philippe Huybrechts43, Walter W. Immerzeel9, Thomas Kleiner39, Philip Kraaijenbrink9, Sébastien Le clec'h43, Victoria Lee21, Gunter R. Leguy20, Christopher M. Little, Daniel P. Lowry44, Jan Hendrik Malles4, Daniel F. Martin45, Fabien Maussion46, Mathieu Morlighem30, James F. O’Neill1, Isabel Nias3, Isabel Nias47, Frank Pattyn7, Tyler Pelle30, Stephen Price27, Aurélien Quiquet22, Valentina Radić48, Ronja Reese25, David R. Rounce49, David R. Rounce6, Martin Rückamp39, Akiko Sakai33, Courtney Shafer45, Nicole Schlegel10, Sarah Shannon21, Robin S. Smith18, Fiammetta Straneo13, Sainan Sun7, Lev Tarasov50, Luke D. Trusel51, Jonas Van Breedam43, Roderik S. W. van de Wal9, Michiel R. van den Broeke9, Ricarda Winkelmann52, Ricarda Winkelmann25, Harry Zekollari, Cheng Zhao35, Tong Zhang27, Tong Zhang53, Thomas Zwinger54 
King's College London1, University at Buffalo2, Goddard Space Flight Center3, University of Bremen4, University of Oslo5, University of Alaska Fairbanks6, Université libre de Bruxelles7, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research8, Utrecht University9, California Institute of Technology10, University of Grenoble11, University of Edinburgh12, University of California, San Diego13, University of St Andrews14, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis15, University of Leeds16, University of Tokyo17, University of Reading18, Met Office19, National Center for Atmospheric Research20, University of Bristol21, Université Paris-Saclay22, Goddard Institute for Space Studies23, Columbia University24, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research25, Victoria University of Wellington26, Los Alamos National Laboratory27, Colorado State University28, Hokkaido University29, University of California, Irvine30, Universities Space Research Association31, University of Liège32, Nagoya University33, Australian Antarctic Division34, University of Tasmania35, University of Lapland36, Norwegian Polar Institute37, University of Tromsø38, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research39, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research40, ETH Zurich41, University of Fribourg42, Vrije Universiteit Brussel43, GNS Science44, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory45, University of Innsbruck46, University of Liverpool47, University of British Columbia48, Carnegie Mellon University49, Memorial University of Newfoundland50, Pennsylvania State University51, University of Potsdam52, Beijing Normal University53, CSC – IT Center for Science54
06 May 2021-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models, and find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges.
Abstract: The land ice contribution to global mean sea level rise has not yet been predicted1 using ice sheet and glacier models for the latest set of socio-economic scenarios, nor using coordinated exploration of uncertainties arising from the various computer models involved. Two recent international projects generated a large suite of projections using multiple models2,3,4,5,6,7,8, but primarily used previous-generation scenarios9 and climate models10, and could not fully explore known uncertainties. Here we estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios11,12 using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models. We find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges. The median decreases from 25 to 13 centimetres sea level equivalent (SLE) by 2100, with glaciers responsible for half the sea level contribution. The projected Antarctic contribution does not show a clear response to the emissions scenario, owing to uncertainties in the competing processes of increasing ice loss and snowfall accumulation in a warming climate. However, under risk-averse (pessimistic) assumptions, Antarctic ice loss could be five times higher, increasing the median land ice contribution to 42 centimetres SLE under current policies and pledges, with the 95th percentile projection exceeding half a metre even under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming. This would severely limit the possibility of mitigating future coastal flooding. Given this large range (between 13 centimetres SLE using the main projections under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming and 42 centimetres SLE using risk-averse projections under current pledges), adaptation planning for twenty-first-century sea level rise must account for a factor-of-three uncertainty in the land ice contribution until climate policies and the Antarctic response are further constrained.

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A framework to facilitate comparisons between broad-scale plot-based classification approaches, based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach).
Abstract: Aims: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose-specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad-scale plot-based classification approaches. -- Results: Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad-scale classification approaches. -- Conclusions: Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot-based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.

120 citations


Authors

Showing all 1333 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Peter H. Verburg10746434254
Bernhard Schmid10346046419
Christian Körner10337639637
André S. H. Prévôt9051138599
Fortunat Joos8727636951
Niklaus E. Zimmermann8027739364
Robert Huber7831125131
David Frank7818618624
Jan Esper7525419280
James W. Kirchner7323821958
David B. Roy7025026241
Emmanuel Frossard6835615281
Derek Eamus6728517317
Benjamin Poulter6625522519
Ulf Büntgen6531615876
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
United States Forest Service
21.8K papers, 959.1K citations

90% related

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
35.2K papers, 1.4M citations

89% related

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
9.8K papers, 394.3K citations

88% related

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
5K papers, 367K citations

87% related

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
7.2K papers, 449.5K citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023111
2022173
2021395
2020327
2019269
2018281