Institution
University of Groningen
Education•Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands•
About: University of Groningen is a education organization based out in Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 36346 authors who have published 69116 publications receiving 2940370 citations. The organization is also known as: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen & RUG.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Vanderbilt University1, University of Southern California2, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center3, University of Wisconsin-Madison4, University of California, Los Angeles5, National Center for Genome Resources6, Portland VA Medical Center7, University of Colorado Boulder8, University of Pennsylvania9, Hannover Medical School10, Johns Hopkins University11, Oregon Health & Science University12, Cornell University13, University of Michigan14, University of Tennessee Health Science Center15, Washington University in St. Louis16, University of Toronto17, University of Memphis18, Medical Research Council19, University of Massachusetts Medical School20, Hebrew University of Jerusalem21, Université de Montréal22, Purdue University23, University of California, Davis24, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic25, University at Buffalo26, Emory University27, University of Cincinnati28, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center29, New York University30, University of Groningen31, Rutgers University32, Stanford University33, Max Planck Society34, National Institutes of Health35, University of Alabama at Birmingham36, International Livestock Research Institute37, Heidelberg University38, Medical College of Wisconsin39, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai40, Oak Ridge National Laboratory41, Charité42, University of Antwerp43, RWTH Aachen University44, Paul Sabatier University45, University of California, San Francisco46, McGill University47, Pasteur Institute48, University of Western Australia49, Yale University50, University of Oxford51, Case Western Reserve University52, Roswell Park Cancer Institute53, University of Kentucky54, University of Helsinki55, University of Nebraska–Lincoln56, Harvard University57, Merck & Co.58, King's College London59, Northwestern University60, Shriners Hospitals for Children61, Thomas Jefferson University62, Novartis63, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill64, Southern Illinois University Carbondale65, University of Rochester66
TL;DR: The Collaborative Cross will provide a common reference panel specifically designed for the integrative analysis of complex systems and will change the way the authors approach human health and disease.
Abstract: The goal of the Complex Trait Consortium is to promote the development of resources that can be used to understand, treat and ultimately prevent pervasive human diseases. Existing and proposed mouse resources that are optimized to study the actions of isolated genetic loci on a fixed background are less effective for studying intact polygenic networks and interactions among genes, environments, pathogens and other factors. The Collaborative Cross will provide a common reference panel specifically designed for the integrative analysis of complex systems and will change the way we approach human health and disease.
1,040 citations
TL;DR: A conceptual framework is presented showing that Hawks, due to inefficient management of mediators of allostasis, are more likely to be violent, to develop impulse control disorders, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, sudden death, atypical depression, chronic fatigue states and inflammation.
1,034 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce goal-framing theory, which postulates that goals "frame" the way people process information and act upon it, and three goal frames are distinguished: a hedonic, gain, and normative goal frame.
Abstract: This article discusses new developments about goal-dependent framing and multiple goal frames (sometimes also called “multiple motives”), which are highly relevant for understanding environmental behavior. We introduce goal-framing theory, which postulates that goals “frame” the way people process information and act upon it. Three goal frames are distinguished: a hedonic, gain, and normative goal frame. In general, multiple goals are active at any given time, which may (or may not) be compatible; that is, the strength of the focal goal may be influenced by other goals that are in the background. Based on an extensive review of studies in environmental psychology, we suggest those conditions under which each goal frame may be dominant in influencing environmental behavior. In the environmental context, normative goal frames imply acting pro-environmentally, while gain and hedonic goal frames often result in not acting in an environmentally sound manner. Next, we argue that pro-environmental behavior may be promoted by strengthening normative goals or by making gain and hedonic goals less incompatible with normative goals. Finally, based on goal-framing theory, we suggest questions to be addressed in future research.
1,025 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the electron-hole pair created via photon absorption in organic photoconversion systems must overcome the Coulomb attraction to achieve long-range charge separation, and this process is facilitated through the formation of excited, delocalized band states.
Abstract: The electron-hole pair created via photon absorption in organic photoconversion systems must overcome the Coulomb attraction to achieve long-range charge separation. We show that this process is facilitated through the formation of excited, delocalized band states. In our experiments on organic photovoltaic cells, these states were accessed for a short time (
1,023 citations
Hampton University1, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility2, University of Paris-Sud3, University of Santiago, Chile4, Brookhaven National Laboratory5, University of Pavia6, University of Groningen7, Federico Santa María Technical University8, Shandong University9, Goethe University Frankfurt10, Stony Brook University11, Baruch College12, Duke University13, Argonne National Laboratory14, The Catholic University of America15, Old Dominion University16, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory17, Ohio State University18, University of Zagreb19, University of Jyväskylä20, Tel Aviv University21, CERN22, Temple University23, Massachusetts Institute of Technology24, Columbia University25, Ruhr University Bochum26, California Institute of Technology27, University of Massachusetts Amherst28, University of Buenos Aires29, University of the Basque Country30, University of Connecticut31, University of Tübingen32, Pennsylvania State University33, Stanford University34, Dalhousie University35, Central China Normal University36
TL;DR: In this article, the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community, is presented.
Abstract: This White Paper presents the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community. It was commissioned by the managements of Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) with the objective of presenting a summary of scientific opportunities and goals of the EIC as a follow-up to the 2007 NSAC Long Range plan. This document is a culmination of a community-wide effort in nuclear science following a series of workshops on EIC physics over the past decades and, in particular, the focused ten-week program on “Gluons and quark sea at high energies” at the Institute for Nuclear Theory in Fall 2010. It contains a brief description of a few golden physics measurements along with accelerator and detector concepts required to achieve them. It has been benefited profoundly from inputs by the users’ communities of BNL and JLab. This White Paper offers the promise to propel the QCD science program in the US, established with the CEBAF accelerator at JLab and the RHIC collider at BNL, to the next QCD frontier.
1,022 citations
Authors
Showing all 36692 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald C. Kessler | 274 | 1332 | 328983 |
| Nicholas J. Wareham | 212 | 1657 | 204896 |
| André G. Uitterlinden | 199 | 1229 | 156747 |
| Lei Jiang | 170 | 2244 | 135205 |
| Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
| Richard H. Friend | 169 | 1182 | 140032 |
| Panos Deloukas | 162 | 410 | 154018 |
| Jerome I. Rotter | 156 | 1071 | 116296 |
| Christopher M. Dobson | 150 | 1008 | 105475 |
| Dirk Inzé | 149 | 647 | 74468 |
| Scott T. Weiss | 147 | 1025 | 74742 |
| Dieter Lutz | 139 | 671 | 67414 |
| Wilmar B. Schaufeli | 137 | 513 | 95718 |
| Cisca Wijmenga | 136 | 668 | 86572 |
| Arnold B. Bakker | 135 | 506 | 103778 |