scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Hong Kong Baptist University

EducationHong Kong, China
About: Hong Kong Baptist University is a education organization based out in Hong Kong, China. It is known for research contribution in the topics: China & Population. The organization has 7811 authors who have published 18919 publications receiving 555274 citations. The organization is also known as: Hong Kong Baptist College & HKBU.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduced a new perspective on the role of corruption in economic growth and provided quantitative estimates of the impact of corruption on the growth and importance of the transmission channels.

1,289 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article reviewed and synthesized recent research from strategy, finance, and economics on principal-principal conflicts with an emphasis on their institutional antecedents and organizational consequences, and provided a foundation upon which future research can continue to build.
Abstract: Instead of traditional principal–agent conflicts espoused in most research dealing with developed economies, principal–principal conflicts have been identified as a major concern of corporate governance in emerging economies. Principal–principal conflicts between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders result from concentrated ownership, extensive family ownership and control, business group structures, and weak legal protection of minority shareholders. Such principal–principal conflicts alter the dynamics of the corporate governance process and, in turn, require remedies different from those that deal with principal–agent conflicts. This article reviews and synthesizes recent research from strategy, finance, and economics on principal–principal conflicts with an emphasis on their institutional antecedents and organizational consequences. The resulting integration provides a foundation upon which future research can continue to build.

1,280 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Deanne N. Den Hartog1, Robert J. House2, Paul J. Hanges3, S. Antonio Ruiz-Quintanilla4, Peter W. Dorfman5, Ikhlas A. Abdalla6, Babajide Samuel Adetoun, Ram N. Aditya7, Hafid Agourram8, Adebowale Akande, Bolanle Elizabeth Akande, Staffan Åkerblom9, Carlos Altschul10, Eden Alvarez-Backus, Julian Andrews11, Maria Eugenia Arias, Mirian Sofyan Arif12, Neal M. Ashkanasy13, Arben Asllani14, Guiseppe Audia15, Gyula Bakacsi, Helena Bendova, David Beveridge16, Rabi S. Bhagat17, Alejandro Blacutt, Jiming Bao18, Domenico Bodega, Muzaffer Bodur19, Simon Booth20, Annie E. Booysen21, Dimitrios Bourantas22, Klas Brenk, Felix C. Brodbeck23, Dale Everton Carl24, Philippe Castel25, Chieh Chen Chang26, Sandy Chau, Frenda K.K. Cheung27, Jagdeep S. Chhokar28, Jimmy Chiu29, Peter Cosgriff30, Ali Dastmalchian31, Jose Augusto Dela Coleta, Marilia Ferreira Dela Coleta, Marc Deneire, Markus Dickson32, Gemma Donnelly-Cox33, Christopher P. Earley34, Mahmoud A. Elgamal35, Miriam Erez36, Sarah Falkus13, Mark Fearing30, Richard H. G. Field11, Carol Fimmen16, Michael Frese37, Ping Ping Fu38, Barbara Gorsler39, Mikhail V. Gratchev, Vipin Gupta40, Celia Gutiérrez41, Frans Marti Hartanto, Markus Hauser, Ingalill Holmberg9, Marina Holzer, Michael Hoppe, Jon P. Howell5, Elena Ibrieva42, John Ickis43, Zakaria Ismail44, Slawomir Jarmuz45, Mansour Javidan24, Jorge Correia Jesuino, Li Ji46, Kuen Yung Jone, Geoffrey Jones20, Revaz Jorbenadse47, Hayat Kabasakal19, Mary A. Keating33, Andrea Keller39, Jeffrey C. Kennedy30, Jay S. Kim48, Giorgi Kipiani, Matthias Kipping20, Edvard Konrad, Paul L. Koopman1, Fuh Yeong Kuan, Alexandre Kurc, Marie-Françoise Lacassagne25, Sang M. Lee42, Christopher Leeds, Francisco Leguizamón43, Martin Lindell, Jean Lobell, Fred Luthans42, Jerzy Maczynski49, Norma Binti Mansor, Gillian Martin33, Michael Martin42, Sandra Martinez5, Aly Messallam50, Cecilia McMillen51, Emiko Misumi, Jyuji Misumi, Moudi Al-Homoud35, Phyllisis M. Ngin52, Jeremiah O’Connell53, Enrique Ogliastri54, Nancy Papalexandris22, T. K. Peng55, Maria Marta Preziosa, José Prieto41, Boris Rakitsky, Gerhard Reber56, Nikolai Rogovsky57, Joydeep Roy-Bhattacharya, Amir Rozen36, Argio Sabadin, Majhoub Sahaba, Colombia Salon De Bustamante54, Carmen Santana-Melgoza58, Daniel A. Sauers30, Jette Schramm-Nielsen59, Majken Schultz59, Zuqi Shi18, Camilla Sigfrids, Kye Chung Song60, Erna Szabo56, Albert C. Y. Teo61, Henk Thierry62, Jann Hidayat Tjakranegara, Sylvana Trimi42, Anne S. Tsui63, Pavakanum Ubolwanna64, Marius W. Van Wyk21, Marie Vondrysova65, Jürgen Weibler66, Celeste P.M. Wilderom62, Rongxian Wu67, Rolf Wunderer68, Nik Rahiman Nik Yakob44, Yongkang Yang18, Zuoqiu Yin18, Michio Yoshida69, Jian Zhou18 
VU University Amsterdam1, University of Pennsylvania2, University of Maryland, Baltimore3, Cornell University4, New Mexico State University5, Qatar Airways6, Louisiana Tech University7, Université du Québec8, Stockholm School of Economics9, University of Buenos Aires10, University of Alberta11, University of Indonesia12, University of Queensland13, Bellevue University14, London Business School15, Western Illinois University16, University of Memphis17, Fudan University18, Boğaziçi University19, University of Reading20, University of South Africa21, Athens University of Economics and Business22, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich23, University of Calgary24, University of Burgundy25, National Sun Yat-sen University26, Hong Kong Polytechnic University27, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad28, City University of Hong Kong29, Lincoln University (New Zealand)30, University of Lethbridge31, Wayne State University32, University College Dublin33, Indiana University34, Kuwait University35, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology36, University of Giessen37, The Chinese University of Hong Kong38, University of Zurich39, Fordham University40, Complutense University of Madrid41, University of Nebraska–Lincoln42, INCAE Business School43, National University of Malaysia44, Opole University45, Hong Kong Baptist University46, Tbilisi State University47, Ohio State University48, University of Wrocław49, Alexandria University50, University of San Francisco51, Melbourne Business School52, Bentley University53, University of Los Andes54, I-Shou University55, Johannes Kepler University of Linz56, International Labour Organization57, Smith College58, Copenhagen Business School59, Chungnam National University60, National University of Singapore61, Tilburg University62, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology63, Thammasat University64, Sewanee: The University of the South65, FernUniversität Hagen66, Soochow University (Suzhou)67, University of St. Gallen68, Kumamoto University69
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on culturally endorsed implicit theories of leadership (CLTs) and show that attributes associated with charismatic/transformational leadership will be universally endorsed as contributing to outstanding leadership.
Abstract: This study focuses on culturally endorsed implicit theories of leadership (CLTs). Although cross-cultural research emphasizes that different cultural groups likely have different conceptions of what leadership should entail, a controversial position is argued here: namely that attributes associated with charismatic/transformational leadership will be universally endorsed as contributing to outstanding leadership. This hypothesis was tested in 62 cultures as part of the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) Research Program. Universally endorsed leader attributes, as well as attributes that are universally seen as impediments to outstanding leadership and culturally contingent attributes are presented here. The results support the hypothesis that specific aspects of charismatic/transformational leadership are strongly and universally endorsed across cultures.

1,227 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is confirmed that a social network and shared goals significantly contributed to a person's volition to share knowledge, and directly contributed to the perceived social pressure of the organization.

1,218 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2012
TL;DR: This study conducted a systematic review of eWOM research and identified key factors related to the major elements of the social communication literature and built an integrative framework explaining the impact of e WOM communication on consumer behavior.
Abstract: The notion of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) communication has received considerable attention in both business and academic communities. Numerous studies have been conducted to examine the effectiveness of eWOM communication. The scope of published studies on the impact of eWOM communication is large and fragmented and little effort has been made to integrate the findings of prior studies and evaluate the status of the research in this area. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of eWOM research. Building upon our literature analysis, we used the social communication framework to summarize and classify prior eWOM studies. We further identified key factors related to the major elements of the social communication literature and built an integrative framework explaining the impact of eWOM communication on consumer behavior. We believe that the framework will provide an important foundation for future eWOM research work.

1,132 citations


Authors

Showing all 7946 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Weihong Tan14089267151
Bin Liu138218187085
Jun Lu135152699767
John P. Giesy114116262790
Qiang Yang112111771540
Ming Hung Wong10371039738
Wei Wang95354459660
Jianhua Zhang9241528085
Xiaojun Wu91108831687
Guibin Jiang8885034633
Shu Tao8763927304
Paul K.S. Lam8748525614
Cheng-Yong Su8758132322
Hai-Long Jiang8619830946
Baowen Li8347723080
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Hong Kong
99.1K papers, 3.2M citations

92% related

National University of Singapore
165.4K papers, 5.4M citations

92% related

Nanyang Technological University
112.8K papers, 3.2M citations

92% related

The Chinese University of Hong Kong
93.6K papers, 3M citations

91% related

Zhejiang University
183.2K papers, 3.4M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202346
2022246
20211,655
20201,479
20191,244
20181,093