Institution
University of Dundee
Education•Dundee, United Kingdom•
About: University of Dundee is a education organization based out in Dundee, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Protein kinase A. The organization has 19258 authors who have published 39640 publications receiving 1919433 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitas Dundensis & Dundee University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The mechanism by which PKB is activated and the downstream actions of this multifunctional kinase are reviewed, as well as the evidence that PDK1 may be involved in the activation of protein kinases other than PKB, and the possibility that some of the currently postulated PKB substrates targets might in fact be phosphorylated byPDK1-regulated kinasesother than P KB.
Abstract: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) generate specific inositol lipids that have been implicated in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, survival, differentiation and cytoskeletal changes One of the best characterized targets of PI3K lipid products is the protein kinase Akt or protein kinase B (PKB) In quiescent cells, PKB resides in the cytosol in a low-activity conformation Upon cellular stimulation, PKB is activated through recruitment to cellular membranes by PI3K lipid products and phosphorylation by 3'-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1) Here we review the mechanism by which PKB is activated and the downstream actions of this multifunctional kinase We also discuss the evidence that PDK1 may be involved in the activation of protein kinases other than PKB, the mechanisms by which this activity of PDK1 could be regulated and the possibility that some of the currently postulated PKB substrates targets might in fact be phosphorylated by PDK1-regulated kinases other than PKB
1,663 citations
••
University of Minnesota1, University of Colorado Boulder2, VU University Amsterdam3, Harvard University4, University of Southern California5, University of Queensland6, University of Tartu7, Erasmus University Rotterdam8, Hospital for Special Surgery9, Statens Serum Institut10, University of Copenhagen11, Broad Institute12, University of Essex13, University of Edinburgh14, University of Cambridge15, University Hospital of Lausanne16, Geisinger Health System17, Wenzhou Medical College18, Stanford University19, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill20, University of Wisconsin-Madison21, Hofstra University22, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research23, University of Dundee24, University of Toronto25, Princeton University26, National Bureau of Economic Research27, Queen's University28, New York University Shanghai29, Karolinska Institutet30, Uppsala University31, University of Lausanne32, New York University33, Stockholm School of Economics34
TL;DR: A joint (multi-phenotype) analysis of educational attainment and three related cognitive phenotypes generates polygenic scores that explain 11–13% of the variance ineducational attainment and 7–10% ofthe variance in cognitive performance, which substantially increases the utility ofpolygenic scores as tools in research.
Abstract: Here we conducted a large-scale genetic association analysis of educational attainment in a sample of approximately 1.1 million individuals and identify 1,271 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs. For the SNPs taken together, we found evidence of heterogeneous effects across environments. The SNPs implicate genes involved in brain-development processes and neuron-to-neuron communication. In a separate analysis of the X chromosome, we identify 10 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs and estimate a SNP heritability of around 0.3% in both men and women, consistent with partial dosage compensation. A joint (multi-phenotype) analysis of educational attainment and three related cognitive phenotypes generates polygenic scores that explain 11-13% of the variance in educational attainment and 7-10% of the variance in cognitive performance. This prediction accuracy substantially increases the utility of polygenic scores as tools in research.
1,658 citations
••
TL;DR: The postulated functions of the recently discovered CD33-related Siglecs are discussed and the factors that seem to be driving their rapid evolution are considered.
Abstract: Through binding ubiquitous sialic-acid residues on cell surfaces, the Siglec family of lectins promote cell–cell interactions and regulate the functions of numerous immune-cell types. This Review describes the emerging roles of Siglecs in pathogen recognition and endocytosis.
1,648 citations
••
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, George Washington University2, J. Craig Venter Institute3, University of Glasgow4, University of Oxford5, Newcastle University6, University of Bordeaux7, University of Cambridge8, Oregon Health & Science University9, University of Dundee10, Imperial College London11, Case Western Reserve University12, Yale University13, Université catholique de Louvain14, University of Iowa15, Wellcome Trust16
TL;DR: Comparisons of the cytoskeleton and endocytic trafficking systems of Trypanosoma brucei with those of humans and other eukaryotic organisms reveal major differences.
Abstract: African trypanosomes cause human sleeping sickness and livestock trypanosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa. We present the sequence and analysis of the 11 megabase-sized chromosomes of Trypanosoma brucei. The 26-megabase genome contains 9068 predicted genes, including ∼900 pseudogenes and ∼1700 T. brucei–specific genes. Large subtelomeric arrays contain an archive of 806 variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) genes used by the parasite to evade the mammalian immune system. Most VSG genes are pseudogenes, which may be used to generate expressed mosaic genes by ectopic recombination. Comparisons of the cytoskeleton and endocytic trafficking systems with those of humans and other eukaryotic organisms reveal major differences. A comparison of metabolic pathways encoded by the genomes of T. brucei, T. cruzi, and Leishmania major reveals the least overall metabolic capability in T. brucei and the greatest in L. major. Horizontal transfer of genes of bacterial origin has contributed to some of the metabolic differences in these parasites, and a number of novel potential drug targets have been identified.
1,631 citations
••
Heidelberg University1, University of Marburg2, Queen Mary University of London3, University of Leeds4, Rutgers University5, University of New South Wales6, University of Münster7, Aarhus University8, Columbia University9, University of Chieti-Pescara10, Norwegian University of Science and Technology11, Karolinska Institutet12, Université catholique de Louvain13, University of Sydney14, University of Western Australia15, University of Dundee16, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven17, Maastricht University18, National Yang-Ming University19
TL;DR: The IASP Task Force, which comprises pain experts from across the globe, has developed a new and pragmatic classification of chronic pain for the upcoming 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, termed “multiple parenting.”
Abstract: Chronic pain has been recognized as pain that persists past normal healing time5 and hence lacks the acute warning function of physiological nociception.35 Usually pain is regarded as chronic when it lasts or recurs for more than 3 to 6 months.29 Chronic pain is a frequent condition, affecting an estimated 20% of people worldwide6,13,14,18 and accounting for 15% to 20% of physician visits.25,28 Chronic pain should receive greater attention as a global health priority because adequate pain treatment is a human right, and it is the duty of any health care system to provide it.4,13
The current version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) of the World Health Organization (WHO) includes some diagnostic codes for chronic pain conditions, but these diagnoses do not reflect the actual epidemiology of chronic pain, nor are they categorized in a systematic manner. The ICD is the preeminent tool for coding diagnoses and documenting investigations or therapeutic measures within the health care systems of many countries. In addition, ICD codes are commonly used to report target diseases and comorbidities of participants in clinical research. Consequently, the current lack of adequate coding in the ICD makes the acquisition of accurate epidemiological data related to chronic pain difficult, prevents adequate billing for health care expenses related to pain treatment, and hinders the development and implementation of new therapies.10,11,16,23,27,31,37
Responding to these shortcomings, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) contacted the WHO and established a Task Force for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP Task Force, which comprises pain experts from across the globe,19 has developed a new and pragmatic classification of chronic pain for the upcoming 11th revision of the ICD. The goal is to create a classification system that is applicable in primary care and in clinical settings for specialized pain management.
A major challenge in this process was finding a rational principle of classification that suits the different types of chronic pain and fits into the general ICD-11 framework. Pain categories are variably defined based on the perceived location (headache), etiology (cancer pain), or the primarily affected anatomical system (neuropathic pain). Some diagnoses of pain defy these classification principles (fibromyalgia).
This problem is not unique to the classification of pain, but exists throughout the ICD. The IASP Task Force decided to give first priority to pain etiology, followed by underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and finally the body site. Developing this multilayered classification was greatly facilitated by a novel principle of assigning diagnostic codes in ICD-11, termed “multiple parenting.” Multiple parenting allows the same diagnosis to be subsumed under more than 1 category (for a glossary of ICD terms refer to Table Table1).1). Each diagnosis retains 1 category as primary parent, but is cross-referenced to other categories that function as secondary parents.
Table 1
Glossary of ICD-11 terms.
The new ICD category for “Chronic Pain” comprises the most common clinically relevant disorders. These disorders were divided into 7 groups (Fig. (Fig.1):1): (1) chronic primary pain, (2) chronic cancer pain, (3) chronic posttraumatic and postsurgical pain, (4) chronic neuropathic pain, (5) chronic headache and orofacial pain, (6) chronic visceral pain, and (7) chronic musculoskeletal pain. Experts assigned to each group are responsible for the definition of diagnostic criteria and the selection of the diagnoses to be included under these subcategories of chronic pain. Thanks to Bedirhan Ustun and Robert Jakob of the WHO, these pain diagnoses are now integrated in the beta version of ICD-11 (http://id.who.int/icd/entity/1581976053). The Task Force is generating content models for single entities to describe their clinical characteristics. After peer review overseen by the WHO Steering Committee,39 the classification of chronic pain will be voted into action by the World Health Assembly in 2017.
Figure 1
Organizational chart of Task Force, IASP, and WHO interactions. The IASP Task Force was created by the IASP council and its scope defined in direct consultation of the chairs (R.D.T. and W.R.) with WHO representatives in 2012. The Task Force reports to ...
2. Classification of chronic pain
Chronic pain was defined as persistent or recurrent pain lasting longer than 3 months. This definition according to pain duration has the advantage that it is clear and operationalized.
Optional specifiers for each diagnosis record evidence of psychosocial factors and the severity of the pain. Pain severity can be graded based on pain intensity, pain-related distress, and functional impairment.
2.1. Chronic primary pain
Chronic primary pain is pain in 1 or more anatomic regions that persists or recurs for longer than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or significant functional disability (interference with activities of daily life and participation in social roles) and that cannot be better explained by another chronic pain condition. This is a new phenomenological definition, created because the etiology is unknown for many forms of chronic pain. Common conditions such as, eg, back pain that is neither identified as musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain, chronic widespread pain, fibromyalgia, and irritable bowel syndrome will be found in this section and biological findings contributing to the pain problem may or may not be present. The term “primary pain” was chosen in close liaison with the ICD-11 revision committee, who felt this was the most widely acceptable term, in particular, from a nonspecialist perspective.
1,627 citations
Authors
Showing all 19404 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Matthias Mann | 221 | 887 | 230213 |
Mark I. McCarthy | 200 | 1028 | 187898 |
Stefan Schreiber | 178 | 1233 | 138528 |
Kenneth C. Anderson | 178 | 1138 | 126072 |
Masayuki Yamamoto | 171 | 1576 | 123028 |
Salvador Moncada | 164 | 495 | 138030 |
Jorge E. Cortes | 163 | 2784 | 124154 |
Andrew P. McMahon | 162 | 415 | 90650 |
Philip Cohen | 154 | 555 | 110856 |
Dirk Inzé | 149 | 647 | 74468 |
Andrew T. Hattersley | 146 | 768 | 106949 |
Antonio Lanzavecchia | 145 | 408 | 100065 |
Kim Nasmyth | 142 | 294 | 59231 |
David Price | 138 | 1687 | 93535 |
Dario R. Alessi | 136 | 354 | 74753 |