scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Vermont

EducationBurlington, Vermont, United States
About: University of Vermont is a education organization based out in Burlington, Vermont, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 17592 authors who have published 38251 publications receiving 1609874 citations. The organization is also known as: UVM & University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is reported here that temperature-sensitive mutants defective in genes CDC42 and CDC43, like cdc24 mutants, fail to bud but continue growth at restrictive temperature, and thus arrest as large unbudded cells, supporting the hypothesis that the events associated with budding and those of the nuclear cycle represent two independent pathways within the cell cycle.
Abstract: Budding in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a polarized deposition of new cell surface material that is associated with a highly asymmetric disposition of the actin cytoskeleton. Mutants defective in gene CDC24, which are unable to bud or establish cell polarity, have been of great interest with regard to both the mechanisms of cellular morphogenesis and the mechanisms that coordinate cell-cycle events. To gain further insights into these problems, we sought additional mutants with defects in budding. We report here that temperature-sensitive mutants defective in genes CDC42 and CDC43, like cdc24 mutants, fail to bud but continue growth at restrictive temperature, and thus arrest as large unbudded cells. Nearly all of the arrested cells appear to begin nuclear cycles (as judged by the occurrence of DNA replication and the formation and elongation of mitotic spindles), and many go on to complete nuclear division, supporting the hypothesis that the events associated with budding and those of the nuclear cycle represent two independent pathways within the cell cycle. The arrested mutant cells display delocalized cell-surface deposition associated with a loss of asymmetry of the actin cytoskeleton. CDC42 maps distal to the rDNA on chromosome XII and CDC43 maps near lys5 on chromosome VII.

588 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Nov 2008-JAMA
TL;DR: In this study, G. biloba at 120 mg twice a day was not effective in reducing either the overall incidence rate of dementia or AD incidence in elderly individuals with normal cognition or those with mild cognitive impairment.
Abstract: Context Ginkgo biloba is widely used for its potential effects on memory and cognition. To date, adequately powered clinical trials testing the effect of G biloba on dementia incidence are lacking. Objective To determine effectiveness of G biloba vs placebo in reducing the incidence of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD) in elderly individuals with normal cognition and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in 5 academic medical centers in the United States between 2000 and 2008 with a median follow-up of 6.1 years. Three thousand sixty-nine community volunteers aged 75 years or older with normal cognition (n = 2587) or MCI (n = 482) at study entry were assessed every 6 months for incident dementia. Intervention Twice-daily dose of 120-mg extract of G biloba (n = 1545) or placebo (n = 1524). Main Outcome Measures Incident dementia and AD determined by expert panel consensus. Results Five hundred twenty-three individuals developed dementia (246 receiving placebo and 277 receiving G biloba) with 92% of the dementia cases classified as possible or probable AD, or AD with evidence of vascular disease of the brain. Rates of dropout and loss to follow-up were low (6.3%), and the adverse effect profiles were similar for both groups. The overall dementia rate was 3.3 per 100 person-years in participants assigned to G biloba and 2.9 per 100 person-years in the placebo group. The hazard ratio (HR) for G biloba compared with placebo for all-cause dementia was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.33; P = .21) and for AD, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.97-1.39; P = .11). G biloba also had no effect on the rate of progression to dementia in participants with MCI (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.50; P = .39). Conclusions In this study, G biloba at 120 mg twice a day was not effective in reducing either the overall incidence rate of dementia or AD incidence in elderly individuals with normal cognition or those with MCI. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00010803

583 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
G. Eiriksdottir1, T. B. Harris1, L. J. Launer, Vilmundur Gudnason1, Aaron R. Folsom1, Gavin Andrews2, C. M. Ballantyne3, Nilesh J. Samani4, A. S. Hall5, P. S. Braund6, A. J. Balmforth1, Peter H. Whincup4, Richard W Morris1, Debbie A Lawlor3, Gordon D.O. Lowe2, Nicholas J. Timpson7, Shah Ebrahim7, Yoav Ben-Shlomo7, George Davey-Smith5, Børge G. Nordestgaard6, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen1, Jeppe Zacho8, Matthew A. Brown9, Manjinder S. Sandhu1, Sally L. Ricketts1, Sofie Ashford1, Leslie A. Lange, Alexander P. Reiner10, Mary Cushman11, Russel Tracy11, C. Wu, J. Ge, Y. Zou, A. Sun, Joseph Hung, Brendan McQuillan, Peter L. Thompson12, John Beilby13, Nicole M. Warrington, Lyle J. Palmer14, Christoph Wanner15, Christiane Drechsler15, Michael Hoffmann16, F. G. R. Fowkes17, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Meena Kumari2, Michelle A. Miller18, Michael Marmot2, Charlotte Onland-Moret, Y. T. van der Schouw19, J.M.A. Boer20, Cisca Wijmenga, Kay-Tee Khaw, Ramachandran S. Vasan21, Renate B. Schnabel22, J. F. Yamamoto, E J Benjamin21, Heribert Schunkert23, Jeanette Erdmann23, Inke R. König23, Christian Hengstenberg24, Benedetta D. Chiodini25, MariaGrazia Franzosi26, Silvia Pietri, Francesca Gori26, Megan E. Rudock27, Yongmei Liu27, Kurt Lohman27, Steve E. Humphries2, Anders Hamsten28, Paul Norman29, Graeme J. Hankey, Konrad Jamrozik, Eric B. Rimm30, J. K. Pai, Bruce M. Psaty31, Susan R. Heckbert31, J. C. Bis10, Salim Yusuf32, Sonia S. Anand3, Engert Jc3, C. Xie, Ryan L. Collins, Robert Clarke33, David L.H. Bennett34, Jaspal S. Kooner35, John C. Chambers35, Paul Elliott35, W. März36, Marcus E. Kleber, Bernhard O. Böhm37, Winkelmann Br38, Olle Melander39, Göran Berglund39, Wolfgang Koenig37, Barbara Thorand40, Jens Baumert41, Annette Peters42, JoAnn E. Manson30, J.A. Cooper2, P.J. Talmud, Per Ladenvall, Lovisa Johansson39, J. H. Jansson43, Göran Hallmans43, Muredach P. Reilly44, Liming Qu44, Man Li45, Daniel J. Rader44, Hugh Watkins33, Jemma C. Hopewell46, Danish Saleheen1, John Danesh1, Philippe M. Frossard47, Naveed Sattar34, Michele Robertson48, J. Shepherd34, Ernst J. Schaefer49, A. Hofman50, J. C. M. Witteman51, Isabella Kardys51, Abbas Dehghan10, U de Faire52, Anna M. Bennet28, Bruna Gigante28, Karin Leander28, Bas J M Peters19, A.H. Maitland-van der Zee19, A.H. De Boer53, Olaf H. Klungel19, Philip Greenland54, J. Dai, Simin Liu55, Eric J. Brunner2, Mika Kivimäki2, Denis St. J. O’Reilly56, Ian Ford48, Chris J. Packard57 
University of Cambridge1, University College London2, McGill University3, University of Leicester4, University of Bristol5, University of Copenhagen6, University of London7, Copenhagen University Hospital8, University of Queensland9, University of Washington10, University of Vermont11, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital12, University of Western Australia13, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research14, University of Würzburg15, ETH Zurich16, University of Edinburgh17, University of Warwick18, Utrecht University19, National Heart Foundation of Australia20, Boston University21, University of Kiel22, University of Lübeck23, University Hospital Regensburg24, King's College London25, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research26, Wake Forest University27, Karolinska Institutet28, University of Leeds29, Harvard University30, Group Health Cooperative31, McMaster University32, University of Oxford33, University of Glasgow34, Imperial College London35, Medical University of Graz36, University of Ulm37, Goethe University Frankfurt38, Lund University39, Helmholtz Zentrum München40, Robert Koch Institute41, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich42, Umeå University43, University of Pennsylvania44, Johns Hopkins University45, Clinical Trial Service Unit46, Aga Khan University Hospital47, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics48, Tufts University49, University of Bonn50, Erasmus University Rotterdam51, Karolinska University Hospital52, University of Groningen53, Northwestern University54, University of California, Los Angeles55, Glasgow Royal Infirmary56, Glasgow Clinical Research Facility57
15 Feb 2011
TL;DR: Human genetic data indicate that C reactive protein concentration itself is unlikely to be even a modest causal factor in coronary heart disease.
Abstract: Objective To use genetic variants as unconfounded proxies of C reactive protein concentration to study its causal role in coronary heart disease. Design Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis of ind ...

583 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall, approximately 1 in every 1300 screening mammography examinations leads to a diagnosis of DCIS, and the clinical significance of screen-detected DCIS needs further investigation.
Abstract: Background: With the large number of women having mammography—an estimated 28.4 million U.S. women aged 40 years and older in 1998—the percentage of cancers detected as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which has an uncertain prognosis, has increased. We pooled data from seven regional mammography registries to determine the percentage of mammographically detected cancers that are DCIS and the rate of DCIS per 1000 mammograms. Methods: We analyzed data on 653 833 mammograms from 540 738 women between 40 and 84 years of age who underwent screening mammography at facilities participating in the National Cancer Institute’s Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) throughout 1996 and 1997. Mammography results were linked to population-based cancer and pathology registries. We calculated the percentage of screen-detected breast cancers that were DCIS, the rate of screen-detected DCIS per 1000 mammograms by age and by previous mammography status, and the sensitivity of screening mammography. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 3266 cases of breast cancer were identified, 591 DCIS and 2675 invasive breast cancer. The percentage of screendetected breast cancers that were DCIS decreased with age (from 28.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23.9% to 32.5%] for women aged 40–49 years to 16.0% [95% CI = 13.3% to 18.7%] for women aged 70–84 years). However, the rate of screen-detected DCIS cases per 1000 mammograms increased with age (from 0.56 [95% CI = 0.41 to 0.70] for women aged 40–49 years to 1.07 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.27] for women aged 70–84 years). Sensitivity of screening mammography in all age groups combined was higher for detecting DCIS (86.0% [95% CI = 83.2% to 88.8%]) than it was for detecting invasive breast cancer (75.1% [95% CI = 73.5% to 76.8%]). Conclusions: Overall, approximately 1 in every 1300 screening mammography examinations leads to a diagnosis of DCIS. Given uncertainty about the natural history of DCIS, the clinical significance of screen-detected DCIS needs further investigation. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94: 1546–54]

581 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preliminary experimental results show that the third criterion is a potential discriminative subspace selection method, which significantly reduces the class separation problem in comparing with the linear dimensionality reduction step in FLDA and its several representative extensions.
Abstract: Subspace selection approaches are powerful tools in pattern classification and data visualization. One of the most important subspace approaches is the linear dimensionality reduction step in the Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA), which has been successfully employed in many fields such as biometrics, bioinformatics, and multimedia information management. However, the linear dimensionality reduction step in FLDA has a critical drawback: for a classification task with c classes, if the dimension of the projected subspace is strictly lower than c - 1, the projection to a subspace tends to merge those classes, which are close together in the original feature space. If separate classes are sampled from Gaussian distributions, all with identical covariance matrices, then the linear dimensionality reduction step in FLDA maximizes the mean value of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergences between different classes. Based on this viewpoint, the geometric mean for subspace selection is studied in this paper. Three criteria are analyzed: 1) maximization of the geometric mean of the KL divergences, 2) maximization of the geometric mean of the normalized KL divergences, and 3) the combination of 1 and 2. Preliminary experimental results based on synthetic data, UCI Machine Learning Repository, and handwriting digits show that the third criterion is a potential discriminative subspace selection method, which significantly reduces the class separation problem in comparing with the linear dimensionality reduction step in FLDA and its several representative extensions.

581 citations


Authors

Showing all 17727 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Ralph B. D'Agostino2261287229636
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
Valentin Fuster1791462185164
Dennis J. Selkoe177607145825
Anders Björklund16576984268
Alfred L. Goldberg15647488296
Christopher P. Cannon1511118108906
Debbie A Lawlor1471114101123
Roger J. Davis147498103478
Andrew S. Levey144600156845
Jonathan G. Seidman13756389782
Yu Huang136149289209
Christine E. Seidman13451967895
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

96% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202359
2022177
20211,841
20201,762
20191,653
20181,569