scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In conclusion, the DCP resulted in improved LBP outcomes compared to treatment-as-usual and has potential to scale personalized evidence-based non-invasive treatment for LBP patients.
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability throughout the world and is economically burdensome. The recommended first line treatment for non-specific LBP is non-invasive care. A digital care program (DCP) delivering evidence-based non-invasive treatment for LBP can aid self-management by engaging patients and scales personalized therapy for patient-specific needs. We assessed the efficacy of a 12-week DCP for LBP in a two-armed, pre-registered, randomized, controlled trial (RCT). Participants were included based on self-reported duration of LBP, but those with surgery or injury to the lower back in the previous three months were excluded. The treatment group (DCP) received the 12-week DCP, consisting of sensor-guided exercise therapy, education, cognitive behavioral therapy, team and individual behavioral coaching, activity tracking, and symptom tracking – all administered remotely via an app. The control group received three digital education articles only. All participants maintained access to treatment-as-usual. At 12 weeks, an intention-to-treat analysis showed each primary outcome—Oswestry Disability Index (p < 0.001), Korff Pain (p < 0.001) and Korff Disability (p < 0.001)—as well as each secondary outcome improved more for participants in the DCP group compared to control group. For participants who completed the DCP (per protocol), average improvement in pain outcomes ranged 52-64% (Korff: 48.8–23.4, VAS: 43.6–16.5, VAS impact on daily life: 37.3–13.4; p < 0.01 for all) and average improvement in disability outcomes ranged 31–55% (Korff: 33.1–15, ODI: 19.7–13.5; p < 0.01 for both). Surgical interest significantly reduced in the DCP group. Participants that completed the DCP had an average engagement, each week, of 90%. Future studies will further explore the effectiveness of the DCP for long-term outcomes beyond 12 weeks and for a LBP patient population with possibly greater baseline pain and disability. In conclusion, the DCP resulted in improved LBP outcomes compared to treatment-as-usual and has potential to scale personalized evidence-based non-invasive treatment for LBP patients.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions

TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive survey of the most important aspects of DL and including those enhancements recently added to the field is provided, and the challenges and suggested solutions to help researchers understand the existing research gaps.
Journal ArticleDOI

Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency.

TL;DR: This whitepaper reports on key issues associated with MI specific to applications in the healthcare field, identifies areas of improvement for MI systems in the context of healthcare, and proposes avenues and solutions for these issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions-A call for innovative evidence generation approaches.

TL;DR: This article reviews current research approaches and discusses their limitations; discusses challenges faced by different stakeholders in undertaking evaluations; and calls for new approaches to facilitate the safe and responsible growth of the digital health sector.
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-invasive decision support for NSCLC treatment using PET/CT radiomics.

TL;DR: A 18F-FDG-PET/CT-based deep learning model is reported, which demonstrates high accuracy in EGFR mutation status prediction across patient cohorts from different institutions, which is promising to identify NSCLC patients sensitive to EGFR-TKI or ICI-treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers' perspectives.

TL;DR: Examining the perceived benefits and risks of AI medical devices with clinical decision support (CDS) features from consumers’ perspectives sheds more light on factors affecting perceived risks and proposes some recommendations on how to practically reduce these concerns.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

TL;DR: In this article, a model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed-and random-effects terms, and the formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profeatured REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of model parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

Theo Vos, +778 more
- 16 Sep 2017 - 
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) for 328 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Oswestry Disability Index.

TL;DR: The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure, and the process of using the ODI is reviewed and should be the subject of further research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain

TL;DR: Because the validity and reliability of some of the existing data are uncertain, caution is needed in an assessment of the information on this type of pain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians

TL;DR: Clinicians should only consider opioids as an option in patients who have failed the aforementioned treatments and only if the potential benefits outweigh the risks for individual patients and after a discussion of known risks and realistic benefits with patients.
Related Papers (5)