scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Residential green spaces and mortality: A systematic review.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This review supports the hypothesis that living in areas with higher amounts of green spaces reduces mortality, mainly CVD, and suggests that cohort studies with more and better covariate data, improved green space assessment and accounting for socioeconomic status are needed to provide further and more complete evidence.
About
This article is published in Environment International.The article was published on 2016-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 501 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance.

TL;DR: In this article, potential pathways linking greenspace to health are presented in three domains, which emphasize three general functions of greenspace: reducing harm (e.g., reducing exposure to air pollution, noise and heat), restoring capacities (i.e., attention restoration and physiological stress recovery), and encouraging physical activity and facilitating social cohesion). Interrelations between among the three domains are also noted.
Journal ArticleDOI

The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes

TL;DR: Greenspace exposure is associated with wide ranging health benefits across 143 included studies, and meta‐analysis showed statistically significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure, salivary cortisol and heart rate.
Journal ArticleDOI

The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future.

Marina Romanello, +92 more
- 30 Oct 2021 - 
TL;DR: The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change : code red for a healthy future as mentioned in this paper, is the most recent publication of the Countdown on Health and Climate Change, 2019.
Journal ArticleDOI

Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews

TL;DR: The results show that there is strong evidence for improved affect as well as on heat reduction from urban natural environments, and guidelines on how public health and well-being could be integrated into implementation of NBS for resilient and liveable urban landscapes and health in a changing climate are provided.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Mohsen Naghavi, +731 more
- 10 Jan 2015 - 
TL;DR: In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013) as discussed by the authors, the authors used the GBD 2010 methods with some refinements to improve accuracy applied to an updated database of vital registration, survey, and census data.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review" ?

In this paper, a systematic review of the evidence of an association between residential natural outdoor environments, particularly green and blue spaces ( e.g. lakes, rivers, beaches, etc. ), and mortality in adults was presented. 

In this sense, further studies are needed. But further studies are needed to confirm the results of the current meta-analysis in different locations with different climate, urban and socio-economic characteristics and also to understand the impacts of such exposure increases in each area of study. However, studies included in the 23 present review and that did adjust for air pollution still found beneficial effects of green spaces ( see Supplemental material, Table A for further information on the variables included in the models ). 

For instance, if physical activity is the mechanism explaining the reduced mortality associated to green spaces then possibly large green spaces are needed. 

Certain environmental factors in urban settings, such as air pollution, noise and extreme high temperatures have been associated with increased mortality (Selander et al. 

studies have observed that people living near or having access to natural outdoor environments are more likely to be physically active and have better mental health and therefore to be healthier (Shanahan et al. 

in those studies where the effect estimate was calculated for each unit increase of the exposure, the authors calculated the exposure value that corresponded to a 10% of increment with respect to the median of the exposure and calculated the new effect estimate. 

The authors also evaluated the influence of each study by conducting sensitivity analyses excluding studies one by one from the main meta-analysis and fitting the meta-analyses for the12   rest of studies. 

These mechanisms include: a) intrinsic qualities of natural outdoor environments that enhance health or well-being (restoration theory) and that have an effect through simple viewing or observing natural outdoor spaces (Shanahan et al. 2015; Wolf and Robbins 2015), b) the healthy environment associated with green spaces (increasing biodiversity which influences immune response and less temperature, air pollutants and noise have been observed in greener areas) (Gidlöf-Gunnarsson and Öhrström 2007; Selander et al. 

Evidence from their review supports the hypothesis that living in areas with higher amounts of green spaces reduces mortality, particularly CVD mortality. 

Evaluation of exposure to green spaces was quite heterogeneous between studies, although in all of them exposure was based on a single point in time measurement (and not the average of measurements of several years, for instance); the most used approach was the calculation of the percentage of green space based on land-cover maps (Mitchell and Popham 2008; Richardson and Mitchell 2010; Richardson et al.