scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Paul Scherrer Institute

FacilityVilligen, Switzerland
About: Paul Scherrer Institute is a facility organization based out in Villigen, Switzerland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Neutron & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 9248 authors who have published 23984 publications receiving 890129 citations. The organization is also known as: PSI.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Weiglein1, Sami Lehti2, Geneviève Bélanger, Tao Han3, David L. Rainwater4, Massimiliano Chiorboli5, Michael Ratz, M. Schumacher6, P. Niezurawski7, Stefano Moretti8, Filip Moortgat9, S. J. Asztalos10, Rohini M. Godbole11, Abdelhak Djouadi12, G. Polesello9, Werner Porod13, Werner Porod14, A.A. Giolo-Nicollerat15, Alessia Tricomi5, J.L. Hewett16, M. Szleper17, L. Zivkovic18, Stephen Godfrey19, Maria Krawczyk7, Klaus Desch20, Alexander Sherstnev21, Dimitri Bourilkov22, A. G. Akeroyd, Dirk Zerwas, M. Muhlleitner23, T. Binoth24, Maria Spiropulu9, Alexander Nikitenko25, A. Krokhotine, V. Bunichev21, Tadas Krupovnickas26, Peter Wienemann, T. Hurth16, T. Hurth9, A. De Roeck9, S. De Curtis27, Ritva Kinnunen2, D. Grellscheid28, U. Baur29, J. Kalinowski7, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick1, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick9, H. U. Martyn30, Alexander Pukhov21, C. Hugonie13, U. Ellwanger, Daniel Tovey31, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki7, Thomas G. Rizzo16, S. Slabospitsky, Jonathan L. Feng32, Remi Lafaye33, Sally Dawson34, Diaz23, Philip Bechtle20, I.F. Ginzburg, Hooman Davoudiasl, Andreas Redelbach24, J. Jiang35, W. J. Stirling1, Reinhold Rückl24, Per Osland36, S. Weinzierl37, Fernando Quevedo38, Laura Reina26, Timothy Barklow16, H. J. Schreiber, Andre Sopczak39, Wilfried Buchmuller, Howard E. Haber40, H. Pas24, E. Lytken41, Xerxes Tata, Howard Baer26, Tsutomu T. Yanagida42, Sabine Kraml9, Sabine Kraml43, Mayda Velasco17, Francois Richard, E. K. U. Gross6, A.F. Osorio44, J. Guasch23, Fawzi Boudjema, Stewart Boogert45, Sven Heinemeyer9, Sabine Riemann, D. Asner18, Daniele Dominici27, Victoria Jane Martin46, J.F. Gunion47, Marco Battaglia48, Michael Spira23, Doreen Wackeroth29, David J. Miller49, David J. Miller46, Joan Sola50, J. Gronberg10, Zack Sullivan, A. Juste, Lynne H. Orr4, Wolfgang Hollik51, Heather E. Logan3, Benjamin C. Allanach38, Junji Hisano42, Carlos E. M. Wagner52, Carlos E. M. Wagner35, Frank F. Deppisch24, Tilman Plehn9, F. Gianotti9, Gianluca Cerminara53, G.A. Blair54, Wolfgang Kilian, Michael Dittmar15, E. E. Boos21, Kiyotomo Kawagoe55, Alexander Belyaev26, Koichi Hamaguchi, Børge Kile Gjelsten56, Tim M. P. Tait, Klaus Mönig, Edmond L. Berger35, P.M. Zerwas, Mihoko M. Nojiri57 
Durham University1, University of Helsinki2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, University of Rochester4, University of Catania5, Weizmann Institute of Science6, University of Warsaw7, University of Southampton8, CERN9, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory10, Indian Institute of Science11, University of Montpellier12, Spanish National Research Council13, University of Zurich14, ETH Zurich15, Stanford University16, Northwestern University17, University of Pittsburgh18, Carleton University19, University of Hamburg20, Moscow State University21, University of Florida22, Paul Scherrer Institute23, University of Würzburg24, Imperial College London25, Florida State University26, University of Florence27, University of Bonn28, University at Buffalo29, RWTH Aachen University30, University of Sheffield31, University of California, Irvine32, Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de physique des particules33, Brookhaven National Laboratory34, Argonne National Laboratory35, University of Bergen36, University of Mainz37, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services38, Lancaster University39, University of California, Santa Cruz40, University of Copenhagen41, University of Tokyo42, Austrian Academy of Sciences43, University of Manchester44, University College London45, University of Edinburgh46, University of California, Davis47, University of California, Berkeley48, University of Glasgow49, University of Barcelona50, Max Planck Society51, University of Chicago52, University of Turin53, Royal Holloway, University of London54, Kobe University55, University of Oslo56, Kyoto University57
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the possible interplay between the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e(+)e(-) Linear Collider (ILC) in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics.

422 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper will demonstrate the performance of the latest TENDL releases for different application fields, as well as new approaches for uncertainty quantification based on Bayesian inference methods and possible differential and integral adjustments.

422 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a global fit to all available b → sl+l− data (l = e, μ) was performed in a model-independent way allowing for different patterns of New Physics.
Abstract: In the Standard Model (SM), the rare transitions where a bottom quark decays into a strange quark and a pair of light leptons exhibit a potential sensitivity to physics beyond the SM. In addition, the SM embeds Lepton Flavour Universality (LFU), leading to almost identical probabilities for muon and electron modes. The LHCb collaboration discovered a set of deviations from the SM expectations in decays to muons and also in ratios assessing LFU. Other experiments (Belle, ATLAS, CMS) found consistent measurements, albeit with large error bars. We perform a global fit to all available b → sl+l− data (l = e, μ) in a model-independent way allowing for different patterns of New Physics. For the first time, the NP hypothesis is preferred over the SM by 5 σ in a general case when NP can enter SM-like operators and their chirally-flipped partners. LFU violation is favoured with respect to LFU at the 3-4 σ level. We discuss the impact of LFU-violating New Physics on the observable P 5 ′ from B → K∗μ+μ− and we compare our estimate for long-distance charm contributions with an empirical model recently proposed by a group of LHCb experimentalists. Finally, we discuss NP models able to describe this consistent pattern of deviations.

421 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The electronic structure of nanocrystalline Si which shows visible photoluminescence is calculated using the density-functional approach for finite structures, and results for clusters suggest that the band gap scales linearly with L, where L is the cluster diameter.
Abstract: The electronic structure of nanocrystalline Si which shows visible photoluminescence is calculated using the density-functional approach for finite structures. Except for geometry this is the same theory as for first-principles band structures of semiconductors and other solids. Our results for clusters ranging up to 706 Si atoms suggest that the band gap scales linearly with ${\mathit{L}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$, where L is the cluster diameter. For such clusters it is found that dipole transitions across the gap are symmetry allowed. The finite structures thus show a direct band gap which is considerably larger than the one of bulk silicon. For larger clusters we find a strong decrease of oscillator strength, consistent with the occurrence of the indirect gap in the bulk limit.

421 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Knowing the geometrical limits of ECM binding sites required for cell attachment and spreading is essential for an understanding of cell adhesion and migration, and for the design of artificial surfaces that optimally interact with cells in a living tissue.
Abstract: Cell adhesion, spreading and migration require the dynamic formation and dispersal of contacts with the extracellular matrix (ECM). In vivo, the number, availability and distribution of ECM binding sites dictate the shape of a cell and determine its mobility. To analyse the geometrical limits of ECM binding sites required for cell attachment and spreading, we used microcontact printing to produce regular patterns of ECM protein dots of defined size separated by nonadhesive regions. Cells cultured on these substrata adhere to and spread on ECM regions as small as 0.1 microm2, when spacing between dots is less than 5 microm. Spacing of 5-25 microm induces a cell to adapt its shape to the ECM pattern. The ability to spread and migrate on dots > or =1 microm2 ceases when the dot separation is > or =30 microm. The extent of cell spreading is directly correlated to the total substratum coverage with ECM-proteins, but irrespective of the geometrical pattern. An optimal spreading extent is reached at a surface coating above 15%. Knowledge of these geometrical limits is essential for an understanding of cell adhesion and migration, and for the design of artificial surfaces that optimally interact with cells in a living tissue.

421 citations


Authors

Showing all 9348 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrea Bocci1722402176461
Tobin J. Marks1591621111604
Wolfgang Wagner1562342123391
David D'Enterria1501592116210
Andreas Pfeiffer1491756131080
Christoph Grab1441359144174
Maurizio Pierini1431782104406
Alexander Belyaev1421895100796
Ajit Kumar Mohanty141112493062
Felicitas Pauss1411623104493
Chiara Mariotti141142698157
Luc Pape1411441130253
Rainer Wallny1411661105387
Roland Horisberger1391471100458
Emmanuelle Perez138155099016
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Los Alamos National Laboratory
74.6K papers, 2.9M citations

93% related

Argonne National Laboratory
64.3K papers, 2.4M citations

93% related

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
66.5K papers, 4.1M citations

93% related

Oak Ridge National Laboratory
73.7K papers, 2.6M citations

93% related

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202363
2022199
20211,299
20201,442
20191,330
20181,298