scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of California

EducationOakland, California, United States
About: University of California is a education organization based out in Oakland, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Layer (electronics). The organization has 55175 authors who have published 52933 publications receiving 1491169 citations. The organization is also known as: UC & University of California System.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Omalizumab 300 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks reduced weekly ISS and other symptom scores versus placebo in CIU/CSU patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with approved doses of H1 antihistamines.

317 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In situ Measurements of Particles And CME Transients (IMPACT) as discussed by the authors was designed and developed to provide multipoint solar wind and suprathermal electron, interplanetary magnetic field, and solar energetic particle information required to unravel the nature of coronal mass ejections and their heliospheric consequences.
Abstract: The IMPACT (In situ Measurements of Particles And CME Transients) investigation on the STEREO mission was designed and developed to provide multipoint solar wind and suprathermal electron, interplanetary magnetic field, and solar energetic particle information required to unravel the nature of coronal mass ejections and their heliospheric consequences. IMPACT consists of seven individual sensors which are packaged into a boom suite, and a SEP suite. This review summarizes the science objectives of IMPACT, the instruments that comprise the IMPACT investigation, the accommodation of IMPACT on the STEREO twin spacecraft, and the overall data products that will flow from the IMPACT measurements. Accompanying papers in this volume of Space Science Reviews highlight the individual sensor technical details and capabilities, STEREO project plans for the use of IMPACT data, and modeling activities for IMPACT (and other STEREO) data interpretation.

317 citations

22 Sep 2005
TL;DR: Kagan et al. as mentioned in this paper conducted a study of 14 pulp and paper manufacturing plants in Australia, New Zealand, British Columbia, and the states of Washington and Georgia in the United States.
Abstract: Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter? Robert A. Kagan Dorothy Thornton Neil Gunningham How and to what extent does regulation matter in shaping corporate behavior? How important is it compared to other incentives and mechanisms of social control, and how does it interact with those mechanisms? How might we explain variation in corporate responses to law and other external pressures? This article addresses these questions through an study of environmental performance in 14 pulp and paper manufacturing mills in Australia, New Zealand, British Columbia, and the states of Washington and Georgia in the United States. Over the last three decades, we find tightening regulatory requirements and intensifying political pressures have brought about large improvements and considerable convergence in environmental performance by pulp manufacturers, most of which have gone ‘‘beyond compliance’’ in several ways. But regulation does not account for remaining differences in environmental performance across facilities. Rather, ‘‘social license’’ pressures (particularly from local communities and environmental activists) and corporate environmental management style prod some firms toward better performance compliance than others. At the same time, economic pressures impose limits on ‘‘beyond performance’’ investments. In producing large gains in environmental performance, however, regulation still matters greatly, but less as a system of hierarchically imposed, uniformly enforced rules than as a coordinative mechanism, routinely interacting with market pressures, local and national environmental activists, and the culture of corporate management in generating environmental improvement while narrowing the spread between corporate leaders and laggards. I. Introduction I n what ways and to what extent does regulation matter in shaping corporate behavior? How important is it compared to The authors are grateful to scores of pulp mill managers, regulatory officials, industry consultants, and environmental activistsFall of whom must remain anonymousFfor their cooperation and insight. David Sonnenfeld, Kathryn Harrison, Peter May, and anonymous reviewers all gave us valuable advice on earlier drafts. Biyi Abesina provided valuable research assistance. The Center for the Study of Law and Society, University of California, Berkeley, provided space, administrative assistance, and social support for the research project that led to this article, and the Smith Richardson Foundation funded our research. Please direct correspondence to Robert A. Kagan, Center for the Study of Law & Society, University of California, 2240 Piedmont Ave., Berkeley, CA 94720; tel: (510) 642-4038; email: rak@uclink4.berkeley.edu. Law & Society Review, Volume 37, Number 1 (2003) r 2003 by The Law and Society Association. All rights reserved.

317 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a systematic procedure for constructing semidiscrete, second order accurate, variation diminishing, five-point band width, approximations to scalar conservation laws is presented.
Abstract: A systematic procedure for constructing semidiscrete, second order accurate, variation diminishing, five-point band width, approximations to scalar conservation laws, is presented. These schemes are constructed to also satisfy a single discrete entropy inequality. Thus, in the convex flux case, we prove convergence to the unique physically correct solution. For hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, we formally use this construction to extend the first author’s first order accurate scheme, and show (under some minor technical hypotheses) that limit solutions satisfy an entropy inequality. Results concerning discrete shocks, a maximum principle, and maximal order of accuracy are obtained. Numerical applications are also presented.

317 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the "Drag-Based Model" (DBM) of heliospheric propagation of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) based on the hypothesis that the driving Lorentz force, which launches a CME, ceases in the upper corona and that beyond a certain distance the dynamics becomes governed by the interaction of the ICME and the ambient solar wind.
Abstract: We present the “Drag-Based Model” (DBM) of heliospheric propagation of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). The DBM is based on the hypothesis that the driving Lorentz force, which launches a CME, ceases in the upper corona and that beyond a certain distance the dynamics becomes governed solely by the interaction of the ICME and the ambient solar wind. In particular, we consider the option where the drag acceleration has a quadratic dependence on the ICME relative speed, which is expected in a collisionless environment, where the drag is caused primarily by emission of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves. In this paper we present the simplest version of DBM, where the equation of motion can be solved analytically, providing explicit solutions for the Sun–Earth ICME transit time and impact speed. This offers easy handling and straightforward application to real-time space-weather forecasting. Beside presenting the model itself, we perform an analysis of DBM performances, applying a statistical and case-study approach, which provides insight into the advantages and drawbacks of DBM. Finally, we present a public, DBM-based, online forecast tool.

316 citations


Authors

Showing all 55232 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
George M. Whitesides2401739269833
Michael Karin236704226485
Fred H. Gage216967185732
Rob Knight2011061253207
Martin White1962038232387
Simon D. M. White189795231645
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Peidong Yang183562144351
Patrick O. Brown183755200985
Michael G. Rosenfeld178504107707
George M. Church172900120514
David Haussler172488224960
Yang Yang1712644153049
Alan J. Heeger171913147492
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

95% related

University of California, Berkeley
265.6K papers, 16.8M citations

94% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

94% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

94% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202322
2022105
2021775
20201,069
20191,225
20181,684