scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Aalto University

EducationEspoo, Finland
About: Aalto University is a education organization based out in Espoo, Finland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Computer science & Context (language use). The organization has 9969 authors who have published 32648 publications receiving 829626 citations. The organization is also known as: TKK & Aalto-korkeakoulu.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the most relevant studies of the ORR on heteroatom-doped nanocarbons and transition metal-nitrogen-carbon (M-N-C) type catalysts in alkaline media are presented.
Abstract: Over the last decade, great progress has been made in the development of non-precious metal catalysts for the electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Among these, heteroatom-doped carbon nanomaterials and transition metal–nitrogen–carbon (M–N–C) catalysts are especially advantageous in an alkaline environment, showing high electrocatalytic activity for the ORR and good durability. Over the past few years, substantial achievements have also been made in improving the performance of anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) and the commercialisation of these devices has emerged as a viable option. This review article provides an outline to the most relevant studies of the ORR on heteroatom-doped nanocarbons and M–N–C type catalysts in alkaline media. In addition, an overview of the studies employing these materials as cathodes in AEMFCs is presented. A separate section is devoted to the results obtained with alkaline direct methanol and ethanol fuel cells. Further perspectives in the field of AEMFC research and development are also highlighted.

332 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent progress in advanced nanostructures synthesized from biomass resources for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is reviewed and the resulting electrocatalytic activity and durability are introduced and compared to those from conventional Pt/C-based Electrocatalysts.
Abstract: Recent progress in advanced nanostructures synthesized from biomass resources for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is reviewed. The ORR plays a significant role in the performance of numerous energy-conversion devices, including low-temperature hydrogen and alcohol fuel cells, microbial fuel cells, as well as metal-air batteries. The viability of such fuel cells is strongly related to the cost of the electrodes, especially the cathodic ORR electrocatalyst. Hence, inexpensive and abundant plant and animal biomass have become attractive options to obtain electrocatalysts upon conversion into active carbon. Bioresource selection and processing criteria are discussed in light of their influence on the physicochemical properties of the ORR nanostructures. The resulting electrocatalytic activity and durability are introduced and compared to those from conventional Pt/C-based electrocatalysts. These ORR catalysts are also active for oxygen or hydrogen evolution reactions.

331 citations

DOI
Claudia Backes1, Claudia Backes2, Amr M. Abdelkader3, Concepción Alonso4, Amandine Andrieux-Ledier5, Raul Arenal6, Raul Arenal7, Jon Azpeitia7, Nilanthy Balakrishnan8, Luca Banszerus9, Julien Barjon5, Ruben Bartali10, Sebastiano Bellani11, Claire Berger12, Claire Berger13, Reinhard Berger14, M.M. Bernal Ortega15, Carlo Bernard16, Peter H. Beton8, André Beyer17, Alberto Bianco18, Peter Bøggild19, Francesco Bonaccorso11, Gabriela Borin Barin20, Cristina Botas, Rebeca A. Bueno7, Daniel Carriazo21, Andres Castellanos-Gomez7, Meganne Christian, Artur Ciesielski18, Tymoteusz Ciuk, Matthew T. Cole, Jonathan N. Coleman2, Camilla Coletti11, Luigi Crema10, Huanyao Cun16, Daniela Dasler22, Domenico De Fazio3, Noel Díez, Simon Drieschner23, Georg S. Duesberg24, Roman Fasel25, Roman Fasel20, Xinliang Feng14, Alberto Fina15, Stiven Forti11, Costas Galiotis26, Costas Galiotis27, Giovanni Garberoglio28, Jorge M. Garcia7, Jose A. Garrido, Marco Gibertini29, Armin Gölzhäuser17, Julio Gómez, Thomas Greber16, Frank Hauke22, Adrian Hemmi16, Irene Hernández-Rodríguez7, Andreas Hirsch22, Stephen A. Hodge3, Yves Huttel7, Peter Uhd Jepsen19, I. Jimenez7, Ute Kaiser30, Tommi Kaplas31, HoKwon Kim29, Andras Kis29, Konstantinos Papagelis32, Konstantinos Papagelis27, Kostas Kostarelos33, Aleksandra Krajewska34, Kangho Lee24, Changfeng Li35, Harri Lipsanen35, Andrea Liscio, Martin R. Lohe14, Annick Loiseau5, Lucia Lombardi3, María Francisca López7, Oliver Martin22, Cristina Martín36, Lidia Martínez7, José A. Martín-Gago7, José I. Martínez7, Nicola Marzari29, Alvaro Mayoral37, Alvaro Mayoral6, John B. McManus2, Manuela Melucci, Javier Méndez7, Cesar Merino, Pablo Merino7, Andreas Meyer22, Elisa Miniussi16, Vaidotas Miseikis11, Neeraj Mishra11, Vittorio Morandi, Carmen Munuera7, Roberto Muñoz7, Hugo Nolan2, Luca Ortolani, A. K. Ott38, A. K. Ott3, Irene Palacio7, Vincenzo Palermo39, John Parthenios27, Iwona Pasternak40, Amalia Patanè8, Maurizio Prato41, Maurizio Prato21, Henri Prevost5, Vladimir Prudkovskiy13, Nicola M. Pugno42, Nicola M. Pugno43, Nicola M. Pugno44, Teófilo Rojo45, Antonio Rossi11, Pascal Ruffieux20, Paolo Samorì18, Léonard Schué5, Eki J. Setijadi10, Thomas Seyller46, Giorgio Speranza10, Christoph Stampfer9, I. Stenger5, Wlodek Strupinski40, Yuri Svirko31, Simone Taioli47, Simone Taioli28, Kenneth B. K. Teo, Matteo Testi10, Flavia Tomarchio3, Mauro Tortello15, Emanuele Treossi, Andrey Turchanin48, Ester Vázquez36, Elvira Villaro, Patrick Rebsdorf Whelan19, Zhenyuan Xia39, Rositza Yakimova, Sheng Yang14, G. Reza Yazdi, Chanyoung Yim24, Duhee Yoon3, Xianghui Zhang17, Xiaodong Zhuang14, Luigi Colombo49, Andrea C. Ferrari3, Mar García-Hernández7 
Heidelberg University1, Trinity College, Dublin2, University of Cambridge3, Autonomous University of Madrid4, Université Paris-Saclay5, University of Zaragoza6, Spanish National Research Council7, University of Nottingham8, RWTH Aachen University9, Kessler Foundation10, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia11, Georgia Institute of Technology12, University of Grenoble13, Dresden University of Technology14, Polytechnic University of Turin15, University of Zurich16, Bielefeld University17, University of Strasbourg18, Technical University of Denmark19, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology20, Ikerbasque21, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg22, Technische Universität München23, Bundeswehr University Munich24, University of Bern25, University of Patras26, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas27, Center for Theoretical Studies, University of Miami28, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne29, University of Ulm30, University of Eastern Finland31, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki32, University of Manchester33, Polish Academy of Sciences34, Aalto University35, University of Castilla–La Mancha36, ShanghaiTech University37, University of Exeter38, Chalmers University of Technology39, Warsaw University of Technology40, University of Trieste41, Instituto Politécnico Nacional42, University of Trento43, Queen Mary University of London44, University of the Basque Country45, Chemnitz University of Technology46, Charles University in Prague47, University of Jena48, University of Texas at Dallas49
29 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures, adopting a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature and from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results.
Abstract: © 2020 The Author(s). We present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures. We adopt a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature as well as from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results. Section I is devoted to 'bottom up' approaches, whereby individual constituents are pieced together into more complex structures. We consider graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) produced either by solution processing or by on-surface synthesis in ultra high vacuum (UHV), as well carbon nanomembranes (CNM). Production of a variety of GNRs with tailored band gaps and edge shapes is now possible. CNMs can be tuned in terms of porosity, crystallinity and electronic behaviour. Section II covers 'top down' techniques. These rely on breaking down of a layered precursor, in the graphene case usually natural crystals like graphite or artificially synthesized materials, such as highly oriented pyrolythic graphite, monolayers or few layers (FL) flakes. The main focus of this section is on various exfoliation techniques in a liquid media, either intercalation or liquid phase exfoliation (LPE). The choice of precursor, exfoliation method, medium as well as the control of parameters such as time or temperature are crucial. A definite choice of parameters and conditions yields a particular material with specific properties that makes it more suitable for a targeted application. We cover protocols for the graphitic precursors to graphene oxide (GO). This is an important material for a range of applications in biomedicine, energy storage, nanocomposites, etc. Hummers' and modified Hummers' methods are used to make GO that subsequently can be reduced to obtain reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with a variety of strategies. GO flakes are also employed to prepare three-dimensional (3d) low density structures, such as sponges, foams, hydro- or aerogels. The assembly of flakes into 3d structures can provide improved mechanical properties. Aerogels with a highly open structure, with interconnected hierarchical pores, can enhance the accessibility to the whole surface area, as relevant for a number of applications, such as energy storage. The main recipes to yield graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) are also discussed. GICs are suitable precursors for covalent functionalization of graphene, but can also be used for the synthesis of uncharged graphene in solution. Degradation of the molecules intercalated in GICs can be triggered by high temperature treatment or microwave irradiation, creating a gas pressure surge in graphite and exfoliation. Electrochemical exfoliation by applying a voltage in an electrolyte to a graphite electrode can be tuned by varying precursors, electrolytes and potential. Graphite electrodes can be either negatively or positively intercalated to obtain GICs that are subsequently exfoliated. We also discuss the materials that can be amenable to exfoliation, by employing a theoretical data-mining approach. The exfoliation of LMs usually results in a heterogeneous dispersion of flakes with different lateral size and thickness. This is a critical bottleneck for applications, and hinders the full exploitation of GRMs produced by solution processing. The establishment of procedures to control the morphological properties of exfoliated GRMs, which also need to be industrially scalable, is one of the key needs. Section III deals with the processing of flakes. (Ultra)centrifugation techniques have thus far been the most investigated to sort GRMs following ultrasonication, shear mixing, ball milling, microfluidization, and wet-jet milling. It allows sorting by size and thickness. Inks formulated from GRM dispersions can be printed using a number of processes, from inkjet to screen printing. Each technique has specific rheological requirements, as well as geometrical constraints. The solvent choice is critical, not only for the GRM stability, but also in terms of optimizing printing on different substrates, such as glass, Si, plastic, paper, etc, all with different surface energies. Chemical modifications of such substrates is also a key step. Sections IV-VII are devoted to the growth of GRMs on various substrates and their processing after growth to place them on the surface of choice for specific applications. The substrate for graphene growth is a key determinant of the nature and quality of the resultant film. The lattice mismatch between graphene and substrate influences the resulting crystallinity. Growth on insulators, such as SiO2, typically results in films with small crystallites, whereas growth on the close-packed surfaces of metals yields highly crystalline films. Section IV outlines the growth of graphene on SiC substrates. This satisfies the requirements for electronic applications, with well-defined graphene-substrate interface, low trapped impurities and no need for transfer. It also allows graphene structures and devices to be measured directly on the growth substrate. The flatness of the substrate results in graphene with minimal strain and ripples on large areas, allowing spectroscopies and surface science to be performed. We also discuss the surface engineering by intercalation of the resulting graphene, its integration with Si-wafers and the production of nanostructures with the desired shape, with no need for patterning. Section V deals with chemical vapour deposition (CVD) onto various transition metals and on insulators. Growth on Ni results in graphitized polycrystalline films. While the thickness of these films can be optimized by controlling the deposition parameters, such as the type of hydrocarbon precursor and temperature, it is difficult to attain single layer graphene (SLG) across large areas, owing to the simultaneous nucleation/growth and solution/precipitation mechanisms. The differing characteristics of polycrystalline Ni films facilitate the growth of graphitic layers at different rates, resulting in regions with differing numbers of graphitic layers. High-quality films can be grown on Cu. Cu is available in a variety of shapes and forms, such as foils, bulks, foams, thin films on other materials and powders, making it attractive for industrial production of large area graphene films. The push to use CVD graphene in applications has also triggered a research line for the direct growth on insulators. The quality of the resulting films is lower than possible to date on metals, but enough, in terms of transmittance and resistivity, for many applications as described in section V. Transfer technologies are the focus of section VI. CVD synthesis of graphene on metals and bottom up molecular approaches require SLG to be transferred to the final target substrates. To have technological impact, the advances in production of high-quality large-area CVD graphene must be commensurate with those on transfer and placement on the final substrates. This is a prerequisite for most applications, such as touch panels, anticorrosion coatings, transparent electrodes and gas sensors etc. New strategies have improved the transferred graphene quality, making CVD graphene a feasible option for CMOS foundries. Methods based on complete etching of the metal substrate in suitable etchants, typically iron chloride, ammonium persulfate, or hydrogen chloride although reliable, are time- and resourceconsuming, with damage to graphene and production of metal and etchant residues. Electrochemical delamination in a low-concentration aqueous solution is an alternative. In this case metallic substrates can be reused. Dry transfer is less detrimental for the SLG quality, enabling a deterministic transfer. There is a large range of layered materials (LMs) beyond graphite. Only few of them have been already exfoliated and fully characterized. Section VII deals with the growth of some of these materials. Amongst them, h-BN, transition metal tri- and di-chalcogenides are of paramount importance. The growth of h-BN is at present considered essential for the development of graphene in (opto) electronic applications, as h-BN is ideal as capping layer or substrate. The interesting optical and electronic properties of TMDs also require the development of scalable methods for their production. Large scale growth using chemical/physical vapour deposition or thermal assisted conversion has been thus far limited to a small set, such as h-BN or some TMDs. Heterostructures could also be directly grown.

330 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the physical and technical constraints that influence single-electron charge transport is presented, and a broad variety of proposed realizations are presented, some of them have already proven experimentally to nearly fulfill the demanding needs, in terms of transfer errors and transfer rate, of quantum metrology of electrical quantities, whereas some others are currently "just" wild ideas, still often potentially competitive if technical constraints can be lifted.
Abstract: The control electrons at the level of the elementary charge e was demonstrated experimentally already in the 1980s. Ever since, the production of an electrical current ef, or its integer multiple, at a drive frequency f has been in a focus of research for metrological purposes.This review discusses the generic physical phenomena and technical constraints that influence single-electron charge transport and presents a broad variety of proposed realizations. Some of them have already proven experimentally to nearly fulfill the demanding needs, in terms of transfer errors and transfer rate, of quantum metrology of electrical quantities, whereas some others are currently ‘‘just’’ wild ideas, still often potentially competitive if technical constraints can be lifted. The important issues of readout of singleelectron events and potential error correction schemes based on them are also discussed. Finally, an account is given of the status of single-electron current sources in the bigger framework of electric quantum standards and of the future international SI system of units, and applications and uses of single-electron devices outside the metrological context are briefly discussed.

330 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new bio-inspired algorithm, namely Bird Swarm Algorithm (BSA), is proposed for solving optimisation applications based on the swarm intelligence extracted from the social behaviours and social interactions in bird swarms.
Abstract: A new bio-inspired algorithm, namely Bird Swarm Algorithm (BSA), is proposed for solving optimisation applications. BSA is based on the swarm intelligence extracted from the social behaviours and social interactions in bird swarms. Birds mainly have three kinds of behaviours: foraging behaviour, vigilance behaviour and flight behaviour. Birds may forage for food and escape from the predators by the social interactions to obtain a high chance of survival. By modelling these social behaviours, social interactions and the related swarm intelligence, four search strategies associated with five simplified rules are formulated in BSA. Simulations and comparisons based on eighteen benchmark problems demonstrate the effectiveness, superiority and stability of BSA. Some proposals for future research about BSA are also discussed.

330 citations


Authors

Showing all 10135 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
John B. Goodenough1511064113741
Ashok Kumar1515654164086
Anne Lähteenmäki11648581977
Kalyanmoy Deb112713122802
Riitta Hari11149143873
Robin I. M. Dunbar11158647498
Andreas Richter11076948262
Mika Sillanpää96101944260
Muhammad Farooq92134137533
Ivo Babuška9037641465
Merja Penttilä8730322351
Andries Meijerink8742629335
T. Poutanen8612033158
Sajal K. Das85112429785
Kalle Lyytinen8442627708
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Georgia Institute of Technology
119K papers, 4.6M citations

95% related

Delft University of Technology
94.4K papers, 2.7M citations

94% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

94% related

Nanyang Technological University
112.8K papers, 3.2M citations

94% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023101
2022342
20212,842
20203,030
20192,749
20182,719