scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Kyoto University

EducationKyoto, Japan
About: Kyoto University is a education organization based out in Kyoto, Japan. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Catalysis & Population. The organization has 85837 authors who have published 217215 publications receiving 6526826 citations. The organization is also known as: Kyōto University & Kyōto daigaku.
Topics: Catalysis, Population, Gene, Transplantation, Ion


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Tomi Akinyemiju1, Semaw Ferede Abera2, Semaw Ferede Abera3, Muktar Beshir Ahmed4, Noore Alam5, Noore Alam6, Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu7, Christine Allen8, Rajaa Al-Raddadi, Nelson Alvis-Guzman9, Yaw Ampem Amoako10, Al Artaman11, Tadesse Awoke Ayele12, Aleksandra Barac, Isabela M. Benseñor13, Adugnaw Berhane3, Zulfiqar A Bhutta14, Jacqueline Castillo-Rivas, Abdulaal A Chitheer, Jee-Young Choi15, Benjamin C Cowie, Lalit Dandona16, Lalit Dandona8, Rakhi Dandona8, Rakhi Dandona16, Subhojit Dey, Daniel Dicker8, Huyen Do Phuc17, Donatus U. Ekwueme18, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Florian Fischer19, Thomas Fürst20, Thomas Fürst21, Thomas Fürst22, Jamie Hancock8, Simon I. Hay8, Peter J. Hotez23, Peter J. Hotez24, Sun Ha Jee25, Amir Kasaeian26, Yousef Khader27, Young-Ho Khang15, G Anil Kumar16, Michael Kutz8, Heidi J. Larson28, Alan D. Lopez29, Alan D. Lopez8, Raimundas Lunevicius30, Raimundas Lunevicius31, Reza Malekzadeh26, Colm McAlinden, Toni Meier32, Walter Mendoza33, Ali H. Mokdad8, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh34, Gabriele Nagel35, Quyen Nguyen17, Grant Nguyen8, Felix Akpojene Ogbo36, George C Patton29, David M. Pereira37, Farshad Pourmalek38, Mostafa Qorbani, Amir Radfar39, Gholamreza Roshandel40, Joshua A. Salomon41, Juan Sanabria42, Juan Sanabria43, Benn Sartorius44, Maheswar Satpathy45, Maheswar Satpathy46, Monika Sawhney42, Sadaf G. Sepanlou26, Katya Anne Shackelford8, Hirbo Shore47, Jiandong Sun48, Desalegn Tadese Mengistu7, Roman Topór-Mądry49, Roman Topór-Mądry50, Bach Xuan Tran51, Bach Xuan Tran52, Kingsley N. Ukwaja, Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov53, Stein Emil Vollset54, Stein Emil Vollset55, Theo Vos8, Tolassa Wakayo4, Elisabete Weiderpass56, Elisabete Weiderpass57, Andrea Werdecker, Naohiro Yonemoto58, Mustafa Z. Younis59, Mustafa Z. Younis41, Chuanhua Yu60, Zoubida Zaidi, Liguo Zhu18, Christopher J L Murray8, Mohsen Naghavi8, Christina Fitzmaurice8, Christina Fitzmaurice61 
University of Alabama at Birmingham1, University of Hohenheim2, College of Health Sciences, Bahrain3, Jimma University4, University of Queensland5, Queensland Government6, Mekelle University7, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation8, University of Cartagena9, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital10, University of Manitoba11, University of Gondar12, University of São Paulo13, Aga Khan University14, New Generation University College15, Public Health Foundation of India16, Duy Tan University17, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention18, Bielefeld University19, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute20, University of Basel21, Imperial College London22, Baylor College of Medicine23, Boston Children's Hospital24, Yonsei University25, Tehran University of Medical Sciences26, Jordan University of Science and Technology27, University of London28, University of Melbourne29, University of Liverpool30, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust31, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg32, United Nations Population Fund33, Iran University of Medical Sciences34, University of Ulm35, University of Sydney36, University of Porto37, University of British Columbia38, A.T. Still University39, Golestan University40, Harvard University41, Marshall University42, Case Western Reserve University43, University of KwaZulu-Natal44, Utkal University45, AIIMS, New Delhi46, Haramaya University47, Queensland University of Technology48, Jagiellonian University Medical College49, Wrocław Medical University50, Hanoi Medical University51, Johns Hopkins University52, National Research University – Higher School of Economics53, University of Bergen54, Norwegian Institute of Public Health55, University of Tromsø56, Karolinska Institutet57, Kyoto University58, Jackson State University59, Wuhan University60, University of Washington61
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report results of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2015 study on primary liver cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries or territories from 1990 to 2015, and present global, regional, and national estimates on the burden of liver cancer attributable to hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol, and an “other” group that encompasses residual causes.
Abstract: Importance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths globally. The most common causes for liver cancer include hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol use. Objective To report results of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2015 study on primary liver cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries or territories from 1990 to 2015, and present global, regional, and national estimates on the burden of liver cancer attributable to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and an “other” group that encompasses residual causes. Design, Settings, and Participants Mortality was estimated using vital registration and cancer registry data in an ensemble modeling approach. Single-cause mortality estimates were adjusted for all-cause mortality. Incidence was derived from mortality estimates and the mortality-to-incidence ratio. Through a systematic literature review, data on the proportions of liver cancer due to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and other causes were identified. Years of life lost were calculated by multiplying each death by a standard life expectancy. Prevalence was estimated using mortality-to-incidence ratio as surrogate for survival. Total prevalence was divided into 4 sequelae that were multiplied by disability weights to derive years lived with disability (YLDs). DALYs were the sum of years of life lost and YLDs. Main Outcomes and Measures Liver cancer mortality, incidence, YLDs, years of life lost, DALYs by etiology, age, sex, country, and year. Results There were 854 000 incident cases of liver cancer and 810 000 deaths globally in 2015, contributing to 20 578 000 DALYs. Cases of incident liver cancer increased by 75% between 1990 and 2015, of which 47% can be explained by changing population age structures, 35% by population growth, and −8% to changing age-specific incidence rates. The male-to-female ratio for age-standardized liver cancer mortality was 2.8. Globally, HBV accounted for 265 000 liver cancer deaths (33%), alcohol for 245 000 (30%), HCV for 167 000 (21%), and other causes for 133 000 (16%) deaths, with substantial variation between countries in the underlying etiologies. Conclusions and Relevance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths in many countries. Causes of liver cancer differ widely among populations. Our results show that most cases of liver cancer can be prevented through vaccination, antiviral treatment, safe blood transfusion and injection practices, as well as interventions to reduce excessive alcohol use. In line with the Sustainable Development Goals, the identification and elimination of risk factors for liver cancer will be required to achieve a sustained reduction in liver cancer burden. The GBD study can be used to guide these prevention efforts.

1,208 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that lymphatics can be established in solid tumors and implicates VEGF family members in determining the route of metastatic spread and could be blocked with an antibody specific for V EGF-D.
Abstract: Metastasis to local lymph nodes via the lymphatic vessels is a common step in the spread of solid tumors. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the spread of cancer by the lymphatics, we examined the ability of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D, a ligand for the lymphatic growth factor receptor VEGFR-3/Flt-4, to induce formation of lymphatics in a mouse tumor model. Staining with markers specific for lymphatic endothelium demonstrated that VEGF-D induced the formation of lymphatics within tumors. Moreover, expression of VEGF-D in tumor cells led to spread of the tumor to lymph nodes, whereas expression of VEGF, an angiogenic growth factor which activates VEGFR-2 but not VEGFR-3, did not. VEGF-D also promoted tumor angiogenesis and growth. Lymphatic spread induced by VEGF-D could be blocked with an antibody specific for VEGF-D. This study demonstrates that lymphatics can be established in solid tumors and implicates VEGF family members in determining the route of metastatic spread.

1,203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Sep 2010-JAMA
TL;DR: Compared with the use of fluorouracil plus folinic acid, gemcitabine did not result in improved overall survival in patients with completely resected pancreatic cancer.
Abstract: Context Adjuvant fluorouracil has been shown to be of benefit for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine is known to be the most effective agent in advanced disease as well as an effective agent in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Objective To determine whether fluorouracil or gemcitabine is superior in terms of overall survival as adjuvant treatment following resection of pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 trial, an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial conducted in 159 pancreatic cancer centers in Europe, Australasia, Japan, and Canada. Included in ESPAC-3 version 2 were 1088 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone cancer resection; patients were randomized between July 2000 and January 2007 and underwent at least 2 years of follow-up. Interventions Patients received either fluorouracil plus folinic acid (folinic acid, 20 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus injection, followed by fluorouracil, 425 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus injection given 1-5 days every 28 days) (n=551) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion once a week for 3 of every 4 weeks) (n=537) for 6 months. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome measure was overall survival; secondary measures were toxicity, progression-free survival, and quality of life. Results Final analysis was carried out on an intention-to-treat basis after a median of 34.2 (interquartile range, 27.1-43.4) months' follow-up after 753 deaths (69%). Median survival was 23.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-25.0) months for patients treated with fluorouracil plus folinic acid and 23.6 (95% CI, 21.4-26.4) months for those treated with gemcitabine (chi(2)(1) = 0.7; P = .39; hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.81-1.08]). Seventy-seven patients (14%) receiving fluorouracil plus folinic acid had 97 treatment-related serious adverse events, compared with 40 patients (7.5%) receiving gemcitabine, who had 52 events (P<.001). There were no significant differences in either progression-free survival or global quality-of-life scores between the treatment groups. Conclusion Compared with the use of fluorouracil plus folinic acid, gemcitabine did not result in improved overall survival in patients with completely resected pancreatic cancer.

1,203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Michael reaction of malonates to nitrooleolefins with chiral bifunctional organocatalysts, bearing both a thiourea and tertiary amino group, afforded Michael adducts with high yields and enantioselectivities.
Abstract: Michael reaction of malonates to nitroolefins with chiral bifunctional organocatalysts, bearing both a thiourea and tertiary amino group, afforded Michael adducts with high yields and enantioselectivities (up to 95%, up to 93% ee).

1,202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that an optic cup structure can form by self-organization in human ESC culture and an optimized vitrification method enables en bloc cryopreservation of stratified neural retina of human origin.

1,200 citations


Authors

Showing all 86225 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Kari Alitalo174817114231
Ralph M. Steinman171453121518
Masayuki Yamamoto1711576123028
Karl Deisseroth160556101487
Kenji Kangawa1531117110059
Takashi Taniguchi1522141110658
Ben Zhong Tang1492007116294
Takeo Kanade147799103237
Yuji Matsuzawa143836116711
Tasuku Honjo14171288428
Kenneth M. Yamada13944672136
Y. B. Hsiung138125894278
Shuh Narumiya13759570183
Kevin P. Campbell13752160854
Junji Tojo13587884615
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Tokyo
337.5K papers, 10.1M citations

99% related

Nagoya University
128.2K papers, 3.2M citations

99% related

Osaka University
185.6K papers, 5.1M citations

97% related

University of Tsukuba
79.4K papers, 1.9M citations

97% related

Hokkaido University
115.4K papers, 2.6M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023234
2022679
20218,533
20208,740
20198,050
20187,932