scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Southern Denmark

EducationOdense, Syddanmark, Denmark
About: University of Southern Denmark is a education organization based out in Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 11928 authors who have published 37918 publications receiving 1258559 citations. The organization is also known as: SDU.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Common subjective symptoms after MTBI are not necessarily caused by brain injury per se, but they can be persistent in some patients, and show that common postconcussion symptoms are not specific to MTBI/concussion and occur after other injuries as well.

287 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Aug 2016-eLife
TL;DR: Using Drosophila and human cells, it is shown that seipin, an ER protein implicated in LD biology, mediates a discrete step in LD formation—the conversion of small, nascent LDs to larger, mature LDs.
Abstract: Living organisms often store energy in the form of fat molecules called triglycerides. Enzymes in a compartment of the cell called the endoplasmic reticulum catalyze the chemical reactions needed to make these triglycerides. The cell then stores the triglycerides in a different structure called the lipid droplet. Lipid droplets form from the endoplasmic reticulum in an organized manner, but little is known about the cellular machinery that gives rise to lipid droplets. A protein called seipin is thought to be involved in lipid droplet formation. Seipin resides in the endoplasmic reticulum and a shortage of this protein in cells leads to abnormal lipid droplets – that is, cells often have lots of tiny lipid droplets or a few giant ones. People who lack seipin lose much of their fat tissue and instead store fat in the wrong places, such as the liver. Now, Wang et al. have studied the seipin protein in insect and human cells grown in the laboratory. The experiments confirmed that cells that lack the seipin protein form lots of tiny dot-like structures containing triglycerides that fail to grow into normal-sized lipid droplets. These lipid droplets have different proteins on their surface, which may impair their ability to store fat. Wang et al. also discovered that in normal cells, the seipin protein is found at distinct spots in the endoplasmic reticulum. This distribution appears to allow seipin to come into contact with the small, newly formed lipid droplets and enable them to grow. Together these findings suggest that the seipin protein could form part of a molecular machine that allows more triglycerides to be added into newly formed lipid droplets causing the droplets to grow as normal. When seipin is not present the newly formed lipid droplets initially become stuck in a smaller form. As a consequence, a few of these tiny droplets later enter a different cellular pathway of lipid droplet expansion, which turns them into abnormally large lipid droplets. Future challenges will be to determine precisely how seipin enables newly formed lipid droplets to grow. It will also be important to confirm whether seipin works with other proteins as part of a molecular machine and, if so, to investigate how these proteins affect the formation and growth of lipid droplets.

287 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review of current related issues in multiscale modeling of soft and biological matter focuses on solvent-free modeling which offers a different route to coarse graining by integrating out the degrees of freedom associated with solvent.
Abstract: In this review, we focus on four current related issues in multiscale modeling of soft and biological matter. First, we discuss how to use structural information from detailed models (or experiments) to construct coarse-grained ones in a hierarchical and systematic way. This is discussed in the context of the so-called Henderson theorem and the inverse Monte Carlo method of Lyubartsev and Laaksonen. In the second part, we take a different look at coarse graining by analyzing conformations of molecules. This is done by the application of self-organizing maps, i.e., a neural network type approach. Such an approach can be used to guide the selection of the relevant degrees of freedom. Then, we discuss technical issues related to the popular dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) method. Importantly, the potentials derived using the inverse Monte Carlo method can be used together with the DPD thermostat. In the final part we focus on solvent-free modeling which offers a different route to coarse graining by integrating out the degrees of freedom associated with solvent.

286 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marleen H. M. de Moor1, Stéphanie Martine van den Berg2, Karin J. H. Verweij3, Karin J. H. Verweij1, Robert F. Krueger4, Michelle Luciano5, Alejandro Arias Vasquez6, Lindsay K. Matteson4, Jaime Derringer7, Tõnu Esko8, Najaf Amin9, Scott D. Gordon3, Narelle K. Hansell3, Amy B. Hart10, Ilkka Seppälä, Jennifer E. Huffman5, Bettina Konte11, Jari Lahti12, Minyoung Lee13, Michael B. Miller4, Teresa Nutile14, Toshiko Tanaka15, Alexander Teumer16, Alexander Viktorin17, Juho Wedenoja12, Gonçalo R. Abecasis18, Daniel E. Adkins13, Arpana Agrawal19, Jüri Allik20, Jüri Allik8, Katja Appel16, Timothy B. Bigdeli13, Fabio Busonero13, Harry Campbell5, Paul T. Costa21, George Davey Smith22, Gail Davies5, Harriet de Wit10, Jun Ding15, Barbara E. Engelhardt23, Johan G. Eriksson, Iryna O. Fedko1, Luigi Ferrucci15, Barbara Franke6, Ina Giegling11, Richard A. Grucza19, Annette M. Hartmann11, Andrew C. Heath19, Kati Heinonen12, Anjali K. Henders3, Georg Homuth16, Jouke-Jan Hottenga1, William G. Iacono4, Joost G. E. Janzing6, Markus Jokela12, Robert Karlsson17, John P. Kemp24, John P. Kemp22, Matthew G. Kirkpatrick10, Antti Latvala12, Antti Latvala25, Terho Lehtimäki, David C. Liewald5, Pamela A. F. Madden19, Chiara Magri26, Patrik K. E. Magnusson17, Jonathan Marten5, Andrea Maschio27, Sarah E. Medland3, Evelin Mihailov8, Yuri Milaneschi1, Grant W. Montgomery3, Matthias Nauck16, Klaasjan G. Ouwens1, Aarno Palotie28, Aarno Palotie12, Erik Pettersson17, Ozren Polasek29, Yong Qian15, Laura Pulkki-Råback12, Olli T. Raitakari30, Anu Realo8, Richard J. Rose31, Daniela Ruggiero14, Carsten Oliver Schmidt16, Wendy S. Slutske32, Rossella Sorice14, John M. Starr5, Beate St Pourcain22, Angelina R. Sutin33, Angelina R. Sutin15, Nicholas J. Timpson22, Holly Trochet5, Sita H. Vermeulen6, Eero Vuoksimaa12, Elisabeth Widen12, Jasper Wouda2, Jasper Wouda1, Margaret J. Wright3, Lina Zgaga5, Lina Zgaga34, David J. Porteous5, Alessandra Minelli26, Abraham A. Palmer10, Dan Rujescu11, Marina Ciullo14, Caroline Hayward5, Igor Rudan5, Andres Metspalu5, Jaakko Kaprio12, Jaakko Kaprio25, Ian J. Deary5, Katri Räikkönen12, James F. Wilson5, Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen12, Laura J. Bierut19, John M. Hettema13, Hans Joergen Grabe13, Cornelia M. van Duijn9, David M. Evans22, David M. Evans24, David Schlessinger15, N. L. Pedersen14, Antonio Terracciano33, Matt McGue35, Matt McGue4, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1, Nicholas G. Martin3, Dorret I. Boomsma1 
TL;DR: This study identifies a novel locus for neuroticism located in a known gene that has been associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in previous studies and shows that neuroticism is influenced by many genetic variants of small effect that are either common or tagged by common variants.
Abstract: Importance Neuroticism is a pervasive risk factor for psychiatric conditions. It genetically overlaps with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is therefore an important phenotype for psychiatric genetics. The Genetics of Personality Consortium has created a resource for genome-wide association analyses of personality traits in more than 63 000 participants (including MDD cases). Objectives To identify genetic variants associated with neuroticism by performing a meta-analysis of genome-wide association results based on 1000 Genomes imputation; to evaluate whether common genetic variants as assessed by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) explain variation in neuroticism by estimating SNP-based heritability; and to examine whether SNPs that predict neuroticism also predict MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 30 cohorts with genome-wide genotype, personality, and MDD data from the Genetics of Personality Consortium. The study included 63 661 participants from 29 discovery cohorts and 9786 participants from a replication cohort. Participants came from Europe, the United States, or Australia. Analyses were conducted between 2012 and 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures Neuroticism scores harmonized across all 29 discovery cohorts by item response theory analysis, and clinical MDD case-control status in 2 of the cohorts. Results A genome-wide significant SNP was found on 3p14 in MAGI1 (rs35855737; P = 9.26 × 10−9 in the discovery meta-analysis). This association was not replicated (P = .32), but the SNP was still genome-wide significant in the meta-analysis of all 30 cohorts (P = 2.38 × 10−8). Common genetic variants explain 15% of the variance in neuroticism. Polygenic scores based on the meta-analysis of neuroticism in 27 cohorts significantly predicted neuroticism (1.09 × 10−12 < P < .05) and MDD (4.02 × 10−9 < P < .05) in the 2 other cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance This study identifies a novel locus for neuroticism. The variant is located in a known gene that has been associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in previous studies. In addition, the study shows that neuroticism is influenced by many genetic variants of small effect that are either common or tagged by common variants. These genetic variants also influence MDD. Future studies should confirm the role of the MAGI1 locus for neuroticism and further investigate the association of MAGI1 and the polygenic association to a range of other psychiatric disorders that are phenotypically correlated with neuroticism

286 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Christopher I. Amos1, Joe Dennis2, Zhaoming Wang3, Jinyoung Byun1, Fredrick R. Schumacher4, Simon A. Gayther5, Graham Casey6, David J. Hunter7, Thomas A. Sellers, Stephen B. Gruber6, Alison M. Dunning2, Kyriaki Michailidou2, Laura Fachal2, Kimberly F. Doheny8, Amanda B. Spurdle9, Yafang Li1, Xiangjun Xiao1, Jane Romm8, Elizabeth W. Pugh8, Gerhard A. Coetzee10, Dennis J. Hazelett5, Stig E. Bojesen11, Charlisse Caga-Anan, Christopher A. Haiman5, Ahsan Kamal1, Craig Luccarini2, Daniel C. Tessier12, Daniel Vincent12, Francois Bacot12, David Van Den Berg6, Stefanie A. Nelson, Stephen Demetriades13, David E. Goldgar14, Fergus J. Couch15, Judith L. Forman1, Graham G. Giles16, Graham G. Giles17, David V. Conti6, Heike Bickeböller18, Angela Risch19, Angela Risch20, Melanie Waldenberger, Irene Brüske-Hohlfeld, Belynda Hicks, Hua Ling8, Lesley McGuffog16, Lesley McGuffog17, Andy C. H. Lee2, Karoline Kuchenbaecker2, Penny Soucy21, Judith Manz, Julie M. Cunningham15, Katja Butterbach20, Zsofia Kote-Jarai22, Peter Kraft7, Liesel M. FitzGerald17, Liesel M. FitzGerald16, Sara Lindström23, Sara Lindström7, Marcia Adams8, James McKay24, Catherine M. Phelan, Sara Benlloch2, Linda E. Kelemen25, Paul Brennan24, Marjorie J. Riggan26, Tracy A. O'Mara9, Hongbing Shen27, Yongyong Shi28, Deborah J. Thompson2, Marc T. Goodman5, Sune F. Nielsen11, Andrew Berchuck26, Sylvie Laboissiere12, Stephanie L. Schmit29, Tameka Shelford8, Christopher K. Edlund6, Jack A. Taylor30, John K. Field31, Sue K. Park32, Kenneth Offit33, Kenneth Offit34, Kenneth Offit35, Mads Thomassen36, Rita K. Schmutzler, Laura Ottini37, Rayjean J. Hung38, Jonathan Marchini39, Ali Amin Al Olama2, Ulrike Peters40, Rosalind A. Eeles22, Michael F. Seldin41, Elizabeth M. Gillanders, Daniela Seminara, Antonis C. Antoniou2, Paul D.P. Pharoah2, Georgia Chenevix-Trench9, Stephen J. Chanock, Jacques Simard21, Douglas F. Easton2 
TL;DR: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. METHODS: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. RESULTS: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. IMPACT: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126-35. ©2016 AACR.

286 citations


Authors

Showing all 12150 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Paul M. Ridker2331242245097
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Matthias Mann221887230213
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Gang Chen1673372149819
Jun Wang1661093141621
Harvey F. Lodish165782101124
Jens J. Holst1601536107858
Rajesh Kumar1494439140830
J. Fraser Stoddart147123996083
Debbie A Lawlor1471114101123
Børge G. Nordestgaard147104795530
Oluf Pedersen135939106974
Rasmus Nielsen13555684898
Torben Jørgensen13588386822
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Copenhagen
149.7K papers, 5.9M citations

96% related

Lund University
124.6K papers, 5M citations

96% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

University of British Columbia
209.6K papers, 9.2M citations

93% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202382
2022410
20214,043
20203,614
20192,967
20182,603