scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Men and Women of the Corporation

Mary Anne Devanna
- 01 Apr 1978 - 
- Vol. 14, Iss: 2, pp 247-250
About
This article is published in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.The article was published on 1978-04-01. It has received 3053 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Where Do Immigrants Fare Worse? Modeling Workplace Wage Gap Variation with Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine variation in workplace wage inequalities between native Swedes and non-Western immigrants. And they find that immigrant-native wage gaps vary dramatically across workplaces, even net of strong human capital controls.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Lies Beneath Seemingly Positive Campus Climate Results: Institutional Sexism, Racism, and Male Hostility Toward Equity Initiatives and Liberal Bias

TL;DR: In this article, qualitative results from a campus climate study at one predominately white university were presented, which revealed "what lies beneath" a seemingly positive campus climate, including lack of deep diversity dialogue, hostility toward diversity efforts, symbolic racism, resentment of liberal bias, and larger issues of institutional sexism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engaging new nurses: the role of psychological capital and workplace empowerment:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors test a hypothesised model linking perceptions of workplace empowerment and psychological capital (PsyCap) to new graduate nurses' work engagement by integrating the two factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engineering Ignorance: The Problem of Gender Equity in Engineering

TL;DR: The authors argue that women's unpaid work should be valued, that we should be aware of how certain tasks become gendered, that things valued as feminine should be reevaluated, and that women should have equal access to all forms of work so that unpaid work is distributed more equally.
Journal ArticleDOI

States' spending for public welfare and their suicide rates, 1960 to 1995: what is the problem?

TL;DR: Of all the variables, the influence of divorce was the most persistent and pronounced, followed by the percentage of whites in states’ populations, and states can help counter suicide trends and such negative influences as divorce as evidenced by states that spend more for public welfare and have lower suicide rates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

TL;DR: Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that consequences of perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles are more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economics and Identity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider how identity, a person's sense of self, affects economic outcomes and incorporate the psychology and sociology of identity into an economic model of behavior, and construct a simple game-theoretic model showing how identity can affect individual interactions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure

TL;DR: In this article, an emotion-management perspective is proposed as a lens through which to inspect the self, interaction, and structure of emotion, arguing that emotion can be and ofter is subject to acts of management.
Journal ArticleDOI

What is agency

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conceptualize agency as a temporally embedded process of social engagement, informed by the past (in its "iterational" or habitual aspect) but also oriented toward the future (as a projective capacity to imagine alternative possibilities) and toward the present, as a practical-evaluative capacity to contextualize past habits and future projects within the contingencies of the moment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.

TL;DR: In this article, it is proposed that members of stigmatized groups may attribute negative feedback to prejudice against their group, compare their outcomes with those of the ingroup, rather than with the relatively advantaged outgroup, and selectively devalue those dimensions on which their group fares poorly and value those dimensions that their group excels.