scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Forest Research Institute

FacilityDehra Dūn, India
About: Forest Research Institute is a facility organization based out in Dehra Dūn, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Forest management. The organization has 5320 authors who have published 7625 publications receiving 185876 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that the silvicultural operations that have the largest influence on both biotic and abiotic risks to European forest stands are closely related to species composition and the structure of the overstorey.
Abstract: • This article synthesizes and reviews the available information on the effects of forestry practices on the occurrence of biotic and abiotic hazards, as well as on stand susceptibility to these damaging agents, concentrating on mammal herbivores, pest insects, pathogenic fungi, wind and fire. • The management operations examined are site selection, site preparation, stand composition, regeneration method, cleaning and weed control, thinning and pruning, and harvesting. For each of these operations we have examined how they influence the occurrence of biotic and abiotic damaging agents, the susceptibility of European forests, and describe the ecological processes that may explain these influences. • Overall, we find that the silvicultural operations that have the largest influence on both biotic and abiotic risks to European forest stands are closely related to species composition and the structure of the overstorey. Four main processes that drive the causal relationships between stand management and susceptibility have been identified: effect on local microclimate, provision of fuel and resources to biotic and abiotic hazards, enhancement of biological control by natural enemies and changes in individual tree physiology and development. • The review demonstrates an opportunity to develop silvicultural methods that achieve forest management objectives at the same time as minimising biotic and abiotic risks. Mots-cles : sylviculture / peuplement / occurrence / sensibilite /

246 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
11 Dec 2020-Science
TL;DR: Global CFE has declined across most terrestrial regions of the globe from 1982 to 2015, correlating well with changing nutrient concentrations and availability of soil water, and implies a weakening negative feedback on the climatic system and increased societal dependence on future strategies to mitigate climate warming.
Abstract: The enhanced vegetation productivity driven by increased concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) [i.e., the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE)] sustains an important negative feedback on climate warming, but the temporal dynamics of CFE remain unclear. Using multiple long-term satellite- and ground-based datasets, we showed that global CFE has declined across most terrestrial regions of the globe from 1982 to 2015, correlating well with changing nutrient concentrations and availability of soil water. Current carbon cycle models also demonstrate a declining CFE trend, albeit one substantially weaker than that from the global observations. This declining trend in the forcing of terrestrial carbon sinks by increasing amounts of atmospheric CO2 implies a weakening negative feedback on the climatic system and increased societal dependence on future strategies to mitigate climate warming.

246 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sergei Põlme1, Sergei Põlme2, Kessy Abarenkov2, R. Henrik Nilsson3, Björn D. Lindahl4, Karina E. Clemmensen4, Håvard Kauserud5, Nhu H. Nguyen6, Rasmus Kjøller7, Scott T. Bates8, Petr Baldrian9, Tobias Guldberg Frøslev7, Kristjan Adojaan1, Alfredo Vizzini10, Ave Suija1, Donald H. Pfister11, Hans Otto Baral, Helle Järv12, Hugo Madrid13, Hugo Madrid14, Jenni Nordén, Jian-Kui Liu15, Julia Pawłowska16, Kadri Põldmaa1, Kadri Pärtel1, Kadri Runnel1, Karen Hansen17, Karl-Henrik Larsson, Kevin D. Hyde18, Marcelo Sandoval-Denis, Matthew E. Smith19, Merje Toome-Heller20, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Nelson Menolli21, Nicole K. Reynolds19, Rein Drenkhan22, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura15, Tatiana Baptista Gibertoni23, Thomas Læssøe7, William J. Davis24, Yuri Tokarev, Adriana Corrales25, Adriene Mayra Soares, Ahto Agan1, A. R. Machado23, Andrés Argüelles-Moyao26, Andrew P. Detheridge, Angelina de Meiras-Ottoni23, Annemieke Verbeken27, Arun Kumar Dutta28, Bao-Kai Cui29, C. K. Pradeep, César Marín30, Daniel E. Stanton, Daniyal Gohar1, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe31, Eveli Otsing1, Farzad Aslani1, Gareth W. Griffith, Thorsten Lumbsch32, Hans-Peter Grossart33, Hans-Peter Grossart34, Hossein Masigol35, Ina Timling36, Inga Hiiesalu1, Jane Oja1, John Y. Kupagme1, József Geml, Julieta Alvarez-Manjarrez26, Kai Ilves1, Kaire Loit22, Kalev Adamson22, Kazuhide Nara37, Kati Küngas1, Keilor Rojas-Jimenez38, Krišs Bitenieks39, Laszlo Irinyi40, Laszlo Irinyi41, Laszlo Nagy, Liina Soonvald22, Li-Wei Zhou31, Lysett Wagner33, M. Catherine Aime8, Maarja Öpik1, María Isabel Mujica30, Martin Metsoja1, Martin Ryberg42, Martti Vasar1, Masao Murata37, Matthew P. Nelsen32, Michelle Cleary4, Milan C. Samarakoon18, Mingkwan Doilom31, Mohammad Bahram1, Mohammad Bahram4, Niloufar Hagh-Doust1, Olesya Dulya1, Peter R. Johnston43, Petr Kohout9, Qian Chen31, Qing Tian18, Rajasree Nandi44, Rasekh Amiri1, Rekhani H. Perera18, Renata dos Santos Chikowski23, Renato Lucio Mendes-Alvarenga23, Roberto Garibay-Orijel26, Robin Gielen1, Rungtiwa Phookamsak31, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena18, Saleh Rahimlou1, Samantha C. Karunarathna31, Saowaluck Tibpromma31, Shawn P. Brown45, Siim-Kaarel Sepp1, Sunil Mundra46, Sunil Mundra5, Zhu Hua Luo47, Tanay Bose48, Tanel Vahter1, Tarquin Netherway4, Teng Yang31, Tom W. May49, Torda Varga, Wei Li50, Victor R. M. Coimbra23, Virton Rodrigo Targino de Oliveira23, Vitor Xavier de Lima23, Vladimir S. Mikryukov1, Yong-Zhong Lu51, Yosuke Matsuda52, Yumiko Miyamoto53, Urmas Kõljalg2, Urmas Kõljalg1, Leho Tedersoo1, Leho Tedersoo2 
University of Tartu1, American Museum of Natural History2, University of Gothenburg3, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences4, University of Oslo5, University of Hawaii at Manoa6, University of Copenhagen7, Purdue University8, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic9, University of Turin10, Harvard University11, Synlab Group12, Universidad Mayor13, Universidad Santo Tomás14, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China15, University of Warsaw16, Swedish Museum of Natural History17, Mae Fah Luang University18, University of Florida19, Laos Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry20, São Paulo Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology21, Estonian University of Life Sciences22, Federal University of Pernambuco23, United States Department of Energy24, Del Rosario University25, National Autonomous University of Mexico26, Ghent University27, West Bengal State University28, Beijing Forestry University29, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile30, Chinese Academy of Sciences31, Field Museum of Natural History32, Leibniz Association33, University of Potsdam34, University of Gilan35, University of Alaska Fairbanks36, University of Tokyo37, University of Costa Rica38, Forest Research Institute39, Westmead Hospital40, University of Sydney41, Uppsala University42, Landcare Research43, University of Chittagong44, University of Memphis45, United Arab Emirates University46, Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China47, University of Pretoria48, Royal Botanic Gardens49, Ocean University of China50, Guizhou University51, Mie University52, Hokkaido University53
TL;DR: Fungal traits and character database FungalTraits operating at genus and species hypothesis levels is presented in this article, which includes 17 lifestyle related traits of fungal and Stramenopila genera.
Abstract: The cryptic lifestyle of most fungi necessitates molecular identification of the guild in environmental studies. Over the past decades, rapid development and affordability of molecular tools have tremendously improved insights of the fungal diversity in all ecosystems and habitats. Yet, in spite of the progress of molecular methods, knowledge about functional properties of the fungal taxa is vague and interpretation of environmental studies in an ecologically meaningful manner remains challenging. In order to facilitate functional assignments and ecological interpretation of environmental studies we introduce a user friendly traits and character database FungalTraits operating at genus and species hypothesis levels. Combining the information from previous efforts such as FUNGuild and Fun(Fun) together with involvement of expert knowledge, we reannotated 10,210 and 151 fungal and Stramenopila genera, respectively. This resulted in a stand-alone spreadsheet dataset covering 17 lifestyle related traits of fungal and Stramenopila genera, designed for rapid functional assignments of environmental studies. In order to assign the trait states to fungal species hypotheses, the scientific community of experts manually categorised and assigned available trait information to 697,413 fungal ITS sequences. On the basis of those sequences we were able to summarise trait and host information into 92,623 fungal species hypotheses at 1% dissimilarity threshold.

245 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 2018-Nature
TL;DR: It is concluded that environmental and host factors explain most of the variation in ectomycorrhizal diversity, that the environmental thresholds used as major ecosystem assessment tools need adjustment and that the importance of belowground specificity and plasticity has previously been underappreciated.
Abstract: Explaining the large-scale diversity of soil organisms that drive biogeochemical processes—and their responses to environmental change—is critical. However, identifying consistent drivers of belowground diversity and abundance for some soil organisms at large spatial scales remains problematic. Here we investigate a major guild, the ectomycorrhizal fungi, across European forests at a spatial scale and resolution that is—to our knowledge—unprecedented, to explore key biotic and abiotic predictors of ectomycorrhizal diversity and to identify dominant responses and thresholds for change across complex environmental gradients. We show the effect of 38 host, environment, climate and geographical variables on ectomycorrhizal diversity, and define thresholds of community change for key variables. We quantify host specificity and reveal plasticity in functional traits involved in soil foraging across gradients. We conclude that environmental and host factors explain most of the variation in ectomycorrhizal diversity, that the environmental thresholds used as major ecosystem assessment tools need adjustment and that the importance of belowground specificity and plasticity has previously been underappreciated.

245 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the contents of recommendations, guidelines, and other synthesis publications on sustainable use of forest biomass for energy and identified the extent to which wood for energy is included in forest legislation and forest certification standards under the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) and the FSC schemes.
Abstract: The substitution of biomass for fossil fuels in energy consumption is a measure to mitigate global warming, as well as having other advantages. Political action plans for increased use exist at both European and national levels. This paper briefly reviews the contents of recommendations, guidelines, and other synthesis publications on sustainable use of forest biomass for energy. Topics are listed and an overview of advantages, disadvantages, and trade-offs between them is given, from the viewpoint of society in general and the forestry and energy sectors in particular. For the Nordic and Baltic countries, the paper also identifies the extent to which wood for energy is included in forest legislation and forest certification standards under the “Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification” (PEFC) and the “Forest Stewardship Council” (FSC) schemes. Energy and forest policies at EU and national levels, and European PEFC forest standards are analysed. With respect to energy policies, the utilisation of wood for energy is generally supported in forest policies, but forest legislation is seldom used as a direct tool to encourage the utilisation of wood for energy. Regulations sometimes restrict use for environmental reasons. Forest certification standards include indicators directly related to the utilisation of wood for energy under several criteria, with most occurrences found under environmental criteria. Roles and problems in relation to policy, legislation, certification standards, recommendations and guidelines, and science are discussed.

242 citations


Authors

Showing all 5332 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Kari Alitalo174817114231
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Glenn D. Prestwich8869042758
John K. Volkman7821221931
Petri T. Kovanen7743227171
Hailong Wang6964719652
Mika Ala-Korpela6531918048
Heikki Henttonen6427114536
Zhihong Xu5743811832
Kari Pulkki5421511166
Louis A. Schipper531929224
Sang Young Lee532719917
Young-Joon Ahn522889121
Venkatesh Narayanamurti492589399
Francis M. Kelliher491248599
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
35.2K papers, 1.4M citations

87% related

United States Forest Service
21.8K papers, 959.1K citations

86% related

Institut national de la recherche agronomique
68.3K papers, 3.2M citations

83% related

Wageningen University and Research Centre
54.8K papers, 2.6M citations

82% related

Norwegian University of Life Sciences
13.5K papers, 442.2K citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20236
202226
2021504
2020503
2019440
2018381