Institution
University of Bordeaux
Education•Bordeaux, France•
About: University of Bordeaux is a education organization based out in Bordeaux, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Laser. The organization has 28811 authors who have published 55536 publications receiving 1619635 citations. The organization is also known as: UB.
Topics: Population, Laser, Context (language use), Raman spectroscopy, Medicine
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Babraham Institute1, Lund University2, Los Alamos National Laboratory3, University College Dublin4, University of Provence5, University of Bordeaux6, Braunschweig University of Technology7, European Bioinformatics Institute8, University of Kassel9, German Cancer Research Center10, University of Tübingen11, Max Planck Society12, Uppsala University13, Leiden University Medical Center14, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute15, VU University Amsterdam16, Royal Institute of Technology17, University of Zurich18, University of Rijeka19, University of Konstanz20, Technische Universität München21
TL;DR: ProteomeBinders is a new European consortium aiming to establish a comprehensive resource of well-characterized affinity reagents, including but not limited to antibodies, for analysis of the human proteome.
Abstract: ProteomeBinders is a new European consortium aiming to establish a comprehensive resource of well-characterized affinity reagents, including but not limited to antibodies, for analysis of the human proteome. Given the huge diversity of the proteome, the scale of the project is potentially immense but nevertheless feasible in the context of a pan-European or even worldwide coordination.
238 citations
••
TL;DR: It is suggested that craving is a stronger predictor of relapse episodes when assessed in close temporal proximity to substance use, and underscores the importance of the timing of assessments.
238 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the flux of CO 2 across the air-water interface using the floating chamber method in three European estuaries with contrasting physical characteristics (Randers Fjord, Scheldt, and Thames).
Abstract: We measured the flux of CO 2 across the air‐water interface using the floating chamber method in three European estuaries with contrasting physical characteristics (Randers Fjord, Scheldt, and Thames). We computed the gas transfer velocity of CO2 (k) from the CO2 flux and concomitant measurements of the air‐water gradient of the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2). There was a significant linear relationship between k and wind speed for each of the three estuaries. The differences of the y-intercept and the slope between the three sites are related to differences in the contribution of tidal currents to water turbulence at the interface and fetch limitation. The contribution to k from turbulence generated by tidal currents is negligible in microtidal estuaries such as Randers Fjord but is substantial, at low to moderate wind speeds, in macrotidal estuaries such as the Scheldt and the Thames. Our results clearly show that in estuaries a simple parameterization of k as a function of wind speed is site specific and strongly suggest that the y-intercept of the linear relationship is mostly influenced by the contribution of tidal currents, whereas the slope is influenced by fetch limitation. This implies that substantial errors in flux computations are incurred if generic relationships of the gas transfer velocity as a function of wind speed are employed in estuarine environments for the purpose of biogas air‐water flux budgets and ecosystem metabolic studies. Based on organic carbon flux budgets, the overall picture of the net ecosystem metabolism in the coastal ocean is that temperate open continental shelves (bordered by a continental margin) are net autotrophic (net exporters of carbon and thus potential sinks for atmospheric CO2) while near-shore
238 citations
••
University of Würzburg1, National University of Comahue2, Spanish National Research Council3, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences4, Universidade Federal de Goiás5, University of Lisbon6, Stanford University7, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation8, National University of Río Negro9, ETH Zurich10, Cornell University11, University of California, Davis12, The Nature Conservancy13, Wageningen University and Research Centre14, University of British Columbia15, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center16, University of California, Berkeley17, University of Padua18, University of New England (United States)19, Lund University20, University of Göttingen21, University of La Rochelle22, Institut national de la recherche agronomique23, Federal University of Ceará24, Concordia University Wisconsin25, University of Belgrade26, National University of Tucumán27, Michigan State University28, University of Brasília29, University of Greenwich30, University of Reading31, University of Wisconsin-Madison32, Boise State University33, University of Texas at Austin34, University of Haifa35, Kansas State University36, University of Freiburg37, University of Hamburg38, University of California, Santa Barbara39, Seattle University40, University of Vienna41, University of Florida42, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza43, National Audubon Society44, University of Buenos Aires45, Virginia Tech46, University of Bordeaux47, University of Auckland48, University College Dublin49, Trinity College, Dublin50, University of Tokyo51, Federal University of Bahia52, Lincoln University (Pennsylvania)53, National Institute for Environmental Studies54, International Food Policy Research Institute55, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University56
TL;DR: Using a global database from 89 crop systems, the relative importance of abundance and species richness for pollination, biological pest control and final yields in the context of on-going land-use change is partitioned.
Abstract: Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by few abundant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 crop systems, we partition the relative importance of abundance and species richness for pollination, biological pest control and final yields in the context of on-going land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services independent of abundance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
237 citations
••
TL;DR: Growth and metabolism of juvenile European sea bass of a Western Mediterranean population were assessed at six constant temperatures (13, 16, 19, 22, 25 or 29 degreesC) in an 84-day trial as discussed by the authors.
237 citations
Authors
Showing all 28995 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Nicholas G. Martin | 192 | 1770 | 161952 |
George F. Koob | 171 | 935 | 112521 |
Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |
Arthur W. Toga | 159 | 1184 | 109343 |
James M. Tour | 143 | 859 | 91364 |
Floyd E. Bloom | 139 | 616 | 72641 |
Herbert Y. Meltzer | 137 | 1148 | 81371 |
Jean-Marie Tarascon | 136 | 853 | 137673 |
Stanley Nattel | 132 | 778 | 65700 |
Michel Haïssaguerre | 117 | 757 | 62284 |
Liquan Chen | 111 | 689 | 44229 |
Marion Leboyer | 110 | 773 | 50767 |
Jean-François Dartigues | 106 | 631 | 46682 |
Alexa S. Beiser | 106 | 366 | 47457 |
Robert Dantzer | 105 | 497 | 46554 |