scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Moscow State University

EducationMoscow, Russia
About: Moscow State University is a education organization based out in Moscow, Russia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Catalysis & Laser. The organization has 66747 authors who have published 123358 publications receiving 1753995 citations. The organization is also known as: MSU & Lomonosov Moscow State University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the changes to virus taxonomy approved and ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) in March 2017 are presented, and the changes are described in detail.
Abstract: This article lists the changes to virus taxonomy approved and ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) in March 2017.

814 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2  +611 moreInstitutions (63)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3-4 years.
Abstract: Around the globe several observatories are seeking the first direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs). These waves are predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity1 and are generated, for example, by black-hole binary systems2. Present GW detectors are Michelson-type kilometre-scale laser interferometers measuring the distance changes between mirrors suspended in vacuum. The sensitivity of these detectors at frequencies above several hundred hertz is limited by the vacuum (zero-point) fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. A quantum technology—the injection of squeezed light3—offers a solution to this problem. Here we demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO 600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3–4 years. GEO 600 now operates with its best ever sensitivity, which proves the usefulness of quantum entanglement and the qualification of squeezed light as a key technology for future GW astronomy4.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, J M Bravo-San Pedro2, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson3, John M. Abrams4, Dieter Adam5, Emad S. Alnemri6, Lucia Altucci7, David W. Andrews8, Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, Eric H. Baehrecke9, Nicolas G. Bazan10, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand11, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand12, Katiuscia Bianchi13, Katiuscia Bianchi14, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny15, Klas Blomgren16, Christoph Borner17, Dale E. Bredesen18, Dale E. Bredesen19, Catherine Brenner20, Catherine Brenner21, Michelangelo Campanella22, Eleonora Candi23, Francesco Cecconi23, Francis Ka-Ming Chan9, Navdeep S. Chandel24, Emily H. Cheng25, Jerry E. Chipuk3, John A. Cidlowski26, Aaron Ciechanover27, Ted M. Dawson28, Valina L. Dawson28, V De Laurenzi29, R De Maria, Klaus-Michael Debatin30, N. Di Daniele23, Vishva M. Dixit31, Brian David Dynlacht32, Wafik S. El-Deiry33, Gian Maria Fimia34, Richard A. Flavell35, Simone Fulda36, Carmen Garrido37, Marie-Lise Gougeon38, Douglas R. Green, Hinrich Gronemeyer39, György Hajnóczky6, J M Hardwick28, Michael O. Hengartner40, Hidenori Ichijo41, Bertrand Joseph16, Philipp J. Jost42, Thomas Kaufmann43, Oliver Kepp2, Daniel J. Klionsky44, Richard A. Knight22, Richard A. Knight45, Sharad Kumar46, Sharad Kumar47, John J. Lemasters48, Beth Levine49, Beth Levine50, Andreas Linkermann5, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin51, Carlos López-Otín52, Enrico Lugli, Frank Madeo53, Walter Malorni54, Jean-Christophe Marine55, Seamus J. Martin56, J-C Martinou57, Jan Paul Medema58, Pascal Meier, Sonia Melino23, Noboru Mizushima41, Ute M. Moll59, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Gabriel Núñez44, Andrew Oberst60, Theocharis Panaretakis16, Josef M. Penninger, Marcus E. Peter24, Mauro Piacentini23, Paolo Pinton61, Jochen H. M. Prehn62, Hamsa Puthalakath63, Gabriel A. Rabinovich64, Kodi S. Ravichandran65, Rosario Rizzuto66, Cecília M. P. Rodrigues67, David C. Rubinsztein68, Thomas Rudel69, Yufang Shi70, Hans-Uwe Simon43, Brent R. Stockwell71, Brent R. Stockwell50, Gyorgy Szabadkai66, Gyorgy Szabadkai22, Stephen W.G. Tait72, H. L. Tang28, Nektarios Tavernarakis73, Nektarios Tavernarakis74, Yoshihide Tsujimoto, T Vanden Berghe11, T Vanden Berghe12, Peter Vandenabeele11, Peter Vandenabeele12, Andreas Villunger75, Erwin F. Wagner76, Henning Walczak22, Eileen White77, W. G. Wood78, Junying Yuan79, Zahra Zakeri80, Boris Zhivotovsky16, Boris Zhivotovsky81, Gerry Melino45, Gerry Melino23, Guido Kroemer1 
Paris Descartes University1, Institut Gustave Roussy2, Mount Sinai Hospital3, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center4, University of Kiel5, Thomas Jefferson University6, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli7, University of Toronto8, University of Massachusetts Medical School9, Louisiana State University10, Ghent University11, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology12, Cancer Research UK13, Queen Mary University of London14, Roswell Park Cancer Institute15, Karolinska Institutet16, University of Freiburg17, University of California, San Francisco18, Buck Institute for Research on Aging19, French Institute of Health and Medical Research20, Université Paris-Saclay21, University College London22, University of Rome Tor Vergata23, Northwestern University24, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center25, National Institutes of Health26, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology27, Johns Hopkins University28, University of Chieti-Pescara29, University of Ulm30, Genentech31, New York University32, Pennsylvania State University33, University of Salento34, Yale University35, Goethe University Frankfurt36, University of Burgundy37, Pasteur Institute38, University of Strasbourg39, University of Zurich40, University of Tokyo41, Technische Universität München42, University of Bern43, University of Michigan44, Medical Research Council45, University of South Australia46, University of Adelaide47, Medical University of South Carolina48, University of Texas at Dallas49, Howard Hughes Medical Institute50, St. John's University51, University of Oviedo52, University of Graz53, Istituto Superiore di Sanità54, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven55, Trinity College, Dublin56, University of Geneva57, University of Amsterdam58, Stony Brook University59, University of Washington60, University of Ferrara61, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland62, La Trobe University63, University of Buenos Aires64, University of Virginia65, University of Padua66, University of Lisbon67, University of Cambridge68, University of Würzburg69, Soochow University (Suzhou)70, Columbia University71, University of Glasgow72, University of Crete73, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas74, Innsbruck Medical University75, Carlos III Health Institute76, Rutgers University77, University of Minnesota78, Harvard University79, City University of New York80, Moscow State University81
TL;DR: The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.
Abstract: Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death’ (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death’ (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.

809 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) software instrument as discussed by the authors has been updated with the capability to handle floating point exceptions and stellar model optimization, as well as four new software tools.
Abstract: We update the capabilities of the software instrument Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) and enhance its ease of use and availability. Our new approach to locating convective boundaries is consistent with the physics of convection, and yields reliable values of the convective-core mass during both hydrogen- and helium-burning phases. Stars with become white dwarfs and cool to the point where the electrons are degenerate and the ions are strongly coupled, a realm now available to study with MESA due to improved treatments of element diffusion, latent heat release, and blending of equations of state. Studies of the final fates of massive stars are extended in MESA by our addition of an approximate Riemann solver that captures shocks and conserves energy to high accuracy during dynamic epochs. We also introduce a 1D capability for modeling the effects of Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities that, in combination with the coupling to a public version of the radiation transfer instrument, creates new avenues for exploring Type II supernova properties. These capabilities are exhibited with exploratory models of pair-instability supernovae, pulsational pair-instability supernovae, and the formation of stellar-mass black holes. The applicability of MESA is now widened by the capability to import multidimensional hydrodynamic models into MESA. We close by introducing software modules for handling floating point exceptions and stellar model optimization, as well as four new software tools— , -Docker, , and mesastar.org—to enhance MESA's education and research impact.

808 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Aasi1, J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1  +745 moreInstitutions (73)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors inject squeezed states to improve the performance of one of the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) beyond the quantum noise limit, most notably in the frequency region down to 150 Hz.
Abstract: Nearly a century after Einstein first predicted the existence of gravitational waves, a global network of Earth-based gravitational wave observatories1, 2, 3, 4 is seeking to directly detect this faint radiation using precision laser interferometry. Photon shot noise, due to the quantum nature of light, imposes a fundamental limit on the attometre-level sensitivity of the kilometre-scale Michelson interferometers deployed for this task. Here, we inject squeezed states to improve the performance of one of the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) beyond the quantum noise limit, most notably in the frequency region down to 150 Hz, critically important for several astrophysical sources, with no deterioration of performance observed at any frequency. With the injection of squeezed states, this LIGO detector demonstrated the best broadband sensitivity to gravitational waves ever achieved, with important implications for observing the gravitational-wave Universe with unprecedented sensitivity.

805 citations


Authors

Showing all 68238 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1691431128585
A. Gomes1501862113951
Robert J. Sternberg149106689193
James M. Tour14385991364
Alexander Belyaev1421895100796
Rainer Wallny1411661105387
I. V. Gorelov1391916103133
António Amorim136147796519
Halina Abramowicz134119289294
Grigory Safronov133135894610
Elizaveta Shabalina133142192273
Alexander Zhokin132132386842
Eric Conte132120684593
Igor V. Moskalenko13254258182
M. Davier1321449107642
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Russian Academy of Sciences
417.5K papers, 4.5M citations

96% related

Saint Petersburg State University
53.4K papers, 1.1M citations

93% related

Russian Academy
17.7K papers, 340.7K citations

88% related

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
59.4K papers, 573.4K citations

87% related

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023541
20221,582
20217,040
20208,674
20198,296
20187,187