Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture
read more
Citations
LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies :
Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height
WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments
New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution
Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits
References
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.
Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm.
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data
Merlin--rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees.
Related Papers (5)
Twenty bone mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
Multiple Genetic Loci for Bone Mineral Density and Fractures
Whole-genome sequencing identifies EN1 as a determinant of bone density and fracture.
Bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fractures : a genome-wide association study
PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture" ?
Further exploration of these loci with more detailed sequencing, gene expression, and translational studies will be required. In conclusion, these findings highlight the highly polygenic and complex nature underlying BMD variation, shedding light on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying fracture susceptibility and harbouring potential for the future identification of drug targets for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Q3. How many SNPs were removed from the meta-analysis?
45,46 SNPs present in less than three studies were removed from the meta-analysis yielding ~ 2.2 million SNPs in the final results.
Q4. How many loci were found to be associated with a fracture?
In this fracture meta-analysis fourteen loci were significantly associated with any type of fracture at a Bonferroni level (P=5×10−4), of which five included novel BMD loci.
Q5. What were the strongest cis-variants in the BMD loci?
Fourteen of the BMD-associated SNPs correlated with the expression of one or more of the nearby genes with P < 5×10−5 and were either the strongest cis-variants, or good surrogates thereof, for those genes (Supplementary Tables 14 and 15).
Q6. How many SNPs were found in the discovery and replication studies?
The meta-analysis of the 96 SNPs in the discovery and replication studies (n=83,894) yielded 64 replicating SNPs from 56 associated loci.
Q7. What were the significant SNPs of the X-chromosome?
The 96 variants included the 82 index SNPs representing each of the 82 loci reaching P<5×10−6 in Stage 1, 9 SNPs that lie within the same 2Mb windows as the 82 but which were independent from the main signal (secondary signals), and the top-five most associated SNPs of the X-chromosome (with P <5×10−5).
Q8. How many additional participants were tested for association with BMD?
The authors de-novo genotyped these 96 SNPs and tested them for association with BMD in up to 50,933 additional participants from 34 studies (see Online Methods).
Q9. How many individuals of European and East Asian ancestry were included in the meta-analysis?
The authors performed the largest meta-analysis to date on lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, including 17 genome-wide association studies and 32,961 individuals of European and East Asian ancestry.
Q10. What was the proportion of the fracture risk explained by FN-BMD?
The proportion of the fracture risk explained by FN-BMD was calculated from the regression coefficients as (βunadjusted - βBMDadjusted)/βunadjusted in a subset of replication samples for which both FNBMD and complete fracture information was available.
Q11. How do the gradients of risk for osteoporosis and fractures compare?
These gradients reach ORs of 1.56 for osteoporosis and 1.60 for fractures when comparing participants with the highest risk scores with those reflecting the mean score.