Overview of the JET results
read more
Citations
Overview of the JET results in support to ITER
Magnetic-confinement fusion
Impact of nitrogen seeding on confinement and power load control of a high-triangularity JET
Plasma wall interaction and its implication in an all tungsten divertor tokamak. Invited Paper
Thermal quench mitigation and current quench control by injection of mixed species shattered pellets in DIII-D
References
A full tungsten divertor for ITER: Physics issues and design status
A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and ITER optimization with the EPED model
Physics basis and design of the ITER plasma-facing components
Assessment of erosion of the ITER divertor targets during type I ELMs
JET ITER-like wall - overview and experimental programme
Related Papers (5)
Dual sightline measurements of MeV range deuterons with neutron and gamma-ray spectroscopy at JET
Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions
First scenario development with the JET new ITER-like wall
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What were the key aspects for achieving good H-mode confinement?
Magnetic geometry, strike point location and divertor pumping were established as key aspects for achieving good H-mode confinement, leading to the re-establishment of long-pulse (∼9 s) highconfinement H-modes at 2.5 MA.
Q3. How much reduction is needed to match the measurements in L-mode?
In order to match the IR measurements, the tungsten evaporation rate inferred from the W The author400.88 nm line and the Planck radiation, the side heat loads must be reduced by a factor 2.5 in these H-mode discharges (a larger reduction factor of about five is needed to match the measurements in L-mode).
Q4. Why is the JET-ILW migration pattern a possibility?
It should be noted that, due to the low deposition rate and the limited operational time on JET, the JET-ILW migration pattern could represent an intermediate state with respect to long-pulse operation.
Q5. What is the minimum ICRF power needed for achieving a successful core impurity?
A minimum ICRF power (4–5 MW) is necessary for achieving sufficiently peaked temperature profiles in typical H-mode plasmas at central densities ne0 = (7 − 9)×1019 m−3 for successful core impurity mitigation to take place.
Q6. What is the reason for the low collisionality in the JET carbon wall?
In particular, a set of discharges with collisionalities low enough to match the upper range of the hybrid regimes in the JET carbon wall (ν∗ ∼ 0.04) for low triangularity plasmas (δ ∼ 0.15) were achieved.
Q7. What is the importance of central electron heating in high performance JET discharges?
Demonstrating the combination of high radiation using extrinsic impurities with high fusion performance is thus an important part of developing integrated operating scenarios in JET and may be also needed in full performance JET discharges with a long steady-state phase.
Q8. How was the ICRF absorption and core electron heating optimised?
The ICRF absorption and core electron heating were optimised by fine-tuning the resonance position and the minority hydrogen concentration.
Q9. What is the reason for the pedestal pressure increase in high triangularity plasmas?
Nitrogen seeding has also been shown to increase the pedestal pressure by up to 40% in high triangularity and 15% in low triangularity plasmas, restoring the confinement to a similar level to that seen with the carbon wall.
Q10. How many MW of auxiliary power was used in the 1997 JET DT experiment?
This target could be achieved in stationary conditions for about 5 s, rather than transiently as in the 1997 JET DT experiment, corresponding to a total produced fusion energy of 75 MJ, at 3.5 MA/3.45 T with 39 MW of auxiliary power.
Q11. What is the purpose of the horizontal tile of the JET divertor?
The horizontal tile of the JET divertor is made of solid tungsten arranged in four stacks of lamellae in order to minimize the electromagnetic loads during disruptions (figure 2).
Q12. What is the reason for the interaction between the tile and the RE beam?
It is to be noted that, within the uncertainty of the time reference of the IR camera, the interaction between the tile and the RE beam starts before the RE current decay, possibly due to contact with the wall.
Q13. What is the effect of massive argon injection on the disruption mitigation valve?
Although after the installation of the ILW REs [49, 50] are rarely generated during spontaneous disruptions, they can be generated, as in JET-C, using massive argon injection.
Q14. What is the power exponent of the IPB98(y) scaling?
In these conditions the power exponent is found to be in the range −0.2 to −0.4, as shown in figure 9 [57], as compared with −0.69 for the IPB98(y,2) scaling.