Showing papers by "University of Utah published in 2021"
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz2, Sara Abdelfatah3, Mahmoud Abdellatif4 +2980 more•Institutions (777)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
1,129 citations
Northwestern University1, University of California, San Francisco2, University of Michigan3, City of Hope National Medical Center4, Vanderbilt University5, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance6, Fox Chase Cancer Center7, University of Wisconsin-Madison8, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center9, University of Utah10, University of Nebraska Medical Center11, University of Alabama at Birmingham12, University of California, Los Angeles13, University of South Florida14, Mayo Clinic15, Washington University in St. Louis16, Yale Cancer Center17, Stanford University18, Case Western Reserve University19, University of Colorado Boulder20, Brigham and Women's Hospital21, Ohio State University22, Roswell Park Cancer Institute23, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center24, Harvard University25, University of California, San Diego26, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center27, University of Pennsylvania28, University of Tennessee29, Johns Hopkins University30, Duke University31, National Comprehensive Cancer Network32
TL;DR: The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation-positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.
589 citations
TL;DR: The benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials (1,2); however, the benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood Using prospective cohorts of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers* in eight US locations during December 14, 2020-March 13, 2021, CDC routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infections every week regardless of symptom status and at the onset of symptoms consistent with COVID-19-associated illness Among 3,950 participants with no previous laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2,479 (628%) received both recommended mRNA doses and 477 (121%) received only one dose of mRNA vaccine† Among unvaccinated participants, 138 SARS-CoV-2 infections were confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) per 1,000 person-days§ In contrast, among fully immunized (≥14 days after second dose) persons, 004 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported, and among partially immunized (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) persons, 019 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported Estimated mRNA vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infection, adjusted for study site, was 90% for full immunization and 80% for partial immunization These findings indicate that authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptom status, among working-age adults in real-world conditions COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons
576 citations
University of Edinburgh1, Autonomous University of Madrid2, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University3, University of Portsmouth4, University of Cape Town5, University of Wisconsin-Madison6, New Mexico State University7, Moscow State University8, New York University9, University of Utah10, University of Toronto11, Université Paris-Saclay12, University of Waterloo13, Sejong University14, Stanford University15, Max Planck Society16, University College London17, Texas Christian University18, National Autonomous University of Mexico19, University of Barcelona20, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología21, Universidad de Guanajuato22, Liverpool John Moores University23, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory24, Ohio State University25, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne26, University of Wyoming27, Haverford College28, University of Oxford29, University of Pittsburgh30, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics31, California Institute of Technology32, Ohio University33, Swinburne University of Technology34, Fermilab35, University of Washington36, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute37, Brookhaven National Laboratory38, University of St Andrews39, Durham University40
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the cosmological implications from final measurements of clustering using galaxies, quasars, and Lyα forests from the completed SDSS lineage of experiments in large-scale structure.
Abstract: We present the cosmological implications from final measurements of clustering using galaxies, quasars, and Lyα forests from the completed Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) lineage of experiments in large-scale structure. These experiments, composed of data from SDSS, SDSS-II, BOSS, and eBOSS, offer independent measurements of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements of angular-diameter distances and Hubble distances relative to the sound horizon, rd, from eight different samples and six measurements of the growth rate parameter, fσ8, from redshift-space distortions (RSD). This composite sample is the most constraining of its kind and allows us to perform a comprehensive assessment of the cosmological model after two decades of dedicated spectroscopic observation. We show that the BAO data alone are able to rule out dark-energy-free models at more than eight standard deviations in an extension to the flat, ΛCDM model that allows for curvature. When combined with Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurements of temperature and polarization, under the same model, the BAO data provide nearly an order of magnitude improvement on curvature constraints relative to primary CMB constraints alone. Independent of distance measurements, the SDSS RSD data complement weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) in demonstrating a preference for a flat ΛCDM cosmological model when combined with Planck measurements. The combined BAO and RSD measurements indicate σ8=0.85±0.03, implying a growth rate that is consistent with predictions from Planck temperature and polarization data and with General Relativity. When combining the results of SDSS BAO and RSD, Planck, Pantheon Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and DES weak lensing and clustering measurements, all multiple-parameter extensions remain consistent with a ΛCDM model. Regardless of cosmological model, the precision on each of the three parameters, ωΛ, H0, and σ8, remains at roughly 1%, showing changes of less than 0.6% in the central values between models. In a model that allows for free curvature and a time-evolving equation of state for dark energy, the combined samples produce a constraint ωk=-0.0022±0.0022. The dark energy constraints lead to w0=-0.909±0.081 and wa=-0.49-0.30+0.35, corresponding to an equation of state of wp=-1.018±0.032 at a pivot redshift zp=0.29 and a Dark Energy Task Force Figure of Merit of 94. The inverse distance ladder measurement under this model yields H0=68.18±0.79 km s-1 Mpc-1, remaining in tension with several direct determination methods; the BAO data allow Hubble constant estimates that are robust against the assumption of the cosmological model. In addition, the BAO data allow estimates of H0 that are independent of the CMB data, with similar central values and precision under a ΛCDM model. Our most constraining combination of data gives the upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at mν<0.115 eV (95% confidence). Finally, we consider the improvements in cosmology constraints over the last decade by comparing our results to a sample representative of the period 2000-2010. We compute the relative gain across the five dimensions spanned by w, ωk, mν, H0, and σ8 and find that the SDSS BAO and RSD data reduce the total posterior volume by a factor of 40 relative to the previous generation. Adding again the Planck, DES, and Pantheon SN Ia samples leads to an overall contraction in the five-dimensional posterior volume of 3 orders of magnitude.
575 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, Mayo Clinic2, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance3, University of Colorado Boulder4, University of Utah5, Fox Chase Cancer Center6, Northwestern University7, Case Western Reserve University8, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center9, Brigham and Women's Hospital10, Duke University11, University of South Florida12, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center13, Yale Cancer Center14, University of California, San Francisco15, Roswell Park Cancer Institute16, Harvard University17, University of Wisconsin-Madison18, University of Michigan19, Stanford University20, Vanderbilt University21, City of Hope National Medical Center22, Washington University in St. Louis23, University of Tennessee Health Science Center24, Ohio State University25, University of California, San Diego26, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center27, University of Pennsylvania28, University of California, Los Angeles29, National Comprehensive Cancer Network30
TL;DR: The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) address all aspects of management for NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines regarding targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and their respective biomarkers.
495 citations
Fox Chase Cancer Center1, Vanderbilt University2, University of Tennessee Health Science Center3, University of Utah4, Washington University in St. Louis5, University of Pennsylvania6, University of Alabama at Birmingham7, Johns Hopkins University8, Roswell Park Cancer Institute9, University of California, Los Angeles10, Northwestern University11, University of Colorado Boulder12, Stanford University13, University of South Florida14, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center15, University of California, San Francisco16, Duke University17, University of Michigan18, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance19, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center20, Case Western Reserve University21, University of Nebraska Medical Center22, Ohio State University23, Harvard University24, University of California, San Diego25, City of Hope National Medical Center26, Mayo Clinic27, University of Wisconsin-Madison28, Brigham and Women's Hospital29, National Comprehensive Cancer Network30
TL;DR: The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.
455 citations
TL;DR: It was showed that being a woman, having fair/poor general health status, being 18 to 24 years old, spending 8 or more hours on screens daily, and knowing someone infected predicted higher levels of psychological impact when risk factors were considered simultaneously.
Abstract: Background University students are increasingly recognized as a vulnerable population, suffering from higher levels of anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and disordered eating compared to the general population. Therefore, when the nature of their educational experience radically changes—such as sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic—the burden on the mental health of this vulnerable population is amplified. The objectives of this study are to 1) identify the array of psychological impacts COVID-19 has on students, 2) develop profiles to characterize students' anticipated levels of psychological impact during the pandemic, and 3) evaluate potential sociodemographic, lifestyle-related, and awareness of people infected with COVID-19 risk factors that could make students more likely to experience these impacts. Methods Cross-sectional data were collected through web-based questionnaires from seven U.S. universities. Representative and convenience sampling was used to invite students to complete the questionnaires in mid-March to early-May 2020, when most coronavirus-related sheltering in place orders were in effect. We received 2,534 completed responses, of which 61% were from women, 79% from non-Hispanic Whites, and 20% from graduate students. Results Exploratory factor analysis on close-ended responses resulted in two latent constructs, which we used to identify profiles of students with latent profile analysis, including high (45% of sample), moderate (40%), and low (14%) levels of psychological impact. Bivariate associations showed students who were women, were non-Hispanic Asian, in fair/poor health, of below-average relative family income, or who knew someone infected with COVID-19 experienced higher levels of psychological impact. Students who were non-Hispanic White, above-average social class, spent at least two hours outside, or less than eight hours on electronic screens were likely to experience lower levels of psychological impact. Multivariate modeling (mixed-effects logistic regression) showed that being a woman, having fair/poor general health status, being 18 to 24 years old, spending 8 or more hours on screens daily, and knowing someone infected predicted higher levels of psychological impact when risk factors were considered simultaneously. Conclusion Inadequate efforts to recognize and address college students’ mental health challenges, especially during a pandemic, could have long-term consequences on their health and education.
444 citations
University of California, San Francisco1, University of South Florida2, University of Michigan3, University of Tennessee Health Science Center4, Northwestern University5, Vanderbilt University6, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance7, City of Hope National Medical Center8, Duke University9, University of Colorado Boulder10, Ohio State University11, University of California, Los Angeles12, Fox Chase Cancer Center13, Harvard University14, Roswell Park Cancer Institute15, Case Western Reserve University16, Washington University in St. Louis17, University of Nebraska Medical Center18, Yale Cancer Center19, University of Wisconsin-Madison20, University of California, San Diego21, Pancreatic Cancer Action Network22, Johns Hopkins University23, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center24, University of Alabama at Birmingham25, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center26, University of Utah27, Stanford University28, University of Pennsylvania29, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center30, Brigham and Women's Hospital31, National Comprehensive Cancer Network32
Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among men and women in the United States. A major challenge in treatment remains patients' advanced disease at diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma provides recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although survival rates remain relatively unchanged, newer modalities of treatment, including targeted therapies, provide hope for improving patient outcomes. Sections of the manuscript have been updated to be concordant with the most recent update to the guidelines. This manuscript focuses on the available systemic therapy approaches, specifically the treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic disease.
402 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries.
Abstract: We report the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO’s and Virgo’s third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star–black hole (NSBH) binaries. The two events are named GW200105_162426 and GW200115_042309, abbreviated as GW200105 and GW200115; the first was observed by LIGO Livingston and Virgo and the second by all three LIGO–Virgo detectors. The source of GW200105 has component masses 8.9−1.5+1.2 and 1.9−0.2+0.3M⊙ , whereas the source of GW200115 has component masses 5.7−2.1+1.8 and 1.5−0.3+0.7M⊙ (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). The probability that the secondary’s mass is below the maximal mass of a neutron star is 89%–96% and 87%–98%, respectively, for GW200105 and GW200115, with the ranges arising from different astrophysical assumptions. The source luminosity distances are 280−110+110 and 300−100+150Mpc , respectively. The magnitude of the primary spin of GW200105 is less than 0.23 at the 90% credible level, and its orientation is unconstrained. For GW200115, the primary spin has a negative spin projection onto the orbital angular momentum at 88% probability. We are unable to constrain the spin or tidal deformation of the secondary component for either event. We infer an NSBH merger rate density of 45−33+75Gpc−3yr−1 when assuming that GW200105 and GW200115 are representative of the NSBH population or 130−69+112Gpc−3yr−1 under the assumption of a broader distribution of component masses.
374 citations
Evgeny Epifanovsky, Andrew T.B. Gilbert1, Andrew T.B. Gilbert2, Xintian Feng3 +235 more•Institutions (54)
TL;DR: The Q-Chem quantum chemistry program package as discussed by the authors provides a suite of tools for modeling core-level spectroscopy, methods for describing metastable resonances, and methods for computing vibronic spectra, the nuclear-electronic orbital method, and several different energy decomposition analysis techniques.
Abstract: This article summarizes technical advances contained in the fifth major release of the Q-Chem quantum chemistry program package, covering developments since 2015. A comprehensive library of exchange-correlation functionals, along with a suite of correlated many-body methods, continues to be a hallmark of the Q-Chem software. The many-body methods include novel variants of both coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction approaches along with methods based on the algebraic diagrammatic construction and variational reduced density-matrix methods. Methods highlighted in Q-Chem 5 include a suite of tools for modeling core-level spectroscopy, methods for describing metastable resonances, methods for computing vibronic spectra, the nuclear-electronic orbital method, and several different energy decomposition analysis techniques. High-performance capabilities including multithreaded parallelism and support for calculations on graphics processing units are described. Q-Chem boasts a community of well over 100 active academic developers, and the continuing evolution of the software is supported by an "open teamware" model and an increasingly modular design.
360 citations
University of California1, Duke University2, University of Glasgow3, University of Brescia4, Harvard University5, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill6, University of Minnesota7, University of Copenhagen8, Saarland University9, Medical University of Vienna10, Imperial College London11, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile12, Linköping University13, University of Utah14, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens15, Nova Southeastern University16, Comenius University in Bratislava17, Sofia Medical University18, Henry Ford Hospital19, Peking Union Medical College20, Middlemore Hospital21, St. Vincent's Health System22, Moscow State University23, Université de Montréal24, Wrocław Medical University25, University of São Paulo26, Vilnius University27, University of Cape Town28, Masaryk University29, University Hospital of Bern30, St John of God Health Care31, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy32, University of Groningen33, Dokuz Eylül University34, University of Lorraine35, Amgen36
TL;DR: Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, patients who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo.
Abstract: Background The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect ...
Northwestern University1, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, University of South Florida4, Johns Hopkins University5, University of Nebraska Medical Center6, Mayo Clinic7, Vanderbilt University8, University of California, San Diego9, Case Western Reserve University10, Stanford University11, Ohio State University12, University of Tennessee Health Science Center13, Harvard University14, Washington University in St. Louis15, Roswell Park Cancer Institute16, University of Alabama at Birmingham17, University of California, San Francisco18, University of Utah19, University of Pennsylvania20, Duke University21, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance22, University of California, Los Angeles23, Fox Chase Cancer Center24, University of Michigan25, University of Colorado Boulder26, City of Hope National Medical Center27, Yale University28, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center29, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center30, National Comprehensive Cancer Network31
TL;DR: The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.
TL;DR: In this paper, the effectiveness of the two-dose messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) was evaluated.
Abstract: Background Information is limited regarding the effectiveness of the two-dose messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in preventing infection with ...
University of Granada1, ETH Zurich2, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign3, University of Groningen4, University of Utah5, University of Potsdam6, University of Tokyo7, University of Jaén8, University College Cork9, Seoul National University10, University of Glasgow11, University of Denver12, Princeton University13, Spanish National Research Council14, University of Grenoble15, National Museum of Natural History16, University of Bonn17, Panjab University, Chandigarh18, University of Düsseldorf19, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology20, Technical University of Berlin21, John Innes Centre22, Nanjing University23, Massachusetts Institute of Technology24, Leiden University25, Fudan University26, Chinese Academy of Sciences27
TL;DR: The review discusses the new classes of RiPPs that have been discovered, the advances in the understanding of the installation of both primary and secondary post-translational modifications, and the mechanisms by which the enzymes recognize the leader peptides in their substrates.
Vanderbilt University1, Scott & White Hospital2, Texas A&M University3, University of Colorado Denver4, University of Iowa5, Wake Forest University6, Johns Hopkins University7, Hennepin County Medical Center8, Yeshiva University9, University of Washington10, Tufts University11, University of Utah12, University of Michigan13, Oregon Health & Science University14, Emory University15, Cleveland Clinic16, Stanford University17, University of California, Los Angeles18, University of Miami19, Washington University in St. Louis20, Ohio State University21
TL;DR: In this paper, a case-control analysis was conducted among 3,689 adults aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized at 21 U.S. hospitals across 18 states during March 11-August 15, 2021.
Abstract: Three COVID-19 vaccines are authorized or approved for use among adults in the United States (1,2). Two 2-dose mRNA vaccines, mRNA-1273 from Moderna and BNT162b2 from Pfizer-BioNTech, received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020 for persons aged ≥18 years and aged ≥16 years, respectively. A 1-dose viral vector vaccine (Ad26.COV2 from Janssen [Johnson & Johnson]) received EUA in February 2021 for persons aged ≥18 years (3). The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine received FDA approval for persons aged ≥16 years on August 23, 2021 (4). Current guidelines from FDA and CDC recommend vaccination of eligible persons with one of these three products, without preference for any specific vaccine (4,5). To assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) of these three products in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization, CDC and collaborators conducted a case-control analysis among 3,689 adults aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized at 21 U.S. hospitals across 18 states during March 11-August 15, 2021. An additional analysis compared serum antibody levels (anti-spike immunoglobulin G [IgG] and anti-receptor binding domain [RBD] IgG) to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, among 100 healthy volunteers enrolled at three hospitals 2-6 weeks after full vaccination with the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, or Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with immunocompromising conditions were excluded. VE against COVID-19 hospitalizations was higher for the Moderna vaccine (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 91%-95%) than for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (88%; 95% CI = 85%-91%) (p = 0.011); VE for both mRNA vaccines was higher than that for the Janssen vaccine (71%; 95% CI = 56%-81%) (all p<0.001). Protection for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine declined 4 months after vaccination. Postvaccination anti-spike IgG and anti-RBD IgG levels were significantly lower in persons vaccinated with the Janssen vaccine than the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. Although these real-world data suggest some variation in levels of protection by vaccine, all FDA-approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccines provide substantial protection against COVID-19 hospitalization.
TL;DR: COVID and associated educational/governmental mitigation strategies had a modest but persistent impact on mood and wellness behaviors of first-year university students and Colleges should prepare to address the continued mental health impacts of the pandemic.
Abstract: Objective To test the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) pandemic on the emotions, behavior, and wellness behaviors of first-year college students. Method A total of 675 first-year university students completed a full assessment of behavioral and emotional functioning at the beginning of the spring semester 2020. Of these, 576 completed the same assessment at the end of the spring semester, 600 completed at least 1 item from a COVID-related survey after the onset of COVID pandemic, and 485 completed nightly surveys of mood and wellness behaviors on a regular basis before and after the onset of the COVID crisis. Results Externalizing problems (mean = −0.19, 95% CI = −0.06 to 0.33, p = .004) and attention problems (mean = −0.60, 95% CI = −0.40 to 0.80, p Conclusion COVID and associated educational/governmental mitigation strategies had a modest but persistent impact on mood and wellness behaviors of first-year university students. Colleges should prepare to address the continued mental health impacts of the pandemic.
University of Utah1, University of Colorado Denver2, Oregon Health & Science University3, Harvard University4, University of California, San Diego5, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston6, Medical College of Wisconsin7, Medical University of South Carolina8, Northwestern University9, Emory University10, University of Pennsylvania11, University of São Paulo12, Sun Yat-sen University13, Karolinska Institutet14, Ghent University15, University of Chicago16, Rush University Medical Center17, University of Barcelona18, University of California, Los Angeles19, Vanderbilt University20, University of Arizona21, University of Kansas22, Université de Montréal23, University of Auckland24, Rutgers University25, University of Amsterdam26, Columbia University27, Eastern Virginia Medical School28, University of New South Wales29, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven30, Guy's Hospital31, Stanford University32, University of British Columbia33, Mayo Clinic34, Johns Hopkins University35, Korea University36, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences37, Jikei University School of Medicine38, University of Washington39, University of Siena40, University of East Anglia41, University of Adelaide42, Pusan National University43, University of Calgary44, University of Cincinnati45, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill46, Cleveland Clinic47, University of Winnipeg48, Chulalongkorn University49, Cornell University50, National University of Singapore51, University of Alabama at Birmingham52, University of Alberta53, Capital Medical University54
TL;DR: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in the understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease.
Abstract: I. Executive summary BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document. Methods ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.
TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed review of the physical processes during 3D printing and the fundamental science of densification after sintering and post-heat treatment steps are provided to understand the microstructural evolution and properties of binder jetted parts.
Mayo Clinic1, Harvard University2, Roswell Park Cancer Institute3, University of California, Irvine4, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee5, Rutgers University6, City of Hope National Medical Center7, Boston University8, University of Wisconsin-Madison9, American Cancer Society10, University of Southern California11, University of Oxford12, Stanford University13, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center14, University of Washington15, National Institutes of Health16, Vanderbilt University17, Cornell University18, University of Utah19, University of Pennsylvania20
TL;DR: In this paper, population-based estimates of the risk of breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposition genes are critically needed for risk assessment and risk assessment.
Abstract: Background Population-based estimates of the risk of breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposition genes are critically needed for risk assessment and...
Tulane University1, Kurume University2, Manipal University3, Okayama University4, New Generation University College5, Yonsei University6, Gdańsk Medical University7, All India Institute of Medical Sciences8, University of Bari9, University of Kansas10, Stowers Institute for Medical Research11, Complutense University of Madrid12, Ankara University13, Ege University14, University of Utah15, Jagiellonian University Medical College16, St. George's University17, University of Rouen18, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg19, University of La Frontera20, St George's, University of London21, Northern Borders University22
TL;DR: Twenty editors‐in‐chiefs from 17 anatomical journals joined together to put together official recommendations that can be used by authors when acknowledging the donor cadavers used in their studies to standardize the writing approach by which donors are acknowledged in anatomical studies that use human cadaveric tissues.
Abstract: Research within the anatomical sciences often relies on human cadaveric tissues. Without the good will of these donors who allow us to use their bodies to push forward our anatomical knowledge, most human anatomical research would come to a standstill. However, many research papers omit an acknowledgement to the donor cadavers or, as no current standardized versions exist, use language that is extremely varied. To remedy this problem, 20 editors-in-chiefs from 17 anatomical journals joined together to put together official recommendations that can be used by authors when acknowledging the donor cadavers used in their studies. The goal of these recommendations is to standardize the writing approach by which donors are acknowledged in anatomical studies that use human cadaveric tissues. Such sections in anatomical papers will not only rightfully thank those who made the donation but might also encourage, motivate, and inspire future individuals to make such gifts for the betterment of the anatomical sciences and patient care.
University of Sydney1, University of Utah2, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization3, University of Glasgow4, University of California, Berkeley5, University of California, San Diego6, University of California, Davis7, Imperial College London8, Pennsylvania State University9, University of Melbourne10, Wellcome Trust11, University of Otago12, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University13, Texas A&M University14, King's College London15, Medical University of Vienna16, University of Pennsylvania17, University of Arizona18, Scripps Research Institute19, Tulane University20, University of Edinburgh21
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the current scientific evidence that may help clarify the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is presented, with a focus on how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 emerged in the human population.
Johns Hopkins University1, Vanderbilt University2, Mayo Clinic3, University of Wisconsin-Madison4, University of Colorado Boulder5, Duke University6, University of California, San Francisco7, City of Hope National Medical Center8, Harvard University9, University of Texas at Austin10, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center11, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center12, University of South Florida13, Fox Chase Cancer Center14, Stanford University15, University of California, Los Angeles16, Brigham and Women's Hospital17, Case Western Reserve University18, University of Pennsylvania19, Northwestern University20, University of California, San Diego21, University of Michigan22, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center23, Ohio State University24, Yale University25, University of Nebraska Medical Center26, University of Utah27, Roswell Park Cancer Institute28, National Comprehensive Cancer Network29
Northwestern University1, Stanford University2, Johns Hopkins University3, Duke University4, University of Pennsylvania5, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center6, Harvard University7, Mayo Clinic8, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center9, City of Hope National Medical Center10, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center11, Fox Chase Cancer Center12, Washington University in St. Louis13, Roswell Park Cancer Institute14, University of Wisconsin-Madison15, University of California, San Diego16, Case Western Reserve University17, Vanderbilt University18, University of South Florida19, University of California, Los Angeles20, University of Tennessee Health Science Center21, University of California, San Francisco22, Ohio State University23, University of Michigan24, University of Nebraska Medical Center25, University of Utah26, National Comprehensive Cancer Network27
TL;DR: The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, and metastatic disease Recommendations for disease monitoring and treatment of recurrent disease are also included as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, and metastatic disease Recommendations for disease monitoring and treatment of recurrent disease are also included The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel meets annually to reevaluate and update their recommendations based on new clinical data and input from within NCCN Member Institutions and from external entities This article summarizes the panel's discussions for the 2021 update of the guidelines with regard to systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
TL;DR: In this article, a prospective, multi-center, observational study of consecutive hospitalized adults in the NYC metropolitan area with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was conducted to determine the prevalence and associated mortality of well defined neurologic diagnoses among COVID-19 patients.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated mortality of well-defined neurologic diagnoses among COVID-19 patients, we prospectively followed hospitalized SARS-Cov-2 positive patients and recorded new neurologic disorders and hospital outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-center, observational study of consecutive hospitalized adults in the NYC metropolitan area with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevalence of new neurologic disorders (as diagnosed by a neurologist) was recorded and in-hospital mortality and discharge disposition were compared between COVID-19 patients with and without neurologic disorders. RESULTS: Of 4,491 COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the study timeframe, 606 (13.5%) developed a new neurologic disorder in a median of 2 days from COVID-19 symptom onset. The most common diagnoses were: toxic/metabolic encephalopathy (6.8%), seizure (1.6%), stroke (1.9%), and hypoxic/ischemic injury (1.4%). No patient had meningitis/encephalitis, or myelopathy/myelitis referable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and 18/18 CSF specimens were RT-PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2. Patients with neurologic disorders were more often older, male, white, hypertensive, diabetic, intubated, and had higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (all P<0.05). After adjusting for age, sex, SOFA-scores, intubation, past history, medical complications, medications and comfort-care-status, COVID-19 patients with neurologic disorders had increased risk of in-hospital mortality (Hazard Ratio[HR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.17-1.62, P<0.001) and decreased likelihood of discharge home (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.85, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic disorders were detected in 13.5% of COVID-19 patients and were associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality and decreased likelihood of discharge home. Many observed neurologic disorders may be sequelae of severe systemic illness.
TL;DR: In this article, a nine-week wastewater epidemiology study of ten wastewater facilities, serving 39% of the state of Utah or 1.26 million individuals was conducted in April and May of 2020.
University College London1, The George Institute for Global Health2, AstraZeneca3, University Medical Center Groningen4, Stanford University5, University of Utah6, Southern Medical University7, University of Glasgow8, University of Copenhagen9, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center10, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust11
TL;DR: The relative risk reduction for the primary composite outcome with dapagliflozin was consistent in participants with type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes, with similar consistency seen across the secondary outcomes.
University of Missouri–Kansas City1, Mayo Clinic2, Wake Forest University3, Northwestern University4, Emory University5, Cardiovascular Institute of the South6, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine7, NorthShore University HealthSystem8, University of Utah9, University of Maryland, Baltimore10, Stormont Vail Health11, Allegheny Health Network12, Eastern Virginia Medical School13, Harvard University14, University of Southern California15
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated whether the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin improves the primary endpoint of KCCQ-CS, a measure of heart failure-related health status, at 12 weeks after treatment initiation.
Abstract: Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a high burden of symptoms and functional limitations, and have a poor quality of life. By targeting cardiometabolic abmormalities, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may improve these impairments. In this multicenter, randomized trial of patients with HFpEF (NCT03030235), we evaluated whether the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin improves the primary endpoint of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CS), a measure of heart failure-related health status, at 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), KCCQ Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS), clinically meaningful changes in KCCQ-CS and -OS, and changes in weight, natriuretic peptides, glycated hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure. In total, 324 patients were randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo. Dapagliflozin improved KCCQ-CS (effect size, 5.8 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3–9.2, P = 0.001), meeting the predefined primary endpoint, due to improvements in both KCCQ total symptom score (KCCQ-TS) (5.8 points (95% CI 2.0–9.6, P = 0.003)) and physical limitations scores (5.3 points (95% CI 0.7–10.0, P = 0.026)). Dapagliflozin also improved 6MWT (mean effect size of 20.1 m (95% CI 5.6–34.7, P = 0.007)), KCCQ-OS (4.5 points (95% CI 1.1–7.8, P = 0.009)), proportion of participants with 5-point or greater improvements in KCCQ-OS (odds ratio (OR) = 1.73 (95% CI 1.05–2.85, P = 0.03)) and reduced weight (mean effect size, 0.72 kg (95% CI 0.01–1.42, P = 0.046)). There were no significant differences in other secondary endpoints. Adverse events were similar between dapagliflozin and placebo (44 (27.2%) versus 38 (23.5%) patients, respectively). These results indicate that 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment significantly improved patient-reported symptoms, physical limitations and exercise function and was well tolerated in chronic HFpEF. In a multicenter, randomized trial, the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin improved the health status and exercise function of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a condition for which effective treatments are lacking.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1, Vanderbilt University2, Tufts University3, Harvard University4, University of Colorado Denver5, Hennepin County Medical Center6, University of Utah7, Yeshiva University8, Oregon Health & Science University9, Ohio State University10, Wake Forest University11, Johns Hopkins University12, University of California, Los Angeles13, Stanford University14, Scott & White Hospital15, University of Michigan16, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System17, University of Pittsburgh18
TL;DR: In this paper, the effectiveness of partial or full vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was assessed among adults aged ≥ 65 years.
Abstract: Adults aged ≥65 years are at increased risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19 and were identified as a priority group to receive the first COVID-19 vaccines approved for use under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States (1-3). In an evaluation at 24 hospitals in 14 states,* the effectiveness of partial or full vaccination† with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was assessed among adults aged ≥65 years. Among 417 hospitalized adults aged ≥65 years (including 187 case-patients and 230 controls), the median age was 73 years, 48% were female, 73% were non-Hispanic White, 17% were non-Hispanic Black, 6% were Hispanic, and 4% lived in a long-term care facility. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19-associated hospitalization among adults aged ≥65 years was estimated to be 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 49%-99%) for full vaccination and 64% (95% CI = 28%-82%) for partial vaccination. These findings are consistent with efficacy determined from clinical trials in the subgroup of adults aged ≥65 years (4,5). This multisite U.S. evaluation under real-world conditions suggests that vaccination provided protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization among adults aged ≥65 years. Vaccination is a critical tool for reducing severe COVID-19 in groups at high risk.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) to produce spin-polarized carriers and demonstrated a spin-LED that operates at room temperature without magnetic fields or ferromagnetic contacts.
Abstract: In traditional optoelectronic approaches, control over spin, charge, and light requires the use of both electrical and magnetic fields. In a spin-polarized light-emitting diode (spin-LED), charges are injected, and circularly polarized light is emitted from spin-polarized carrier pairs. Typically, the injection of carriers occurs with the application of an electric field, whereas spin polarization can be achieved using an applied magnetic field or polarized ferromagnetic contacts. We used chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) to produce spin-polarized carriers and demonstrate a spin-LED that operates at room temperature without magnetic fields or ferromagnetic contacts. The CISS layer consists of oriented, self-assembled small chiral molecules within a layered organic-inorganic metal-halide hybrid semiconductor framework. The spin-LED achieves ±2.6% circularly polarized electroluminescence at room temperature.
University of Calgary1, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research2, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences3, ETH Zurich4, University of Washington5, University of Zurich6, University of Potsdam7, United States Geological Survey8, University of Minnesota9, University of Graz10, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna11, University of Toulouse12, University of Utah13, Heidelberg University14, University of Geneva15, University of Leeds16, Simon Fraser University17, Newcastle University18, University of Dayton19, University of Oslo20, Planetary Science Institute21, University of Alberta22, University of Grenoble23, University of Sheffield24, Indian Institute of Technology Indore25, University of Dundee26, UNESCO27, Jawaharlal Nehru University28, Stockholm International Water Institute29, University of British Columbia30, University of Exeter31, Kathmandu32, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology33, University of Kashmir34, University of Delhi35, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development36, Utrecht University37, University of Chile38, Northumbria University39
TL;DR: In this paper, an analysis of satellite imagery, seismic records, numerical model results, and eyewitness videos reveals that ~27x106 m3 of rock and glacier ice collapsed from the steep north face of Ronti Peak.
Abstract: On 7 Feb 2021, a catastrophic mass flow descended the Ronti Gad, Rishiganga, and Dhauliganga valleys in Chamoli, Uttarakhand, India, causing widespread devastation and severely damaging two hydropower projects. Over 200 people were killed or are missing. Our analysis of satellite imagery, seismic records, numerical model results, and eyewitness videos reveals that ~27x106 m3 of rock and glacier ice collapsed from the steep north face of Ronti Peak. The rock and ice avalanche rapidly transformed into an extraordinarily large and mobile debris flow that transported boulders >20 m in diameter, and scoured the valley walls up to 220 m above the valley floor. The intersection of the hazard cascade with downvalley infrastructure resulted in a disaster, which highlights key questions about adequate monitoring and sustainable development in the Himalaya as well as other remote, high-mountain environments.