scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2983 more
- 08 Feb 2021 - 
- Vol. 17, Iss: 1, pp 1-382
TLDR
In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in major human diseases

Daniel J. Klionsky, +71 more
- 01 Oct 2021 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing.

TL;DR: The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases associated with or occurring in the context of ageing, including insulin resistance, T2DM and sarcopenic obesity, was discussed in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI

The SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF3a inhibits fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically screened 28 viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and identified that ORF3a strongly inhibited autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The STING1 network regulates autophagy and cell death.

TL;DR: The latest advances in the understanding of the regulating mechanisms and signaling pathways of STING1 in autophagy and cell death are outlined, which may shed light on new targets for therapeutic interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagosomal Syntaxin17-dependent lysosomal degradation maintains neuronal function in Drosophila

TL;DR: Lysosomal degradation and recycling of sequestered autophagosome content is crucial to maintain proper functioning of the fly nervous system.
Journal ArticleDOI

mTOR-mediated dedifferentiation of the retinal pigment epithelium initiates photoreceptor degeneration in mice

TL;DR: An in vivo response of the mature RPE to diverse stressors that prolongs RPE cell survival at the expense of epithelial attributes and photoreceptor function is revealed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Post-translational modifications of three members of the human MAP1LC3 family and detection of a novel type of modification for MAP1LC3B.

TL;DR: Different regulation of the three human isoforms of MAP1LC3 are revealed and implicate that the three isoforms may have different physiological functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

ATG genes involved in non-selective autophagy are conserved from yeast to man, but the selective Cvt and pexophagy pathways also require organism-specific genes.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that Atg proteins required for non-selective macroautophagy are conserved from yeast to man, stressing the importance of this process in cell survival and viability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pexophagy: the selective autophagy of peroxisomes.

TL;DR: This work has found that upon glucose- or ethanol-induced catabolite inactivation of metabolically superfluous peroxisomes are rapidly and selectively degraded within the vacuole by a process called pexophagy, the selective removal of per oxisomes by autophagy-like processes.
Related Papers (5)

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

Daniel J. Klionsky, +1287 more
- 01 Apr 2012 - 

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2522 more
- 21 Jan 2016 - 
Trending Questions (2)
What does autophagy do Reddit?

Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway.

Is 20 hours enough for autophagy?

Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms.